| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Robert J. Osborn II | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal.
2. The applicant states that he is entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal. He was recommended for that award. He served with the Transportation Corps 13th Port at the Sub-Port of Fowey. He performed the duties of a commissioned officer while only a private.
3. The applicant provides two Certificates of Merit citations, a copy of correspondence showing that the applicant was entitled to award of a bronze service star to his theater ribbon, a copy of a recommendation for award of the Bronze Star Medal, and a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice which occurred on 31 December 1945. The application submitted in this case is dated 22 May 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there are sufficient documents submitted by the applicant and some remaining records for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
4. The applicant's report of separation shows that he entered on active duty in March 1943, and served in the European Theater of Operations during World War II, arriving overseas in January 1944 and returning to the United States in December 1945. A War Department Battle Casualty Report shows that he was slightly wounded in action in Belgium on 21 February 1945.
5. The applicant was awarded a Certificate of Merit on 3 August 1944 by Headquarters, 13th Port TC (Transportation [Corps or Company]) in recognition of his conspicuously meritorious and outstanding performance of military duty. He was awarded a second Certificate of Merit by Headquarters, Chanor Base Section, for meritorious service in connection with operations against the enemy from 10 May 1944 to 10 September 1944.
6. On 24 August 1944 the Inspector General, Headquarters, 13th Port, recommended that the applicant be awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service during the period 10 May 1944 to 10 September 1944. An endorsement to that recommendation indicates that it was approved by the commander of the Chanor Base Section on 3 September 1945.
7. The applicant was discharged in the rank of Tech 5 (Technician Fifth Class) on 31 December 1945. His report of separation does not reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for the award of the Bronze Star Medal, and states in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal may be awarded for meritorious achievement or service to each member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 6 December 1941, has been cited in orders or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy between 7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945, or whose meritorious achievement has been otherwise confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July 1947.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal and that recommendation was apparently approved; however, the period shown on that recommendation is for the same period as that on the second Certificate of Merit that he received. Officials of the same command approved both the recommendation and the Certificate of Merit. A presumption could be made that the applicant received the Certificate of Merit in lieu of award of the Bronze Star Medal.
2. Nonetheless, he was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal. He received two certificates of merit for his meritorious performance of his duties, and he was wounded in action. The applicant is entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal.
BOARD VOTE:
__JHL___ __LE ___ __RJO __ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091951 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040212 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009784C070208
Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066174C070421
He also provides a copy of a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) issued on 18 January 2001 by the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis showing that the FSM was issued the following awards: the Good Conduct Medal, the European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars and an arrowhead, the World War II Victory Medal, the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany clasp, the Honorable Service Lapel Button WWII, and the Marksman Marksmanship...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010589
The FSM is therefore entitled to correction of his military records to show this foreign unit award. The FSM is therefore entitled to correction of his military records to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart, for wounds he sustained, on 12 August 1944, in combat in France during World War II, and adding this award to his WD AGO Form 53-55; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069744C070402
The applicant states, in effect, that during World War II, he served in combat as an infantryman and was wounded in action. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned earned the Combat Infantryman Badge and American Campaign Medal during World War II; by awarding him the Bronze Star Medal, for exemplary conduct in ground combat against...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005168C070206
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of: a. the Combat Medical Badge; b. the Bronze Star Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster; c. the American Campaign Medal; and d. the Meritorious Unit Commendation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011004
The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), with an effective date of 21 August 1945; Army of the United States Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 21 August 1945; Disabled American Veterans, National Service Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, letter, dated 14 July 2006; and 4 pages of VISTA Electronic Medical Documentation, Progress Notes, printed on 26 January 2006. The applicant was awarded the Combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089881C070403
The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in December 1944 and January 1945 when the Japanese Prisoner of War (POW) ships Oryoku Maru and Enoura Maru were sunk by United States planes. Accordingly, the Board finds that the applicant was entitled to be awarded two awards of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of enemy action on 15 December 1944 and 9 January 1945, while serving in the rank of 1LT and in a POW status. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002722
The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of WD AGO Form 106 (Request for Decoration and/or Citation), dated 5 October 1945, which shows the applicant initiated a claim for award of the Purple Heart for injuries sustained on 4 September 1944. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015012
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015012 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015012
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015012 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was...