Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082922C070215
Original file (2002082922C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 9 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082922

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Vic Whitney Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Eloise C Prendergast Member
Mr. Robert J. Osborn Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the period 14 July through 19 December 1970 be credited as Army Reserve (USAR) service with sufficient number of retirement points for an additional 5 months and 4 days qualifying service for retirement.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was originally appointed in the Air Force Reserve (USAFR). When he was ordered to active duty for 2 years he elected to accept an Army Reserve appointment because of the shortage of Army doctors. After serving his 2 years active duty he was discharged and not provided information on performing USAR service. He was reappointed in the USAFR effective 30 September 1987 and would like credit for the 5 months and 4 days needed for an additional year of qualifying service. He submits copies of his military records and his USAFR retirement point's history in support of his application.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 28 July 1966, he volunteered for appointment in the USAFR with a 2-year active duty commitment. Effective 19 December 1966, he was appointed a Medical Corps first lieutenant in the USAFR. On his pre-active duty physical of 18 September 1967 he listed mumps, appendicitis, and recurrent back pain as his only medical complaints. He was found physically and mentally qualified for active duty.

On 19 April 1968, he was issued a conditional release from the USAFR for the purpose of obtaining an appointment in the USAR. Effective 7 June 1968 he was appointed a Medical Corps first lieutenant in the USAR. He entered active duty in the rank of captain on 15 July 1968 and was assigned to Fort Dix, New Jersey.

On 14 March 1969 orders were issued assigning the applicant to Vietnam. On 14 March 1969 the applicant completed a medical statement of physical condition stating that, although he was physically qualified for military service on the date of his last physical examination in March 1968, he had been receiving psychiatric treatment for a neurosis severe enough to have precluded his active duty service.

Although he only had a 2-year active duty commitment, on 15 April 1969, he requested a 1-year deferment from assignment to Vietnam. He related that he had been seen by a psychiatrist since May 1968 for acute reactive depression and required further therapy. The commander of the hospital recommended disapproval based on no valid medical reason for the deferment. The applicant was again placed on orders for Vietnam.

On 26 May 1969 the applicant again requested deferment for assignment to Vietnam. This request was based on his wife's pregnancy, her emotional immaturity, and extreme dependence on the applicant. His wife was also reported to be suffering from anxiety and depression. His request was again disapproved and he was again placed on orders for Vietnam.

On 17 July 1969 the applicant requested discharge on the grounds that he should have been medically disqualified for military service. He stated that he was not medically acceptable at the time of his entrance on active duty based on his civilian doctor's diagnosis of depressive psychoneurosis, reaction depression, and immature personality that rendered him marginally unable to engage in his civilian medical practice. He stated that he had never received a psychiatric examination from the Army to determine his fitness to serve.

On 25 July 1969 a Medical Corps major designated as a psychiatrist examined the applicant. The resulting diagnosis was passive aggressive personality, chronic, moderate, manifested by passive obstructionism, argumentativeness, poorly controlled, anxiety under stress, poor self-image, and immature judgment. His impairment for further military duty was judged as moderate and it was noted that his condition existed prior to military service. The applicant was psychiatrically cleared for any action deemed appropriate and found fit for duty.

A Recommendation for Promotion of Officer form was prepared on 28 April 1970. The Chief, Department of Clinics recommended that the applicant not be promoted to major based on his unwillingness to serve in Vietnam. His duty performance was rated as average and uninspired. The approving official, the hospital commander, also noted the applicant's average duty performance and success in delaying assignment to Vietnam.

On 3 June 1970, orders were issued to discharge the applicant from active duty effective 14 July 1970 by reason of officer resignation. On his 15 June 1970 Report of Medical History for his separation medical examination the applicant now listed color blindness, frequent headaches, frequent colds, pressure in chest, palpitation in the heart, indigestion, stomach trouble, reactions to medicine, piles or rectal disease, recent weight gain, motion sickness, trouble sleeping, frequent nightmares, depression, nervous trouble, and that he had a history of a stammer or stutter. He was found qualified for separation with a character and behavior disorder.

