| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) and that he elected to enroll in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM never received his 20-year letter.
4. The FSM's military records show that he was born on 29 December 1937. He enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve in February 1956. He and the applicant married on 6 September 1958.
5. In January 2003, the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) found records that contained all of the FSM's retirement point cards. In computing his service, AR-PERSCOM discovered the FSM continued in an active status until 1985 and should have received his 20-year letter in 1976.
6. The FSM died on 3 November 1992 at age 54.
7. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If death occurs before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the annuity.
8. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(f)(1)(B) states that the Secretary concerned shall pay an RCSBP annuity to the surviving spouse of a person who is eligible to provide a reserve component annuity and who dies during the 90-day period beginning on the date he receives his 20-year letter.
9. Title 31 U. S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues. Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U. S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.
10. Pride v. United States, 40 Fed Cl. 730 (1998) provided that if a Board correction gives rise to the claim, the barring statute does not start to run until the Board orders the correction.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows the FSM completed his 20 years of service for a non-Regular retirement in 1976; however, he was never issued a 20-year letter. Because he never received his 20-year letter, he never had an opportunity to enroll in the RCSBP when it was established in 1978 or during subsequent open enrollment seasons.
2. The FSM died in November 1992. AR-PERSCOM has only recently, more than 6 years later, discovered the documents that confirm he was eligible to receive his 20-year letter in 1976.
3. At least one of the reasons behind the barring statute was not of major importance in this case. The applicable records were readily accessible and the FSM’s spouse’s case was not difficult to prove.
4. If the Board directed that AR-PERSCOM prepare a 20-year letter for the FSM, however, the barring statute would not start to run until the correction was ordered. In addition, since it is impossible for the FSM to make an RCSBP election during the 90-day period beginning on the date he would have received his 20-year letter (since the FSM is already deceased), the applicant would automatically be entitled to the RCSBP annuity.
5. The applicant was married to the FSM for the majority of his military career and the FSM earned a 20-year letter. It would be inequitable to deny the applicant the RCSBP annuity because of Government error and the passage of time.
6. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. issuing to the FSM a 20-year letter; and
b. showing that the applicant is entitled to an RCSBP annuity based upon the Board-directed issue of the FSM's 20-year letter and his inability due to death to make an RCSBP election within 90 days of its receipt.
BOARD VOTE:
__wtm___ __le____ _lf_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Walter T. Morrison__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003084100 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030626 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Schneider |
| ISSUES 1. | 135.00 |
| 2. | 137.01 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073900C070403
The applicant states through counsel, in effect, that the FSM did complete and forward his DD Form 1883 early in 1987 but it was lost either by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (now the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM)) or the U. S. Postal Service. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. That...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000391C070208
Since it thus appears the applicant did not give her consent to the FSM's child only coverage RCSBP election, by law the FSM's RCSBP election defaulted to spouse coverage. The FSM did not indicate on the DD Form 1883 which option he desired. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for child only coverage, full base amount, option C but that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060889C070421
By letter dated 21 October 1997, the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informed the applicant that, as the FSM did not make an RCSBP election within 90 days of the date of his 20-year letter, she would not receive an annuity if he died prior to age 60. When the FSM was placed on the TDRL in 1984 after undergoing surgery for lung cancer, he enrolled in the SBP. Considering the FSM’s previous action with regard to enrolling in the SBP, the Board agrees with the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089631C070403
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse and children coverage. She was not aware she could apply for the benefit until a member of the FSM's former Army National Guard unit told her she was eligible for the annuity. The evidence of record shows the FSM was not married at the time he received his 20-year letter and so...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082983C070215
The Retirements and Annuities Section, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) informed the Board Analyst that the applicant applied for the RCSBP annuity but she was denied because they had no record that the FSM ever enrolled in RCSBP. The Board considered the applicant’s request that the records of her deceased spouse be corrected to show he enrolled in the (RCSBP). A DD Form 1883, on file in his military personnel records, shows that he elected to enroll in the RCSBP for full...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084080C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062786C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) and enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for children only coverage, option C. According to TNARNG records, the FSM would have completed his 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay around 4 March 2001. That all of the Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082594C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060258C070421
Records at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) indicate the FSM was mailed a retirement application packet on 8 June 1999 but they have no record of it being returned either as undeliverable or completed for certification. The evidence of record shows that the FSM never applied for retired pay. Although records at AR-PERSCOM show that he was mailed his retired pay application two years prior to his reaching age 60, there was no requirement that he submit the application...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055602C070420
The FSM’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 25 March 1999. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion it is concluded: The FSM received his 20-year letter.