| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones | Member |
2. The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his military career ended due to the combat injuries he received in the defense of this nation. He contends that upon his departure from Vietnam he was told that a recommendation for award of the Purple Heart was submitted for injuries sustained in the rocket attack and subsequent vehicle accident on 16 February 1969. At the time of his disability retirement in 1973 he was still under the impression that the paperwork submitted in 1969 was just slow in getting processed and he had faith in the system that he would receive the Purple Heart. However, several years after his retirement he found out about a policy made by the command of the 5th Special Forces Group where the majority of awards and decorations submitted in Vietnam came to a halt. He states at that point he petitioned the Army Board for Correction of Military (ABCMR) for award of the Purple Heart; however, his request was denied by the ABCMR on 13 January 1988.
4. The applicant contends that it has taken him 13 years to obtain new evidence which substantiates the requirements of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) pertaining to the Purple Heart. He points out that the regulation states that an injury caused by a vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire is an example of an enemy-related injury which clearly justifies award of the Purple Heart. He also points out that the regulation states that if an individual is injured as a result of a vehicle accident caused by enemy fire the decision to award the Purple Heart would be made in favor of the individual.
5. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a Memorandum of Consideration prepared to reflect the consideration of Docket Number AC86-07090 by the ABCMR on 13 January 1988. The ABCMR denied the application based on failure to timely file.
6. In support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart, the applicant submits
18 enclosures (37 pages) which are listed on pages 1 and 2 of his continuation sheet of his application.
7. A Line of Duty determination, dated November 1972, shows the applicant was injured on 16 February 1969 in a jeep accident which resulted from an enemy rocket attack.
8. The applicant's PEB Proceedings, dated 30 November 1972, show the applicant sustained a crushing injury to his left leg and foot in a jeep accident on
16 February 1969 in Vietnam.
9. The applicant's submissions are new evidence and will be considered by the Board.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The regulation also states that an injury caused by a vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire is an example of an enemy-related injury which clearly justifies an award of the Purple Heart.
11. Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth the policy and procedures for the ABCMR. It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence (including but not limited to any facts or arguments as to why relief should be granted) that was not in the record at the time of the Board’s prior consideration. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.
12. Army Regulation 15-185 provides further guidance for reconsideration requests that are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case. In such cases, the staff of the Board will review the request to determine if substantial relevant evidence has been submitted that shows fraud, mistake in law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or if there exists substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s original decision. If the staff finds such evidence, the case will be resubmitted to the Board. If no such evidence is found, the application will be returned without action.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that an injury caused by a vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire is an example of an enemy-related injury which clearly justifies an award of the Purple Heart.
2. The LOD determination shows the applicant was injured in a jeep accident resulting from an enemy rocket attack on 16 February 1969 in Vietnam. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his military records to show this award.
3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below would rectify an injustice.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned be awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained as a result of hostile action on 16 February 1969 in Vietnam.
BOARD VOTE:
MKP____ REB____ FCJ_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_Margaret K. Patterson
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002083056 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | Yes |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030624 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011363
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. Colonel (COL) J____ B. P____'s strict interpretation of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) which, in effect, denied him award of the Purple Heart by stating he was not injured as a result of enemy action, but as a result of running into the door during the rocket attack on 26 May 1968, is not true. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016507
Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record: a. Notwithstanding his sincerity as well as that of his buddies, in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014948
Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100025460, on 3 May 2011. On or about 16 August 1968, he was hospitalized in Vietnam. The ABCMR will decide cases on the evidence of record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010710
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010710 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, he was wounded in Vietnam and he now has a statement from the skipper of the river boat at the time. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017793
He served in Vietnam from 8 June 1969 to 11 January 1970. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002500
The applicant states he sustained injuries as a direct result of an MVA caused when his driver swerved to avoid rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) fire from enemy combatants. The medical documentation and sworn statements show he was treated for injuries due to a vehicle accident and not injuries caused by the enemy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in Balad,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014273
The applicant requests two awards of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) to show the two awards and the Bronze Star Medal. c. As for the June 1970 injury, again there is no evidence of an injury or that such injury occurred as a result of hostile action, and there is also no evidence he was treated or that his treatment was made a matter of official record. There is no evidence in the available records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012493
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015467
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021655
On 6 August 1969, the helicopter he was on, as a crewmember, was shot down by the enemy in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.