| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones, II | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to fully honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: He needs his discharge upgraded to qualify for a Department of Veterans Affairs Home Loan. He explains that at the time of his discharge, he was mentally unable to deal with the strict routine of the Army. He has since matured a great deal, is now married and is the father of six children.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
That on 28 April 1972, the applicant entered the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and was awarded the military occupational specialty of tank turret repairer. At the time of his entry, the applicant was 17 years old, had completed the 9th grade, and scored 38 on the Armed Forces Qualification Test (indicating a person of average learning ability). He successfully completed both basic and advanced individual training.
On 22 November 1972, the applicant accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for sleeping on guard duty. His punishment consisted of correctional custody for a period of 15 days.
On 6 February 1973, the applicant accepted NJP for disobeying an order to get out of bed and to clean his room. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $60.00 and extra duty for seven days.
On 22 February 1973, the applicant accepted NJP for disobeying an order to turn down his stereo. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $60.00, reduction to pay grade E-1, and extra duty and restriction for seven days.
On 6 March 1973, the applicant accepted NJP for dereliction in the performance of his duties by absenting himself from his guard post for 30 minutes. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $60.00.
On 8 June 1973, the applicant accepted NJP for leaving kitchen police duties without permission. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $71.00 and restriction and extra duty for 14 days.
The applicant’s complete discharge packet is not contained in his records. However, the available documents indicate that on 18 July 1973, the applicant’s commander notified a holding detachment commander that the applicant was pending discharge for unfitness. The basis for the action was the applicant’s five incidents of misconduct which resulted in NJP.
The applicant was discharged on 4 September 1973 under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200, for unfitness and was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He had a total of 1 year, 4 months and 7 days of active military service.
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13 established the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for unfitness that included frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. It provided that action would be taken to separate a member for unfitness when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally considered appropriate when a discharge for unfitness was approved.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Following the rules and regulations of the military is difficult for many people. When transitioning from being a citizen in a free society to a member of an orders and discipline based organization, such difficulty can be expected. That is one of the reasons why the Army has basic combat training. This period is designed to help a new soldier make that transition.
2. The fact that the applicant was not able to make the transition, when so many others do, does not form the basis for upgrading a properly issued discharge.
3. Five NJP’s are more than sufficient basis for discharging a soldier for unfitness and issuing him an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
4. While the fact that the applicant has matured, married and is raising a family is commendable, it is not the type of post-service conduct which would constitute grounds for upgraded his discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___fck ___ ___lls___ ____le____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002081978 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030529 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075234C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 18 December 1974, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. On 18 December 1974, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007915
The applicant states that at the time of his discharge from the Army he was an addict. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant had an addiction problem during his period of military service and/or sought counseling to correct this problem. The applicant's record of service includes five NJP's.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087830C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 April 1966, the applicant accepted NJP for being absent from his unit on 23 March 1966. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010930
The Court found him guilty and sentenced him to a reduction to PV1/E-1 and a forfeiture of $25.00 pay. The applicant's records show he submitted a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 17 February 1981 and he was accordingly scheduled for a hearing. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013394
On 11 December 1973, the applicants commander initiated a recommendation to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-5(a)1, for unfitness. On 20 June 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. The applicant's contention that he did not receive counseling or rehabilitation because of racial prejudices is not supported by the available evidence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005748C070205
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 2 March 1970, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for being AWOL during the period 31 January 1970 to 26 February 1970. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005955
On 14 September 1973, the convening/separation authority approved the board of officers findings and recommendations and directed the applicant be discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-5a of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of unfitness and that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his enlistment and between 19 and 20 years of age at the time of his various offenses. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013680 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions. There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089235C070403
On 27 July 1971, the unit commander recommended that the applicant appear before a board of officers to determine whether he should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 prior to his expiration term of service date. On 13 August 1971, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 with an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence of record that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075160C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.