Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084459C070212
Original file (2003084459C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 7 August 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084459


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that the original Optometry Retention Bonus (ORB) he signed in January 2002 be accepted, and that he be paid the $6,000 he should have received for that agreement, based on a contract date of 1 February 2002.

3. The applicant states he submitted his ORB agreement in January 2002 along with a request to open a Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). The TSP was opened as he requested, but he was not paid the $6,000 ORB. When he made inquires into why he didn’t receive his ORB, his Military Personnel Office (MILPO) told him that they “took care of it and to resubmit his ORB contract.”  The applicant complied, but when he still didn’t receive his ORB, he learned that his contract never reached the Office of The Surgeon General (OTSG). At that point, it was too late to process his ORB contract because it was a new fiscal year.

4. In support of his request, he submits a copy of the ORB contract he signed on 29 January 2002.

5. The applicant’s military records show that he entered on active duty on 6 March 1992 and was commissioned as a captain, Medical Service Corps, on 8 March 1992.

6. On the date the applicant submitted his request to the Board, he was serving on active duty as a major.

7. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the OTSG. The OTSG stated that the applicant was, in fact, eligible to execute a $6,000 ORB effective 1 February 2002. When the applicant discovered that his ORB contract had not been received by the OTSG, he resubmitted his request, which was not received within the fiscal year in question. The OTSG continues that it appears that the applicant’s ORB contract may have been lost through no fault of his own. The OTSG recommends that the applicant’s current ORB contract effective date of 20021001 – 20040930 be adjusted to 20020201 – 20040131. The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion and was given an opportunity to respond. He did not respond.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board accepts that the applicant completed an ORB contract in January 2002 and submitted it in a timely manner.

2. As such, the Board agrees with the OTSG that it appears that his ORB contract was lost through no fault of his own.

3. The applicant should not be penalized for events beyond his control.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

         a. showing that the ORB contract effective date of the individual concerned be corrected from 20021001 – 20040930 to 20020201 – 20040131; and

         b. paying to him the $6,000 ORB he should have received for 20020201 – 20030131.

BOARD VOTE:

___mmb_ ____tbr__ ____aao_ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _________Arthur A. Omartian_______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084459
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030807
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.06
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005115

    Original file (20150005115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of his Medical Additional Special Pay (MASP) for physicians for the year 10 July 2014 through 9 July 2015. The applicant is requesting full payment of a 1-year MASP contract at $15,000/year effective 10 July 2014 through 9 July 2015. OTSG rejected the MASP contract, incorrectly stating he was not eligible for any MASP payment since his retirement date was 25 June 2015 and he would not be able to complete the entire year.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608494C070209

    Original file (9608494C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records by adding $3,000 to the existing ISP (incentive special pay) agreement for a total annual amount of $6,000. The Department of Defense Military Pay and Entitlements manual provides that medical officers may be authorized ISP under certain criteria. The evidence of record shows that the applicant signed a 4-year MSP agreement beginning on 15 June 1993 with the linked ISP rate at that time was $3,000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003626

    Original file (20090003626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: electronic mail (e-mail) messages, dated between 31 July 2008 and 27 August 2008; active duty recall orders, dated 8 March 2005 and 27 September 2007; active duty recall orders amendment, dated 4 December 2007; request for ORB, dated 15 November 2005; and Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG) memorandum, subject: Request for ORB, dated 14 December 2005. On 3 June 2009, an advisory opinion was obtained from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609639C070209

    Original file (9609639C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was authorized to renegotiate an MSP (multi-year special pay) agreement beginning 1 October 1995, and requests cancellation of the $3,000 indebtedness incurred due to an overpayment of ISP (incentive special pay). When the ISP rate increased to $6,000, the applicant was erroneously allowed to enter into a new ISP agreement effective 1 October 1995 without renegotiating his MSP agreement thereby incurring a debt in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001164

    Original file (20130001164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 April 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130001164 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive payment of an indefinite Health Professions Officer Board Certification Pay (HPOBCP) contract at $6,000/year retroactive to 26 April 2012. DFAS should provide the applicant all retroactive HPOBCP pay due between 26 April 2012 and 30 September 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008337

    Original file (20090008337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive payment of Multi-year Special Pay (MSP) and Multi-year Incentive Special Pay (MISP) for the period covering 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2011. There is no evidence in the applicant's military records that shows he was authorized MSP in the amount of $25,000.00 or MISP in the amount of $15,000.00 for the period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2011. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001509C070206

    Original file (20050001509C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001509 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The OTSG special pay official states the applicant’s request for a 3-year MSP and linked MSIP of $36,000 for the period 1 October 2002 through 30 September 2005 cannot be supported because the agreements were never...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001509C070206

    Original file (20050001509C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The OTSG special pay official states the applicant’s request for a 3- year MSP and linked MSIP of $36,000 for the period 1 October 2002 through 30 September 2005 cannot be supported because the agreements were never accepted or processed for payment. He further states the applicant is currently receiving payments for his authorized 2-year MSP at $12,000 per year and linked MSIP of $36,000 for the period 1 October 2002 through 30 September 2004; and for a 1-year Incentive Special Pay (ISP)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018459

    Original file (20120018459.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of an annual Health Professions Officer Incentive Pay (HPOIP) for the period 1 October 2011 to 30 September 2012. On 1 June 2012, he submitted a second letter of lateness and contended his 2011 HPOIP contract was late for the same reasons noted above and that he delayed requesting his 2011 HPOIP until after his 2010 HPOIP was paid. A review of the applicant's military pay files show no record of a processed or paid HPOIP agreement for the period 1 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607799C070209

    Original file (9607799C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military records by relieving her of a $12,000 debt created by overpayment of Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995; and by retroactively renegotiating her 4-year Medical Additional Specialty Pay (MASP) agreement by changing the effective date from 1 January 1993 to 1 January 1994. The OTSG recommends that the applicant’s request be denied. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by...