| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Luis Almodova | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Deborah S. Jacobs | Member | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his request for an upgrade of his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) to an Honorable Discharge. There is evidence that the Board denied an earlier application for an upgrade of his discharge on 21 February 1956; however, neither the Memorandum of Consideration nor the case file are available; therefore, the case is reviewed de novo.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he broke his collar bone and shoulder while on duty in service and it is beginning to give him trouble. With his bad conduct discharge, he does not get any benefits and he will need some benefits to be treated at the VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) Hospital. The applicant provided no documentary evidence to support his contentions and application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein was obtained from other records available to this Board.
According to these other records, the applicant enlisted in the Army on 30 March 1954 for 3 years.
On 9 August 1954, the applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) from his unit, the 6th Student Company, Fort Eustis, Virginia, and remained absent until 14 August. On 16 August 1954, he was found guilty by a summary court-martial of being AWOL and was sentenced to forfeit $40.00; to perform hard labor for
10 days; and to be reduced to the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1. The sentence was approved on 16 August 1954.
On 20 September 1954, the applicant underwent a mental evaluation. According to the Certificate of Mental Responsibility, prepared following this evaluation, the applicant was deemed to be, so far free from mental defect, disease, or derangement as to be able to distinguish right from wrong, to adhere to the right, and possessed sufficient mental capacity to understand the nature of the proceedings against him and to intelligently conduct or cooperate in his defense.
On 12 October 1954, he was convicted by a General Court-Martial (GCM) of one charge and three specifications of violation of Article 121, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, larceny. He was sentenced to be confined at hard labor for one year, to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge, and to forfeit all pay and allowances. The sentence was adjudged on 12 October 1954. The approving authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for the bad conduct discharge, total forfeitures and confinement at hard labor for six
months. The applicant was to be confined in the Branch United States Disciplinary Barracks, Camp Gordon, Georgia. The sentence was approved on 26 October 1954.
A Board of Review in the Office of The Judge Advocate General affirmed the sentence on 8 November 1954.
On 3 March 1955, Special Orders Number 35, paragraph 7, were published ordering the applicant to be released from confinement, on 12 March 1955, at the expiration of his sentence. The applicant was discharged on 12 March 1955 in the rank and pay grade of Private, E-1, with a BCD, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-364. He was credited with 5 months and 18 days of active service with 176 days lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
Clemency and restoration to duty were denied the applicant on 24 January 1955 as evidenced in a letter from the Office of the Provost Marshal General.
This Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge on
21 February 1956. Although the Board proceedings are not available, there is evidence that the Board based its determination on the fact that insufficient evidence had been presented to indicate probable material error or injustice.
The statutory authority under which this Board was created, Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, precludes any action by the Board, which would disturb the finality of a court-martial conviction; however, the Board may grant clemency as to the sentence in meritorious cases.
AR 615-364, then in effect, provided for the discharge of enlisted personnel pursuant to an approved sentence of a special or general court-martial imposing a bad conduct discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no corroborating evidence to support his contention that he broke his collarbone and shoulder while he was in service. Notwithstanding the applicant’s alleged need for VA medical benefits, the Board does not normally grant an upgrade of a discharge so that former Army service members can gain access to benefits administered by the Department of Veteran's Affairs.
4. The applicant's available military records and his application contain no matters upon which the Board may grant clemency, and in view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__mhm___ __dsj___ __jam___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003084173 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030520 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19550312 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-364 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A39.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.0000 |
| 2. | 144.6800 |
| 3. | 144.3900 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029864
The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable or general under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel with dishonorable and bad conduct discharges. __________x_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004576C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that clemency be granted in the form of an honorable discharge or a pardon. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to grant service member’s pardons for convictions by a general or special court-martial. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records has no authority to grant the applicant’s request for a pardon.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000777
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000777 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows that during the period of service under review the applicant was AWOL for more than 1 year and 6 months, he had two prior convictions by court-martial, and he was convicted by general court-martial and issued a bad conduct discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072845C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. There is nothing in the available records to support the applicant’s contention that he was eligible for a hardship discharge and was not provided assistance.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050016538C070206
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Meanwhile, the commander submitted a request to have the applicant appear before a board of officers to determine if he should be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 for unfitness due to undesirable habits or traits of character. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001642
He departed the continental United States on 30 October 1952 and he arrived in Japan on 14 November 1952 and Korea on 16 July 1953. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicants record of service included two prior court-martial convictions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709717
APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge and that his “good” service time be shown on his discharge papers. On 19 October 1955, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. On 20 October 1955, the applicant was discharged in the pay grade of E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-638 for unfitness - traits of character rendering retention in the Service undesirable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019610
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, stated an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial imposing dishonorable discharge. His conviction and sentence by general court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709717C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge and that his good service time be shown on his discharge papers. On 19 October 1955, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. On 20 October 1955, the applicant was discharged in the pay grade of E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-638 for unfitness - traits of character rendering retention in the Service undesirable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017703
The military medical officer stated the applicant was undesirable as a Soldier. On 18 January 1956, the applicant's immediate commander requested a board of officers be convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) for the purpose of determining the applicant's fitness for retention. The board found him unfit for retention and recommended his discharge with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.