Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082568C070215
Original file (2002082568C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 11 September 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002082568

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Stanley Kelley Chairperson
Mr. John T. Meixell Member
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his rank and date of rank (DOR) be corrected to show chief warrant officer two (CW2/W-2), effective 10 November 1982, with eligibility to received Reserve Retirement as a CW2.

APPLICANT STATES: That he never received his promotion to CW2 and was informed that it was due to his excess status and/or units failure to submit the appropriate documentation. In support of his application, he submits copies of his: National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); appointment orders; five Officer Evaluation Reports (OERs); and his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II).

In support of his application, he submits an additional statement. He states that he was initially appointed effective 11 November 1980 and according to regulation at that time he would have been eligible for promotion to CW2. His records indicate that all of his OERs were well above average and there was no record of any adverse personnel action that would delay or deny his promotion.

His unit was reorganized which resulted in his position being eliminated and was placed in an excess status. However, he was approaching 20 years of service and permissions was granted for him to remain in an excess status until he completed 20 years of qualifying service for transfer to the inactive Reserve.

He was informed that his excess status was the reason for his denial for promotion; however, later this year, a former retired service member informed him that this was perhaps untrue.

He completed 11 years of active duty service with two tours in Vietnam and was awarded several awards. He now requests that this Board consider his service, the recorded reason to deny his promotion, and grant his request.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 August 1965. He continued to serve until honorably discharged on 1 September 1976, in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant (SSG/E-6). On 2 September 1976, he enlisted in the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG). He continued to serve until honorably discharged on 1 September 1977.

After a break in service, he reenlisted in the KYARNG on 29 July 1978, in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6. He continued to serve until he was honorably discharged on 13 November 1980, in order to accept a warrant officer (WO1) appointment. On 14 November 1980, he was appointed as a WO1 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 741A0.



The applicant's records contain several endorsements to the basic letter, Subject: Excess Warrant Officer Due to Reorganization, which is unavailable for review by this Board. The endorsements indicated that the letter was forwarded for: immediate compliance; that the applicant was carried as excess and would be terminated on 31 December 1984, unless granted a waiver; that there were no
available warrant officer vacancies for the applicant in the battalion over the past year; discovered that he had completed over 18 years of service and would complete 20 years on 29 July 1986; and was forwarded for approval. The endorsement also indicated that he be retained in an active status to complete 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes and that a vacancy was not anticipated at that time in the KYARNG in his MOS. The Chief, Officer Branch, Army Personnel Division of the National Guard Bureau confirmed the applicant's extension to allow him the opportunity to complete 20 years of creditable service for retirement purposes.

The applicant's records contain a copy of a recommendation for promotion from his supervisor, dated 18 August 1985, which was not signed.

The applicant's records contain a copy of a recommendation for promotion to CW2/W-2, by his commander; however, this document is undated. This recommendation indicated that the applicant was excess and that he had demonstrated his fitness for the responsibilities and duties of the position for which recommended.

The applicant was retained through 29 July 1986 in order to complete 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes.

On 3 October 1986, the Kentucky Adjutant General notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter).

On 14 October 1986, the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

On 14 October 1986, orders were published separating the applicant from the KYARNG, effective 20 October 1986 and was transferred to the Retired Reserve, in the rank and pay grade of W01/W-1.

The applicant provided five OERs, which he stated, were well above average reports.






National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) governs policies and procedures for Army National Guard (ARNG) warrant officer personnel management. It states, in pertinent part, that promotions will be accomplished only when an appropriate modified table of organization and equipment (MTOE) or table of distribution and allowances (TDA) position vacancy exist in the unit. It also provided that in order to be qualified for promotion to CW2, an individual must have completed the basic military education requirements and 3 years time in grade (TIG) as a W01.

Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR soldiers. Chapter 7 of the regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from an active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant's records clearly show that he was appointed on 14 November 1980, in the grade of W01 in the KYARNG.

2. A basic request was prepared on the applicant, Subject: "Excess Warrant Officer Due to Reorganization." However, this document was unavailable for review. Records show the basic letter was endorsed through channels and indicated that the applicant was carried as excess and would be terminated unless granted a waiver. The evidence shows that there were no vacancies for the applicant in the battalion over the past year.

3. The evidence revealed that the applicant had completed over 18 years of service and would complete 20 years on 29 July 1986. Approval was granted to retain the applicant in an active status to complete 20 years of service for retirement purposes.

