Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084793C070212
Original file (2003084793C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 5 August 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084793

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful. Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in action during World War II and would like to receive the PH he is entitled to.

4. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

5. The separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 23 April 1941. He continuously served on active duty until being honorably separated on 2 July 1945.

6. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 also shows that he served in the Pacific Theater of Operations (PTO) from 14 May 1942 through 17 June 1944, and that the highest rank he attained was sergeant, which is the grade he held on the date of his separation. This document also shows that he served in military occupational specialty 607 (Mortar NCO), and that he earned the Combat Infantryman Badge. It also confirms that he participated in the New Guinea and Papuan campaigns of World War II, and that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: Distinguished Unit Badge; Good Conduct Medal; American Defense Service Ribbon; Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with
2 bronze service stars; and four overseas bars. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) contains the entry “None.”

7. There is a Military Finding Report from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), dated 4 March 2003, on file. This document contains information from hospital admission cards created by the Office of The Surgeon General (OTSG) for the period 1942-1945. This report indicates that the applicant was treated at a New Guinea military medical facility in 1942, after having received a penetrating shrapnel wound to the thigh. The report specifies that the wound was received in the line of duty and the applicant was categorized as a battle casualty.

8. Also on file is a copy of General Order (GO) Number 1, issued by Headquarters, 126th Infantry, dated 5 February 1945, which confirms that the applicant was awarded the CIB for exemplary conduct in action against the enemy.

9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who, while serving in any capacity with one of the Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed in action. The regulation defines a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained under conditions defined by this regulation. In order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record.

10. Paragraph 3-13 of the awards regulation outlines the criteria for the award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Paragraph 3-13d (2) states, in effect, that the BSM is authorized to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 6 December 1941, were cited in orders or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy between 7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945, inclusive, or whose meritorious achievement was otherwise confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July 1947. This paragraph also stipulates that for this purpose, an award of the CIB is considered as a citation in orders.

11. Paragraph 5-11 (World War II Victory Medal) of the same regulation indicates that the World War II Victory Medal was established by the act of Congress 6 July 1945 and is awarded for service between 7 December 1941 and 31 December 1946.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he earned the PH for wounds he received in the PTO during World War II, and finds that this claim has merit. In addition, the Board concludes that the applicant is also eligible for the BSM and World War II Victory Medal, awards he did not specifically request in his application.

2. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of the medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record. The Board finds that the medical casualty record pertaining to the applicant provided by the OTSG and contained in the NARA report sufficiently satisfies the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH.
3. The awards regulation also specifies that the BSM is authorized for members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 6 December 1941, have been cited in orders or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy during World War II and that for this purpose the CIB is considered as a citation in orders. Given the fact that the applicant was awarded the CIB, the Board finds that it would also be proper to award him the BSM at this time based on this regulatory criteria.

4. The Board further finds that the applicant is entitled to the World War II Victory Medal based on his period of qualifying service during the authorized period. Thus, it also concludes that it would also be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for a wound he received in action in 1942, while serving as a sergeant in the Pacific Theater of Operations during World War II; by awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement based on his exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy during World War II; by awarding him the World War II Victory Medal for his service during the authorized period; and by providing him a corrected separation document that reflects these changes.

BOARD VOTE:

__LS__ _RJW___ __CLG_ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Luther L. Santiful
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084793
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/08/DD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1945/07/02
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 615-365
DISCHARGE REASON Demobilization
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 46 107.0000
2. 61 107.0015
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084107C070212

    Original file (2003084107C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with while serving in the PTO. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to the PH for being wounded in action while serving in New Guinea, but it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087536C070212

    Original file (2003087536C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized to members who are wounded in action. The evidence of record includes an entry in Item 34 of the applicant’s WD AGO 53 that indicates he was wounded in action and an OTSG Hospitalization Record that confirms he was treated for a combat related wound at a medical facility in the Southwest Pacific on 11 May 1945. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016907

    Original file (20080016907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for his exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy while serving in the Pacific Theater of Operations from 12 June 1944 to 2 September 1945 and providing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064848C070421

    Original file (2001064848C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Paragraph 5-11 contains guidance on awarding the World War II Victory Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that this award is authorized to members who served on active duty between 7 December 1941 and 31 December 1946. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the PH for wounds he received in action on 16 November 1944, while serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003616C071029

    Original file (20070003616C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states the FSM's discharge did not indicate he was wounded in the service and he was not awarded the PH for his wounds. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The FSM's Discharge Record provided by the applicant does not include the PH in the list of earned awards and contains the entry “None” in the Wounds Received in Service item, which indicates the FSM was never wounded as a result enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006402C070206

    Original file (20050006402C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM’s separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) contains the entry “AP Theater 24 Mar 44” in Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), and that while the FSM was hospitalized for his war wounds, the PH was awarded to him by a general officer (GO). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056045C070420

    Original file (2001056045C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made required treatment by a medical officer. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the PH for a wound he received in action, on 10 October 1944, while serving as a PFC, in the ETO during World War II;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009240C070206

    Original file (20050009240C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Given that the record confirms the applicant was wounded in action on 14 June 1944, while serving in Myitkyina, Burma, it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002153C070208

    Original file (20040002153C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member participated in while serving in the PTO. The applicant’s claim of entitlement to the PH and the supporting statement he provided were carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066944C070402

    Original file (2002066944C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records show that on 21 November 1942, he was inducted into the Army of the United States. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.