Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083137C070215
Original file (2002083137C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:



         BOARD DATE: 29 JULY 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002083137

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant is requesting that the records of her deceased ex-husband, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to convert his Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) to Veteran's Group Life Insurance (VGLI) subsequent to his discharge from the Mississippi Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army on 15 October 1996; and that his minor children receive the annuities from the VGLI.

APPLICANT STATES: That the 22 March 2001 Board acted favorably in correcting the FSM's records to show that he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Program (RCSBP) on 1 December 1996 for his dependent children. She states that if the FSM had been properly discharged, e.g., with notification that he would receive retired pay at age 60, and given all the information concerning benefits, he would have elected to convert his SGLI to VGLI and designated his minor children as beneficiaries.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in proceedings prepared to reflect the Board's consideration of the case (AR2000047968) on 22 March 2001. That Board determined that had the FSM's retirement points been verified at the proper time, he would have been eligible to receive his 20-year letter in late 1996, and as such, would have enrolled in the RCSBP for dependent children coverage to financially protect his young children had he been given the opportunity to do so.

The FSM's records contain a SGLV 8286 (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate), dated 11 November 1995. That document shows that he elected an insured amount of $200,000.00, and that he designated as his beneficiaries his wife (the applicant), his two daughters and his son, with the annuity to be paid in equal amounts to each. His NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) dated 15 October 1996 indicates that he had SGLI coverage in the amount of $200,000.00.

Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) is a program of low cost group life insurance for service members on active duty, ready reservists, etc., and is available in $10,000.00 increments up to a then maximum of $200,000.00. SGLI is in effect during the period of such duty and for 120 days following separation or release from such duty. SGLI participants can convert their full-time SGLI coverage to term insurance under the VGLI program upon release from the service, release from the Army Reserve or National Guard, or transfer to the Retired Reserve.

Veterans’ Group Life Insurance (VGLI) is a program of post-separation insurance which provides for the conversion of SGLI to 5-year renewable term insurance. VGLI is issued in multiples of $10,000.00 up to a then maximum of $200,000.00, but not for more than the amount of SGLI the member had in force at the time of separation from service. An individual may apply for VGLI, without evidence of good health, within 120 days of separation, transfer to the Retired Reserve, discharge, etc. Application may also be made for up to one year from the end of the 120-day SLGI extension; however, evidence of good health may be required.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant has not provided any evidence to support her contention that the FSM would have converted his SGLI to VGLI had he received notification that he would receive retired pay at age 60. Whether or not he received such notification, he could have converted his SGLI to VGLI within the 120 day period subsequent to his transfer to the Retired Reserve. The Board notes, that unlike the RCSBP, in which the FSM did not have the opportunity to enroll, he had ample opportunity to convert his SGLI to VGLI after his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Her contention that the FSM did not convert because he had not received the proper notification is speculative, and has no basis in fact.
The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of her request.

2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION
: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP__ __WTM__ __TEO __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002083137
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030729
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 101.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004273C070205

    Original file (20060004273C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 November 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060004273 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 10 (SGLI Coverage) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 28 September 2002, be corrected to show the amount...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090860C070212

    Original file (2003090860C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter to her from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command dated 3 April 2003; the FSM's death certificate; the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) with counseling letter; the FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter); a North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) letter dated 14 November 1999; the FSM's Retired Reserve certificate dated 12 August 1988; the FSM's Honorable Discharge certificate dated 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074969C070403

    Original file (2002074969C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, through counsel, that the settlement agreement, which was incorporated into the 29 July 1999 divorce decree, required the FSM to elect former spouse SBP coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007591

    Original file (20090007591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It advised him that he had only 90 days to submit his election or he would not be entitled to RCSBP coverage until he applied for retired pay at age 60. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through the ABCMR. The applicant contends that the government should have notified her that the FSM declined to elect coverage under the RCSBP and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002274

    Original file (20150002274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. She was never sent an application or given any other information. She contacted the SGLI office requesting they grant her an exception to submit an application for VGLI. The available evidence shows her 20-year letter states in paragraph 5, "Reserve Soldiers who have completed 20 years of qualifying service for retirement may be eligible for the Veteran's Group Life Insurance Program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001875

    Original file (20140001875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he elected to enroll in the Veterans' Group Life Insurance (VGLI) and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). After 121 days, the individual may be granted VGLI provided an initial premium and evidence of insurability are submitted within 1 year after termination of the individual's SGLI coverage. Since there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence showing he enrolled in the VGLI, regrettably, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007450

    Original file (20080007450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM subsequently died on 26 December 2004; d. the FSM did not keep her SGLI at the time of her discharge since she did not know of her terminal cancer. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities using the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The DVA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for the military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003349

    Original file (20070003349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum stated that the amount due was based on the amount of coverage the individual elected. After 121 days, the individual may be granted VGLI provided an initial premium and evidence of insurability are submitted within one year after termination of the individual's SGLI coverage. The evidence shows that the applicant completed an SGLI Election Certificate on 14 July 1996, and elected not to participate in the SGLI program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002825

    Original file (20090002825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon recommendation from the U.S. Army Claims Service, the applicant contends that he should be entitled to extraordinary relief by this Board for the death of the FSM due to alleged errors on the part of the military medical community during her period of active duty service. The evidence of record shows that the FSM was properly discharged from the U.S. Army on 31 July 2001 due to her physical disability. Nearly one year after the FSM's separation, in June 2002, she was diagnosed with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009086C080213

    Original file (20070009086C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that item 22c does not show his service in Japan (1948 to 1950), Korea (July to September 1950), or Germany (1952 to 1955); that he did not stop his insurance allotment, and he believes his insurance is still in effect; that his VA claim number is 2------2; that his career began with 11 years of schooling, but he earned his GED (general equivalency diploma) in 1951 and had two years of college credits before he retired; and that his blood group is “A” positive. The...