| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Mae M. Bullock | Member | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.
2. The applicant states that he was informed that his character of service would be upgraded six months after his discharge. His under other than honorable conditions discharge affects his benefits.
3. The applicant provides no evidence to support his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error or injustice which occurred on 27 June 1984. The application submitted in this case is dated 9 July 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted in the Army for four years on 1 August 1978, completed training, and in November 1978 was assigned to a signal company in Germany. He was promoted to pay grade E-4 in December 1979.
4. On 16 September 1981 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for failure to secure an arms room and for failure to go to his place of duty.
5. The applicant returned to the United States and in January 1982 was assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina. On 3 March 1982 he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 August 1978 to 31 July 1981. On 16 July 1982 he reenlisted for three years. In September of that year he was reassigned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri for training in an engineer specialty. He completed the training and in November 1982 was assigned to an engineer company at Fort Polk, Louisiana. In May 1983 he was promoted to sergeant.
6. Two counseling statements completed in the latter months of 1983 show that the applicant's performance of duty was excellent; however, he was counseled on 19 October 1983 for leaving a platoon container and a trailer unsecure, on 4 October 1983 for nonpayment of a debt, on 29 September 1983 for missing formation, and on 12 September 1983 for failure to lay out equipment.
7. On 2 November 1983 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment for dereliction in the performance of his duty, and for failure to go to his place of duty.
8. In February 1984 the applicant underwent drug testing. The results showed that he tested positive for marijuana.
9. On 6 April 1984 the applicant's commanding officer notified the applicant that he intended to initiate action to separate him from the Army for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14. The applicant consulted with counsel and stated that he had been advised of the basis for the contemplated action, its effects, the rights available to him, and the effect of any action taken by him in waiving his rights. He waived consideration of his case by a board of officers and declined to submit a statement in his own behalf. He stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the under other than honorable conditions discharge that he might receive.
10. On 21 May 1984, before a summary court-martial which convened at Fort Polk, the applicant was arraigned, tried, and pled guilty to wrongfully using marijuana.
11. On 30 May 1984 the applicant's commanding officer recommended to the separation authority that the applicant be discharged. On 17 June 1984 the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed that the applicant receive a Discharge Certificate Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. The applicant was discharged on 27 June 1984.
12. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, desertion or absence without leave. Abuse of illegal drugs is serious misconduct. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. An under other than honorable conditions certificate is normally appropriate for a member discharged for misconduct.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was advised of the effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Department of Veterans Affairs benefits. He was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf, but he declined to do so.
2. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
3. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any, to support his contention that he was informed that his character of service would be upgraded six months after his discharge. Nevertheless, the Army has no such policy regarding upgrading a Soldier's discharge. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 27 June 1984; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 26 June 1987. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS __ __MMB__ __PHM__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003094310 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040311 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022846
On 10 May 1984, his commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs. On 7 June 1984, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct and directed the issuance of an Under Other Than...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000186
ARPERCEN Orders Number D-03-901165, dated 6 March 1984, discharged him from the USAR in the rank/grade of private/E-1 effective 6 March 1984 with his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. His available military personnel records are void of documentation that shows: * the circumstances that led to his separation for unsatisfactory participation * he performed any USAR service after 15 April 1982, the date he was transferred to the IRR * he attended annual training...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013680
The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 14 June 1978. On 7 May 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge. He provided no evidence or argument to show his discharge should be upgraded and his military record contains no evidence which would entitle him to an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007031
The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to honorable due to physical disability. Orders Number D-03-901165, dated 6 March 1984, discharged the applicant, in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 from the IRR with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The available evidence of record indicates a board of officers determined in March 1982 that the applicant's unsatisfactory...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009131C070205
Jeffrey Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant was discharged on 12 January 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance. The applicant’s service record shows he received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 on five separate occasions and a bar to reenlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005922
The applicant states: a. This form showed he was hospitalized for 1 day and he was returned to duty on 17 April 1982. The evidence of record does not show and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows he was diagnosed with or treated for any injury/condition while serving on active duty that prevented him from performing his duties and would require referral to an MEB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004969
He states: * a UOTHC discharge seems too severe at the time it was issued based on his military service records * his first years in the military were good and his record of promotions shows he was generally a good service member * his average conduct and efficiency ratings/marks were pretty good * he did not have any problems until he was assigned to Fort Polk * his record of nonjudicial punishments (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) indicate minor offenses 3. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003795
His record does not contain evidence to show he petitioned the U.S. Military Court of Appeals to review his case. Accordingly, on 7 March 1983, the applicant was discharged from active duty in the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020650
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Drill Sergeant Identification Badge and completion of Drill Sergeant School. The applicant's Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) does not contain a DD Form 214 showing his period of active duty service from 8 October 1969 through 19 January 1978. However, there is no available DD Form 214 that shows he completed the Drill Sergeant School in 1974.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013526
The applicant requests: a. correction of his records to show he was medically discharged or b. an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to general under honorable conditions. The applicant provides: * selected service medical records * Army Review Boards Agency correspondence, dated 2 July 2014, with DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552), dated 29 July 2013, with attachments * letter...