| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. Robert L. Duecaster | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer) be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as Sergeant E-5, instead of the CPL (Corporal) E-4 rank and pay grade shown.
2. The applicant states that he assume that a typographical error was made. He did not realize the error until he filed a claim with his state representative.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of the 26 May 1970 order effecting his assignment to a transfer point.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 12 June 1970. The application submitted in this case is dated 2 May 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 13 June 1968, completed training as an artilleryman, and in November 1968 was assigned to an artillery battery in Vietnam, where he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device for heroism and another Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service. He was promoted to Corporal on 13 July 1969. He returned to the United States, and in December 1969 was assigned to an artillery battery at Fort Sill, Oklahoma.
4. On 24 March 1970 the applicant's commanding officer recommended that the applicant be promoted to Sergeant, at the same time stating that there was no position vacancy for a Sergeant in the applicant's specialty, and that he understood that the applicant might be required to change duty positions in order to be promoted in a position vacancy. The applicant appeared before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion by the board members.
5. On 21 May 1970 the applicant underwent a medical evaluation prior to his release from active duty. The report of that evaluation reflects his rank and pay grade as Sergeant E-5, as does the report of medical history that he furnished for that examination.
6. Documents in the applicant's OMPF (Official Military Personnel File), some of which he completed, dated in May 1970 and prior to the 21 May 1970 date on the above-mentioned medical reports, show his rank and pay grade as Corporal E-4.
7. On 26 May 1970 Headquarters, 8th Battalion (155mm) (SP), 17th Infantry, the applicant's parent unit, published an order awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal. His grade on that order is shown as E4. On that same date, the above-mentioned unit published an order assigning him to a transfer point for separation processing. His grade on that order is shown as E5.
8. On 9 June 1970 the applicant completed a debriefing certificate, indicating on that document his rank and pay grade as Sergeant E-5.
9. On 10 June 1970 Headquarters, United States Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill published an order releasing the applicant from active duty on 12 June 1970 and assigning him to the Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) at St. Louis. His rank on that order is shown as Corporal.
10. The applicant's 12 June 1970 DD Form 214 shows his rank and pay grade as Corporal E-4, and his date of rank as 13 July 1969.
11. The applicant's OMPF does not contain an order promoting him to Sergeant.
12. On 22 May 1974 the Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center published an order discharging the applicant from the Army Reserve Control Group (Standby) effective on 1 June 1974. His rank on that order is shown as Sergeant.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was recommended for promotion by members of a promotion board in March less than three months prior to his release from active duty. The applicant's DD Form 214 and the order releasing him from active duty, however, show his rank and pay grade as Corporal E-4, indicating that, although recommended, he had not been promoted to Sergeant.
2. Nonetheless, his medical evaluation reports prepared one month prior to his release from active duty, the 9 June 1970 debriefing certificate, and the order published by his parent unit assigning him to a transfer point, show his rank as Sergeant E-5.
3. It is probable that the applicant was promoted to Sergeant E-5, but that the order reflecting his promotion did not make its way into his OMPF prior to his release from active duty; consequently, those persons responsible for publishing his separation order and preparing his DD Form 214 had no way of knowing that he was promoted, and consequently, prepared those documents showing his rank as Corporal, pay grade E-4.
4. The applicant's contention that he was promoted to Sergeant E-5 prior to his release from active duty is credible, notwithstanding the lack of any promotion order. Any doubt should be resolved in his favor.
5. Correcting the applicant's records to show that he was promoted to Sergeant, requires a date of rank for that grade. Since evidence is lacking concerning his promotion date, an arbitrary date must be established. The earliest dated documents showing his rank as Sergeant E-5 are the above-mentioned medical reports, dated 21 May 1970. Consequently, it would be appropriate to use that date as his date of rank as a Sergeant, pay grade E-5.
6. Therefore, the applicant's 12 June 1970 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that the applicant was released from active duty in the rank and pay grade of Sergeant E-5 with a date of rank of 21 May 1970.
BOARD VOTE:
__RJW__ ___MHM_ __RLD __ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091020 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040219 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002051
On 6 June 1970, he was recommended for promotion to SSG/E-6. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was promoted to SSG/E-6 prior to his honorable release from active duty on 24 June 1970. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000347C070205
There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he was appointed as corporal to serve in a position vacancy which existed in his unit, prior to his release from active duty. There also is no evidence in the available records to show that he was advanced or promoted higher than pay grade E-4 prior to his release from active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 15 April 1970; therefore, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007795
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a temporary duty (TDY) assignment in Vietnam. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was appointed to the temporary rank of SP5, effective 13 December 1968. Although he provided unit orders which show he was appointed as an acting NCO to the grade of SGT on 11 July 1969, the entry in item 33 of his DA Form 20 shows his appointed grade to SGT was lined out.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166
Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011873
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 30 September 1970, to show he was retired in the rank of major (O-4) and that he was awarded the Silver Star. On 29 September 1970, Special Orders Number 189 were published discharging him from his enlisted status effective 30 September 1970 and placing him on the Retired List in the rank of major effective 1 October 1970. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014253
These awards are currently recorded on his DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry in Item 5a of his DD Form 214 and adding the entry "SGT"; b. deleting the entry "SM" from his awards; and c. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * RVN Gallantry Cross with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088923C070403
There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records to indicate that he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of Specialist Five, E-5. He attained the rank and pay grade of Specialist Four, E-4, was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for his Vietnam service, the Combat Medical Badge for performance of his assigned duties in a hostile fire area under combat conditions, and there is no record of lost time or any evidence of a lapse in good conduct in the applicant's service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006018
On 4 April 1969, the U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, OK, published Special Orders Number 94 ordering his separation from the Regular Army, effective 25 April 1969. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a cross-reference. However, on 19 March...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017300
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank of Sergeant (SGT) E-5. The applicant states his records show he was discharged in the rank of Corporal (CPL) E-4 but he was promoted and was serving in the rank of SGT, E-5 at the time of his separation. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610289C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his rank on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed from SP5 (Specialist Five) pay grade E-5 to Sergeant E-5. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant was promoted to Specialist Five effective and with a date of rank of 25 September 1969. Orders of 21 October 1970 awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal show his rank as SP5.