Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093683C070212
Original file (03093683C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 09 MARCH 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003093683


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler Chairperson
Ms. Shirley L. Powell Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for award of the Purple Heart.

2. The applicant stated that he lost the little finger on his left hand loading a howitzer while under attack.

3. The applicant provides a copy of a morning report showing that he was attached to the 93d Evacuation [Hospital] in Vietnam on 5 May 1969, and a copy of a morning report showing his return to his unit from that hospital on 12 May 1969.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in Docket Number AR2002070242, on 25 June 2002.

2. The DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) referenced in the 25 June 2002 case clearly shows that he lacerated his little finger between the rammer staff and the breech [of a howitzer] while loading a round on 5 May 1969. He was admitted to the 93d Evacuation Hospital and underwent a partial amputation to the 5th finger of his left hand.

3. On 4 August 1969, Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) published General Orders Number 9446, awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device for heroism on 12 June 1969.

4. The Purple Heart is awarded to any Soldier who has been wounded in action against an enemy of the United States. A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent. The wound for which the award is made must have required treatment by a medical officer and records of medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record.

5. When contemplating an award of the Purple Heart, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary perquisite, but is not the sole justification for the award. Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart include injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action, injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap, and injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological, or nuclear agent. Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart include heat stroke, battle fatigue, accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
:

1. The applicant's submission of morning reports showing that he was hospitalized does not signify that he was wounded in action. The DA Form 2173 clearly indicates that he accidentally injured himself while loading a round into a howitzer. The applicant himself states likewise.

2. The applicant's commander at that time apparently did not deem that his injury warranted award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's contention that he deserves an award of the Purple Heart for an accidental injury some 35 years ago is not now convincing.

3. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.

4. The applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device for heroism on 12 June 1969. That award is not annotated on his DD Form 214. This is an administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished by the ABCMR Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:


________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__SAC__ __SLP___ __BJE __ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR2002070242, dated 25 June 2002.


2. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device for heroism on 12 June 1969. This award is not annotated on his DD Form 214, and is in addition to the Army Commendation Medal awarded to him on 14 June 1969 for meritorious service for the period July 1968 to July 1969, which is annotated on his 28 July 1969 DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board requests that the ABCMR Support Division, St. Louis administratively correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device.





                  __Samuel A. Crumpler____
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003093683
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040309
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088017C070403

    Original file (2003088017C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel for the applicant echoes the applicant's request and in addition asks that the Vietnam Service Medal also be awarded and added to the applicant's DD Form 214. The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show this unit award as an authorized award. a. awarding the applicant the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm; and 2 Overseas Service Bars and adding these awards to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014025

    Original file (20070014025.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Although the applicant injured his knee while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows that the applicant was wounded as the result of a hostile action. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show he was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026181

    Original file (20100026181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, two overseas service bars, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020032

    Original file (20100020032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant's finger injury resulted from an unfortunate accident. Additionally, his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070242C070402

    Original file (2002070242C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show he is entitled to the Purple Heart. NOTE : The Army Review Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis will be requested to provide the applicant with a correction to his separation document which shows he was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal-First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001829C070206

    Original file (20050001829C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was a field hospital somewhere near Omaha Beach. I suppose this was due to a boyscout troop shooting paintballs at us…or was that the result of ENEMY ACTION?” e. “Bringing in the 155 charges for our Howitzers to hold and advance our lines was that ENEMY ACTION?” f. “The resulting injury put me in a FIELD HOSPITAL in France off the line and 50 plus years of 24-7 excruciating pain…pray tell was that the result of ENEMY ACTION?” 6. It states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001829C070206

    Original file (20050001829C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was a field hospital somewhere near Omaha Beach. I suppose this was due to a boyscout troop shooting paintballs at us or was that the result of ENEMY ACTION?” e. “Bringing in the 155 charges for our Howitzers to hold and advance our lines was that ENEMY ACTION?” f. “The resulting injury put me in a FIELD HOSPITAL in France off the line and 50 plus years of 24-7 excruciating pain pray tell was that the result of ENEMY ACTION?” 6. It states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010580

    Original file (20110010580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100022457 on 8 March 2011. Additionally, his records do not contain official orders awarding him the Purple Heart. While the applicant's medical records clearly show he was medically evacuated, admitted to various hospitals, and underwent treatment for perforated ears, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000092C070205

    Original file (20060000092C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, 1st Battalion, 22d Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 54, dated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00534

    Original file (BC-2006-00534.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He never received the award for his injury. Medical entries in the applicant’s military medical records at Exhibit B, and provided by him at Exhibit A, for the period 14 Oct-11 Nov 69 reflect he sustained an injury to his right ring finger from a forklift on 14 Oct 69. A complete copy of the HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit...