| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge by reason of physical disability.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he believes that he should have received an honorable discharge for physical disability because he is having medical problems he believes is related to his service. In support of his application he submits three character references from third party sources.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on 23 April 1965, for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman. He was transferred to Fort Gordon, Georgia, to undergo his training.
On 21 August 1965, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for assaulting another soldier. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
He completed his advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman and received orders transferring him to Europe. His orders directed him to report to Fort Dix, New Jersey on 27 September 1965. On 10 October 1965, NJP was imposed against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 27 September to 10 October 1965.
The applicant received a change of orders and was transferred to Vietnam on 18 December 1965, where he was assigned as a draftsman to Headquarters, Special Troops, United States Army, Vietnam (USARV) in Saigon.
In January 1966, he was admitted to the 3rd Field Hospital in Saigon following a seizure that he experienced after ingesting a fifth of whisky.
On 13 April 1966, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 20 January to 23 February 1966, and of wrongfully possessing two ration cards. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for a period of 6 months and a forfeiture of pay.
In April 1966, while in the stockade, he was diagnosed as having psychomotor epilepsy since the age of 2½ years. The examining physician directed that he be evacuated to the United States as a prisoner. Accordingly, he was evacuated to Valley Forge General Hospital at Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, where he remained until he was reassigned to Fort Dix on 6 July 1966.
On 8 September 1966, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 21 July to 18 August 1966. He was sentenced to be reduced to the pay grade of E-3, a forfeiture of pay and restriction.
On 20 October 1966, he underwent a neuropsychiatric examination which opined that that the applicant was mentally responsible, able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right. He further opined that the applicant had an "I don't care attitude" and that rehabilitation would be futile.
On 9 November 1968, the applicant's commander initiated a recommendation to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness, due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil/military/authorities. He cited the applicant's disciplinary record as the basis for his recommendation and recommended that he be given an undesirable discharge.
On 25 November 1966, after consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his rights and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved the recommendation for discharge on 30 November 1966 and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 8 December 1966, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness, due to frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil/military authorities. He had served 1 year, 2 months and 19 days of total active service and had 150 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 7 March 1981, for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable. The ADRB determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable and unanimously voted to deny his request on 10 July 1984.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities were subject to separation for unfitness. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.
3. The applicant's contentions and supporting documents have been considered by the Board; however, they are not sufficiently mitigating when compared to his overall undistinguished record of service.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fcj ____ ___ls ___ ___le ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002081986 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/05/29 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1966/12/08 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | UNFIT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 583 | 144.5000/A50.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087439C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 2 August 1966, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be discharged from the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness due frequent incidents of discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. Accordingly, the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090241C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. This program, known as the DOD Discharge Review Program (Special) (SDRP) required, in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary, that a discharge upgrade to either honorable or general be issued in the case of any individual who had either completed a normal tour of duty in Southeast Asia, been wounded in action, been awarded a military decoration other than a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005908C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, the regulation provides that an honorable or general discharge certificate may be awarded if the individual has been awarded a personal decoration or if warranted by the particular circumstances in a given case. The regulation under which the applicant was discharged provides for the issuance of a discharge under honorable conditions when the individual has been awarded a personal decoration.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100831C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was punished in October 1967 for failing to report to duty, resulting in his reduction to pay grade E-1, and in November 1967 for failing to report to duty and for wearing the insignia of a sergeant (E-5) on his uniform. The applicant's combat decorations are noted, however, evidence available to the Board indicates that the applicant's incidents of misconduct were not limited to his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010079
There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its15-year statute of limitations. The applicant's record of service shows he was convicted by one summary court-martial and two special courts-martial for being AWOL on five separate occasions and he received NJP four times under Article 15, UCMJ. While the applicant's awards of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for service in the Republic of Vietnam are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003451
On 3 February 1967, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness due to frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. There is no indication in the available records that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for a discharge upgrade within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003486
On 5 February 1967, the applicant was convicted pursuant to his pleas by a special court-martial of AWOL from 1 January to 30 January 1967 and 1 February to 2 February 1967. On 10 February 1968, the appropriate authority (a lieutenant general) approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that the applicant be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence in the available records to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001067045C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 26 January 1968, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness and directed that the applicant be furnished an undesirable discharge. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included two nonjudicial punishments, two summary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070003716C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge under the Presidential Proclamation. There is also no evidence in the available record that show that he ever completed alternate service; that he was ever granted a presidential pardon; or that he was ever awarded a clemency discharge in accordance with the Presidential Proclamation. 360 |144.0000/ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE | |2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019027
On 4 December 1967, his commander informed him he was recommending him for discharge for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability) by reason of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military authorities. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the...