On 6 July 1970, the applicant signed a statement acknowledging his unqualified resignation on the day of his release from active duty. Effective 14 July 1970, the applicant was discharged as a captain by reason of resignation under the authority of Army Regulation 635-100, and not transferred to the USAR. He was credited with 2 years of active duty.



The USAFR retirement point's statement provided by the applicant shows his final retirement year on active duty from 19 December 1969 through 14 July 1970. The period from 15 July 1970 through 29 September 1987 is shown as a break in service.

Army Regulation 140-185 provides the policy for training and retirement point credits for members of the USAR. There are no provisions for providing retirement point credits to former service members who have no military status at the time.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant voluntarily entered military service with an acknowledged
2-year active duty commitment. While on active duty he exercised his rights to avoid service in Vietnam. When he exhausted all other appeals the applicant tendered his unqualified resignation, which terminated his military service.

2. The applicant was without any military status during the time period he is requesting this Board to declare creditable for retirement purposes.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rvo____ __ecp__ __rjo__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082922
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031009
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.02
2. 135.03
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090340C070212

    Original file (2003090340C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The application submitted in this case is dated 25 April 2003. The applicant submitted an application for Retired Pay Benefits (DD Form 108) to the Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (RCPAC) requesting his Retired Pay to be effective 6 April 1984. A review of the applicant's records shows that the applicant was informed in 1972, when he was discharged from the USAFR that he would be unable to attain retirement eligibility by age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004899

    Original file (20150004899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An SF 600, dated 2 September 1972, shows the applicant complained of nervousness and was prescribed Librium. There is no evidence to show he was unable to perform his assigned duties. However, the evidence of record shows that his chain of command considered his previous service and he received a general discharge under honorable conditions rather than a discharge under other than honorable conditions which was normally considered appropriate in a chapter 10 Separations when a Soldier was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019462

    Original file (20110019462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019462 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This form also shows his character of service as "Under Conditions Other Than Honorable." Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000544

    Original file (20120000544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was retired due to a physical disability. The VA summary of benefits, provided by the applicant, reports that effective 1 April 2011 the VA found him to be permanently physically disabled due to service connection rated at 90 percent disabling. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was discharged from military service as a result of his tendering an unqualified resignation, and not due to a physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013174

    Original file (20130013174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum informed the FSM that he was 22 to 27 pounds over the weight standards prescribed in Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program). (3) ARPC 600-E which shows he served in the: (a) Regular Army from 1 February 1967 to 30 April 1971 and was credited with 5 good years for retirement (50 or more retirement points per year). * 1 May 1971 to 30 April 1972: 15 points * 1 May 1972 to 2 October 1972: 6 points (c) ARNG from 9 December 1972 to 4 March 1978 and was credited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008938

    Original file (20130008938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His discharge resulted in a general under honorable conditions characterization of service, which is inappropriate for the following reasons: * He suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during and after his three combat tours in Vietnam * He was being treated and assessed for mental and emotional problems in the years prior to his final discharge from service * His mental and emotional problems, which stemmed from his PTSD, made further service in the Army impossible * At the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022659

    Original file (20110022659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a letter from the Incarcerated Veterans' Consortium, Inc. * power of attorney * a Standard Form 502 (Clinical Record – Narrative Summary) * police reports * a letter * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * a page from the Summary of Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) Hearing * civilian medical records * several character-reference letters CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The same letter shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015645

    Original file (20100015645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was credited with 16 years, 5 months and 13 days of qualifying education and/or experience at the time of his appointment as a medical officer in the USAR. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-Regular Service) implements statutory authorities governing the granting of "retired pay" to Soldiers and former RC Soldiers: a. Paragraph 2-1a states to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014713

    Original file (20080014713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show creditable service for his active duty service in 1970 and 1991. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military service records should be corrected to show creditable service for his active duty service in 1970 and 1991 and requests an explanation regarding the calculation of his retired pay. Thus, the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s military personnel records properly document this active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702760

    Original file (9702760.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-0 Qq$)lg 1999 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Effectiveness Report (OER) closing 29 July 1966 be investigated and removed from his records and that he be provided a list of agencies that have had access to this effectiveness report or abstracts therefrom since it was filed. However, other than applicant’s own assertions, we find that no...