4. The applicant's records show that his supervisor prepared a recommendation for promotion, that was not signed, and a recommendation from his battalion commander, that was undated. The recommendation indicated that the applicant was excess and that he had demonstrated his fitness for the responsibilities and duties of the position for which recommended.





5. The Board notes the applicant's contention; however, the applicant was clearly informed in writing that he was excess and that a position was not available in his unit. He was afforded the opportunity to be retained to complete time in service for retirement purposes and was transferred to the Retired Reserve after completing 20 years of qualifying service, in the rank and pay grade of W01/W-1.

6. Based on the foregoing and in accordance with regulation, the applicant was not entitled to promotion to CW2 or transfer to the Retired Reserve in the rank of CW2. The evidence contained in the applicant's records show that proper documentation was submitted and complied with.

7. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

8. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__sk___ __jm___ ___cp____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002082568
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030911
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19861020
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-101/ar 140-10
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 21
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012104

    Original file (20130012104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Paragraph 7 governs the transfer orders for Soldiers who are accepted in the SWVA and nowhere does it state what the Assign/loss reason should be “is accordance with the subsequent SIDPERS entry.” He believes being coded an (IL) Individual Request for the SWVA process violates the intention of the policy to fill vacancies unable to be filled by the enlisted promotion policy. c. Section V (Termination): (1) paragraph 1, in part, states "Incentives will not be terminated for the following...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027773

    Original file (20100027773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through the Secretary of the Army (SA), reconsideration of his earlier request for: * removal of or placement in the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 2 September 2004, and allied documents * removal of or placement in the restricted section of his OMPF the annual Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the period 1 July 2002 through 30 June 2003 (hereafter referred to as the first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007466

    Original file (20080007466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007466 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) be adjusted from 9 February 2006 to 24 July 2001. The opinion stated that the applicant had 4 years, 2 months, and 26 days of service as a WO1 when he was appointed in the KYARNG on 20 October 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016161

    Original file (20130016161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 18 January 2011, she was assigned as the S-4, HSC, 1204th Aviation Support Battalion, in an AOC 90A position. All CPT through COL positions will be transferred to AOC 90A with QM Branch 92 as the MOSC secondary position. The applicant has served 4 years and 11 months in AOC 92A positions, AOC 90A positions, or in positions she was assigned to for the convenience of the government.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065542C070421

    Original file (2001065542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion to major but that the computer at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) does not show that he has completed the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, so he has not been considered for promotion. On 8 January 1986, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) responded to a request from the applicant, case number AC 85-00251, to correct his commissioning as a USAR officer from 23 August 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009381

    Original file (20080009381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Special Orders Number 113 AR, dated 26 July 2000, show the applicant was granted Federal Recognition for appointment to Warrant Officer One effective 19 May 2000 in MOS 001A. Evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed a Warrant Officer One in the Army National Guard on 19 May 2000. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012394

    Original file (20100012394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also submits a letter dated 29 January 2010 from the KYARNG Director of Administrative Service who states he conducted a review of the applicant's records and following discussions with the SJA and Personnel Directorate (J1), along with the state attorney and former SJA, he believes the applicant was summarily discharged from the KYARNG without appropriate due process. The applicant had 18 years of qualifying service for retired pay purposes at the time of his discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014788

    Original file (20140014788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. email correspondence; b. NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E-DSIPP (Annex R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 – Reenlistment/Extension Decentralized State Incentive Pilot Program (DSIPP) Addendum ARNG of the United States); c. Certificate of Completion for the 31B Basic Military Police Course; d. Diploma issued to him upon graduation from the 31B Military Police ALC; e. a memorandum showing the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denial of his request for an ETP; and f. a memorandum rendered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017598

    Original file (20060017598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By Headquarters, First United States Army memorandum, dated 12 June 1987, the applicant was notified that he was promoted to the rank of MAJ effective 1 October 1985, with time in grade computed from 13 April 1983 (apparently not realizing the applicant had declined promotion in 1983). On 15 May 1992, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM-STL, advised the applicant that Headquarters, First United States Army originally gave him his original date of rank of 13 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003627

    Original file (20130003627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the rater was not qualified * he was assigned and rated in a principle duty position that was contrary to the provisions of Army Regulation 614-100 (Officer Assignment Policies, Details, and Transfers) * the OER was not conducive to either Army Regulation 614-100, nor Army Regulation 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System) in utilizing a warrant officer outside their military occupational specialty (MOS) * the OER was submitted without the documentation required by Army...