Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084136C070212
Original file (2003084136C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF
        

         BOARD DATE: 10 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084136

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Roger w. Able Chairperson
Mr. Larry C. Bergquist Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be awarded the Combat Action Ribbon as well as any other awards to which he is entitled based on his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he served with an Army Ranger unit in the RVN from September 1966 through March 1967. He states that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not document this overseas combat service. As a result, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has denied his service connected disability claim.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was inducted into the Army for two years on 18 April 1966. He was trained and served in military occupational specialty 55B (Ammunition Storage Specialist). He continuously served on active duty for two years and was honorably separated on 22 April 1968, by reason of expiration term of service (ETS).

The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he was promoted to the rank of specialist four (SP4) on 13 October 1967, and this was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. The record also shows that he reported to the Reception Station at Fort Jackson, South Carolina on
18 April 1966, for his initial active duty processing. Upon completion of his in-processing, he was immediately assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas, where he remained assigned until his separation on 22 April 1968.

Item 40 (Foreign Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 is blank and contains no entry indicating that he ever served in an overseas area during his tenure on active duty. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) indicates that the only awards he earned during his active duty service were the National Defense Service Medal and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

The applicant’s record documents a disciplinary history that includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on at least two separate occasions. The offenses for which NJP was imposed included a five day period of his being absent without leave (AWOL) between 27 December 1966 and 1 January 1967.

Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, provided that a DD Form 214 would be prepared and issued to all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. It also stipulated that the amount of foreign service listed would reflect the foreign service performed during that specific period of service covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which this service was performed. It also specified that the inclusive dates of any service performed in the RVN would be shown in the Remarks section of the DD Form 214.
Department of Defense Instruction 1348.33 (Military Awards Program) provides that the Combat Action Ribbon was authorized by the Secretary of the Navy on 17 February 1969. It is awarded to members of the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Coast Guard operating under the control of the U.S. Navy in the grade of 0-6 and below who have actively participated in ground or surface combat. The Department of Defense Instruction lists the actions for which the Combat Action Ribbon is authorized beginning with Southeast Asia (1 March 1961) and ending with Operation Desert Storm in 1991. This award is not authorized to be awarded to Army personnel.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that he should be awarded the Combat Action Ribbon for his combat service in the RVN, and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his overseas combat service in the RVN. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support these claims.

2. The applicant is advised that the Combat Action Ribbon is an authorized Navy award, and is awarded to members of the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Coast Guard operating under the control of the U.S. Navy in the grade of 0-6 and below who have actively participated in ground or surface combat. Army award. It is not an authorized Army award, and is not awarded for Army combat service. Therefore, the Board finds that the applicant, even had he served in combat with an Army Ranger unit in the RVN, would not have been eligible to receive the Combat Action Ribbon.

3. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant served in an overseas area during his tenure on active duty. Further, the applicant has failed to provide independent evidence that shows he ever performed combat service in the RVN during his tenure on active duty. Thus, the Board finds no evidentiary basis for correcting his separation document to include the foreign service he claims to have completed.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__BE___ __LB___ ___RA_ _ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084136
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 46 107.0000
2. 251 120.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083125C070215

    Original file (2002083125C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records show that he initially entered the Army on 26 March 1965, and continuously served on active duty until being honorably discharged on 7 October 1969. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned earned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009192

    Original file (20080009192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, the CAR is authorized to be awarded only to members of the United States Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, there are no provisions allowing for award of the CAR to Army personnel. As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support award of any of these combat skill badges to the applicant based on his combat service in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015882

    Original file (20090015882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This DD Form 214 does not show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000974

    Original file (20100000974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Coast Guard Unit Commendation * Combat Action Ribbon * Joint Service Commendation Medal * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Civil Actions Honor Medal with oak leaf cluster * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation with oak leaf cluster * two awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation * Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star and one bronze service star * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Overseas Service Ribbon * Presidential Unit Citation * three overseas service bars 2. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003453

    Original file (20110003453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Department of Defense Instruction 1348.33 (Military Awards Program) states the Combat Action Ribbon was authorized by the Secretary of the Navy on 17 February 1969. He never served with such units in the RVN and he does not qualify for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023836

    Original file (20100023836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record does not contain orders showing he was awarded the Combat Action Ribbon. The applicant's service record is void of evidence which shows he was awarded the Combat Action Ribbon by the Department of the Navy; therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021186

    Original file (20100021186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign. These should also be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, Purple Heart, two bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal, RVN Gallantry Cross with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000334

    Original file (20080000334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. This document also shows that at the time of his assignment to the unit, the unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 48 (1971). The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge document should be corrected to show he held MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), MOS 91B...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009855

    Original file (20110009855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars, Combat Action Ribbon, Valorous Unit Award, and two Overseas Service Bars. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service): Vietnam from 21 October 1969 through his Expiration of Term of Service (ETS); b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the: (1) 137th Engineer Company (Light Engineers) from 25 October 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020477

    Original file (20120020477.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these service bars. The evidence of record also shows he participated in three campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 August 1965 through 26 August 1968; b. deleting award of the VSM with two bronze service stars and one overseas service bar from his DD Form 214;...