| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Linda D. Simmons | Member | |
| Mr. Robert J. Osborn II | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his discharge under conditions other than honorable be upgraded to under honorable conditions.
2. The applicant states that he was informed that his character of service would be upgraded six months after his discharge.
3. The applicant states that he provides a document from a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital in Memphis, Tennessee; however, there were no documents received with his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error or injustice which occurred on 19 March 1973. The application submitted in this case is dated 10 July 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted in the Army for three years on 25 March 1968, completed training as a supply clerk, and was assigned to an engineer company in Germany. On 3 December 1969 he requested reenlistment and requested a waiver of lost time in order to reenlist. A DA Form 3072 (Request for Waiver of Disqualification for Reenlistment) shows that he received nonjudicial punishment on four occasions, for AWOL (absent without leave), disorderly conduct, missing troop deployment, and missing bed check; and that he had two periods of AWOL, one for six days and the other for 16 days. His request was approved. He was discharged on 7 August 1970 for the purpose of reenlistment. He reenlisted for three years on 8 August 1970.
4. He departed Germany in December 1970 and in February 1971 was assigned to a supply and service company in Vietnam. In November 1971 he returned to the United States. He was assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri in January 1972.
5. The applicant's second enlistment was characterized by nonjudicial punishment on eight occasions, on 8 February 1971 for AWOL, 15 May 1971 for failure to go to his place of duty, 24 June 1971 for disrespect to a noncommissioned officer, 25 January 1972 for AWOL, 18 February 1972 for AWOL, 7 June 1972 for AWOL, 18 October 1972 for AWOL, and 15 November 1972 for wrongfully appropriating a government vehicle, breaking restriction, and drunk driving.
6. On 7 February 1973 the applicant's commanding officer notified the applicant that he was recommending that he be discharged from the Army for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13.
7. The applicant consulted with counsel and stated that he had been advised of the basis for the contemplated action. He waived consideration of his case by a board of officers, and declined to submit a statement in his own behalf. He stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the undesirable discharge under conditions other than honorable that he might receive.
8. On 20 February 1973 the applicant's commanding officer recommended to the separation authority that the applicant be discharged because of his frequent acts of a discreditable nature with military authorities, and recommended that he be discharged for unfitness. On 12 March 1973 the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed that the applicant be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He was discharged on 19 March 1973.
9. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the discharge of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 13 of the regulation provided, in pertinent part, that an individual was subject to separation for unfitness because of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was advised of the effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and VA benefits. He was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf, but he declined to do so.
2. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service. In view of the applicant's numerous acts of indiscipline, it appears that his discharge under other than honorable conditions was warranted.
3. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to support his contention that he was informed that his discharge would be upgraded six months after his discharge. Nonetheless, the Army has no such policy in this respect. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 19 March 1973; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 18 March 1976. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RWA__ __LDS __ __RJO __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003094363 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040318 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008486
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 he received at the end of his 24 July 1971 reenlistment shows he was discharged on 18 April 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 13, due to unfitness frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military or civilian authorities. His records do not show that he ever petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106221C070208
He was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 20 November 1969. On 6 October 1970, the applicant was seen by a psychiatrist who stated that he appeared to have a character disorder of the part for which a discharge from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, would be a most appropriate solution. The Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) indicates that the applicant was discharged on 9 July 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015485
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015485 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to an honorable or a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001521
The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Evidence of record shows that the applicant received two Article 15s, that he was convicted by special court-martial, that he was confined by civil authorities, and that he was AWOL on nine separate occasions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015180C070206
Counsel requests that the applicant's records be corrected by upgrading his discharge to honorable or general. Counsel provides copies of the applicant's DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 7 July 1969 and 30 October 1970; DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 5 November 1974; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his request to extend his overseas assignment; his clearance record; documents showing his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090876C070212
Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show that the applicant’s correct period of creditable service, 2 years, 8 months and 26 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001896C070206
The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant's service records contain the Undesirable Discharge Certificate, dated 17 March 1972, which contain an entry that the actual notice of discharge was not given to the applicant because he was in an AWOL status on the date of the discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 17 March 1972, under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001896C070206
The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 17 March 1972, under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service and issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. The period of service under consideration includes a summary court-martial, a nonjudicial punishment, 94 days of lost time and separation with an Undesirable Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003389
The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 July 1968 for a period of 2 years. d. On 29 May 1972, for being AWOL during the period 25 through 26 May 1972. The record does include a DD Form 214 the applicant was issued on 18 January 1973, the date of his separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073306C070403
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged and that his social security account number (SSAN) and date of entry are incorrect. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army on 25 March 1969 and was honorably separated on 28 April 1970, in pay grade E-3, for the purpose of reenlisting on 29 April 1970. The Board notes that the applicant was almost 21 years of age at the time of his application for discharge.