| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Lana E. McGlynn | Member | ||
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her Pay Entry Basic Date (PEBD) be changed to 5 October 1984.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that her PEBD is incorrectly reflected as 23 October 1986 and should be reflected as 5 October 1984. She further states that she does not have copies of all of her enlistment/reenlistment contracts but submits copies of her leave and earnings statements (LES) to document her service.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records, though somewhat incomplete, show:
Her records do not contain her initial enlistment contract; however, they show that she initially enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 October 1984 and she served in a troop program unit (TPU) until 4 February 1990, when she was discharged from the USAR to join the United States Naval Reserve (USNR) on 5 February 1990. She served in the USNR until 13 March 1990, when she was discharged for fraudulent entry.
She had a break in service of 1 year, 6 months and 16 days before she again enlisted in the USAR on 30 September 1991. She has continued her service since that date.
In the processing of this case, officials at the Total Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) prepared a statement of service (DA Form 1506) computing the applicant's PEBD. Officials at the ARPERSCOM indicate that the applicant's PEBD, based on the available records, has been adjusted to 20 April 1986. The DA Form 1506 was provided to the applicant for review by officials at the ARPERSCOM and the applicant concurred with the computation on 13 March 2003. The advisory opinion was also provided to the applicant for comment and to date she has failed to respond.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's contention that her PEBD should reflect an October 1984 date is without merit. By virtue of her break in service of just over 18 months, when added to her initial entry date, her PEBD is clearly in 1986.
3. Although the Board cannot determine exact dates without all of her contracts, she was provided a statement of service from the PERSCOM and concurred with the computations made by that agency. Inasmuch as she has not disputed those computations, it is reasonable to presume, absence evidence to the contrary, that her PEBD of 20 April 1986, as changed by the ARPERSCOM, is correct.
4. In the event that the applicant can produce documents which show otherwise, she can provide those documents to officials at the ARPERSCOM to compute the necessary changes before applying to the Board for further changes.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__js ____ __wdp___ ___lem__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002081877 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/06/19 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 231 | 112.0900/PEBD |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103324C070208
Ronald J. Weaver | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant’s service as an ROTC cadet was not performed while he was in a concurrent drilling status in the USAR. Therefore, this service is not creditable service for PEBD purposes and there is insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085964C070212
The applicant states that in the early years of the SMP, the DA Form 4824-R was not required to be forwarded to the member's Military Personnel Records Jacket. Therefore, it appears the applicant meets the eligibility requirements to have her membership time in the SMP from 3 January 1980 through 29 July 1981 credited towards her PEBD. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the DA Form 4824-R prepared for the applicant on 4 January...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106058C070208
The second statement of service shows that she was a member of the SMP from 4 January 1983 to 14 December 1984. The copies of leave and earning statements submitted with her request show that she received pay in pay grade E-5 from January 1983 through December 1983. It is evident that the applicant was a member of the SMP in 1983 and 1984; however, there is insufficient evidence to grant her request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086390C070212
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, he requests his DEP time be cancelled and that his record show no break in service during this period. He states that he believes his PEBD should have been computed correctly upon his entrance on active duty with the Regular Army (RA). He stated that his initial record showed that his PEBD was wrong and it should have been computed correctly upon his entrance on active duty in November 1985.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072558C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) which states that the applicant is not entitled to constructive service credit for longevity pay purposes as a matter of law and regulation. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060226C070421
In an earlier advisory it was noted that the applicant’s records did not contain a DA Form 4824-R (SMP Contract) or orders that discharged him from ROTC to enroll in the SMP. It was determined that the applicant’s PEBD and Basic Active Service Date is 9 May 1986 and that his DIEMS date is 3 July 1984. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015772C071029
The applicant provides his waiver of indebtedness packet; four leave and earnings statements (LESs); a USARC (U. S. Army Reserve Command) Form 22-R (Adjustment Certification Worksheet); a USAR Personnel/Pay Mismatch Report; a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 September 1984; discharge orders, dated 29 April 1986; an enlistment contract, dated 7 May 1987; a DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment); discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010156C080407
The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request that his record be corrected to show he was authorized the special rate of basic pay for pay grade 0-3E based on his previous enlisted service; and re- computation of his creditable service for the purpose of computing basic pay for longevity purposes 2. During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board concluded that the applicant had not completed sufficient active duty enlisted service to qualify for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022122
(2) paragraph 2-2 (Establishing creditable service - officers) that Active Army officers entering active duty and Reserve Component (RC) officers ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 179 days must submit a DA Form 1506 to the servicing Finance Officer/Defense Military Pay Office (FO/DMPO). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision set forth in ABCMR Docket Number AR20090018620, dated 1 July 2010, by directing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013312
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). The applicant states, in effect, that she was prior service and when she came back on active duty her basic active service date (BASD) was adjusted to 29 December 1985 to reflect her prior active service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicants PEBD was adjusted to 25 June 1979 after her retirement on 30 April 2006.