| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded.
2. The applicant states he was “a young man with foolish pride” and now realizes how foolish he was at the time of his discharge. He states that if he had to do it all over again he would correct every aspect of his life and as such, is asking forgiveness.
3. The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered active duty on 2 August 1974, approximately 2 months shy of his 18th birthday. His records indicate that he was a high school graduate and had a GT (general technical) aptitude score of 108.
2. The applicant successfully completed basic combat training, although he was punished under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice for leaving his weapon unsecured during field training exercises. In October 1974, following completion of basic training, the applicant was assigned to Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, for advanced individual training (AIT).
3. Between October and November 1974 the applicant accumulated 9 days of AWOL (absent without leave).
4. At the end of November 1974 the applicant was reassigned to Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland for training in a different specialty after not completing his initial training at Redstone Arsenal.
5. The applicant’s records indicate that he did not return to Redstone Arsenal following Christmas break and was placed in an AWOL status effective
6 January 1975. He returned to military control on 31 January 1975 but departed AWOL again on 25 February 1975.
6. On 15 March 1975, while the applicant was still in an AWOL status, he was confined by civilian authorities for burglary. He was convicted by civilian authorities in July 1975 and sentenced to 4 years confinement. He escaped from civilian confinement on 2 September 1975 and on 19 June 1979 he surrendered to military authorities.
7. When charges were preferred for the AWOL period 6 January 1975 to
30 January 1975 and for the period 25 February 1975 to 18 June 1979, the applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10. His request acknowledged he understood the nature and consequences of the undesirable discharge, which he might receive. He indicated he understood he could be denied some or all veterans' benefits as a result of his discharge and that he may be deprived of rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law. He did not submit any statements on his own behalf.
8. The medical history, which he submitted for his medical examination for separation, indicated he suffered from depression and excessive worry. However, the physician found him qualified for separation with a physical profile of 1 1 1 1 1 1.
9. A mental health evaluation found the applicant fully alert and oriented, his memory good, and his thought process clear and normal. It determined the applicant was mentally responsible, able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right.
10. He was returned to civilian authorities on 3 July 1979 and was placed in an excess leave status.
11. The applicant’s request for discharge was approved and on 25 July 1979 he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10. He had 6 months and 5 days of creditable service and more than 1600 days of lost time.
12. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s contention that he regrets the actions of his youth is understandable, however, the evidence does show that the applicant successfully completed basic combat training, which is an indication that he was capable of honorable service despite his youth. The fact that he now regrets the events that resulted in his under other than honorable conditions discharge is not sufficient to warrant an upgrade of the character of that discharge.
2. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__SAC __ __SLP __ __BJE __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091498 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040309 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080002C070215
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show he was inducted on 1 August 1968, as a field artilleryman. On 22 March 1971, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows that he was attached pending approval/disapproval of his request for a hardship discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710591C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710591
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Although the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090936C070212
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge, that his reenlistment code be changed to RE (Reenlistment Eligibility) Code 1 and that the reason for his discharge be changed to, "for the convenience of the Government." Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The Board noted that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017270
The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 9c (Authority and Reason) to reflect the authority and reason for his separation * Item 9e (Character of Service) from under other than honorable conditions discharge * Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show letters of recommendation from the company commander, boot camp at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019272
The applicant provides: a. a copy of a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim); b. a copy of Special Order Number 151, Headquarters, The United States Army Medical Training Center (USAMTC), Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 18 July 1969, assigning him to the US Army Overseas Replacement Station, Oakland, CA, not later than 19 August 1969, for transfer to Vietnam; and c. a copy of an Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs Form 200. The record shows the applicant never reported to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007552
The applicant states that item 18b (Prior Active Service) on his DD Form 214 does not indicate his training in MOS 35F2O at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama or his training in the USMAPS at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, states that item 27 (Remarks) would list formal in-service training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends, as an exception to policy,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013202
The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. On 2 December 1981, the applicant requested a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). The evidence of record also shows that the applicant failed to complete the training he requested when he enlisted in the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081095C070215
The applicant’s military records show that, on 10 July 1968, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and airborne training. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he had completed 2 years, 9 months and 3 days of creditable active military service and he had 252 days of lost time due to being AWOL and in military confinement. Department of the Army Message DAPE-MPP 102035Z Dec 71, the authority for the applicant's discharge is no longer available; however, the Board presumes regularity in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027901
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 11 July 1979, the appropriate separation authority voided his 1976 enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-15a(1), based on his concealment of his 1975 discharge under other than honorable conditions. His military records contain no evidence which would entitle him to an upgrade of his 1975 discharge.