| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Member | ||
| Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show his rank as staff sergeant (SSG).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that on the date of his separation from the Army he held the rank of SSG.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant’s military records were lost or destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55).
The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 confirms that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 March 1943, and that he continuously served on active duty until being honorably separated on 25 October 1945. Item 3 (Grade) of this document contains the entry private first class (PFC), indicating that he held the rank of PFC on the date of his separation. Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) contains the entry PFC, which indicates that the highest rank he attained, held, and served in while on active duty was PFC. Item 56 (Signature of Person Being Separated) contains the applicant’s signature, which verifies that he authenticated the separation document and the information contained therein on the date of his separation.
Army Technical Manual 12-235 prescribed the policy and procedure for preparing separation certificates and documents for enlisted personnel discharged, relieved from active duty, or transferred to a Reserve component. Section VI, paragraph 24, stated that the grade held at the time of separation would be entered on the separation certificate and associated documents. In addition, the regulation provided for entering the highest grade attained, held, and served in on active duty in Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) of the WD AGO 53-55.
Army Regulation 15-185, provides the regulation that governs the operation of the Board, sets forth the procedures for processing requests to correct military records states, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity and the burden of proving error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence rests with the applicant.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the contention of the applicant that his rank at the time of his separation is incorrect and should be corrected to read the rank of SSG. However, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. The available evidence includes a properly constituted WD AGO Form 53-55, which was authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his release from active duty. Item 3 of this document confirms that the applicant held the rank of PFC on the date of his separation, and Item 38 verifies that PFC was the highest rank he attained, held, and served in while on active duty.
3. Lacking official evidence to show that the applicant was ever actually promoted to the rank of SSG during his active duty tenure, the Board must presume government regularity in the preparation of the separation document and the information contained therein. Therefore, it is compelled to deny the requested relief in the interest of fairness to all those who served during World War II who faced similar circumstances.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___JHL__ __RVO__ __ECP__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002081236 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/03/27 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.0900 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066721C070402
The applicant states, in effect, that the highest rank the FSM held during his active duty tenure was SGT. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the highest grade the FSM held on active duty was SGT and it carefully considered the documents submitted by the applicant to support her claim. During the processing of this case, the Board did find that the FSM was awarded the BSM based on having earned the CIB during World War II.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000906
The applicant provides a self-authored statement, WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record), WD AGO Form 53-55, discharge certificate, and photocopies of a dog tag and ribbons/patches in support of his application. Although the applicant did not request this awards correction, given the correction to his WD AGO Form 53-55 is based on the error in his unit designation, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the BSM and to add these awards to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014316
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. However, although the sincerity of the applicant's contention that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021372
The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her father's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 22 March 1947 to show his middle name and to show his rank as staff sergeant (S/SGT) instead of private first class (PFC). The available evidence shows that at the time of the FSM's discharge on 28 October 1945, his rank was PFC, which is reflected on his WD AGO Form 53-55 covering...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007846C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was promoted to the highest rank authorized for his military occupational specialty (MOS). However, the Board elected to review the case using the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55, WD AGO Form 100 and various documents provided in the reconstructed record provided by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). In Item 3 (Grade) of this document, it shows the applicant held the rank of PFC on the date of his separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091243C070212
The applicant is requesting correction of a rank error on his separation document that he should have discovered on the date of his separation, 21 November 1945. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence shows that the applicant authenticated his WD AGO Form 53-55 with his signature on 21 November 1945, the date of his separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022558
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of item 3 (Grade) of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to reinstate his previous rank of staff sergeant (SSG). The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089939C070403
In response to a July 2002 application to the Board, a member of the Board staff administratively closed the applicant’s case without referral to the Board (AR2002076716) based on the lack of records and available documentation that would allow a fair and impartial review of the case. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55), his Honorable Discharge Certificate, and Special Order 125. In order to support the award of the PH, the awards...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060990C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the rank and pay grade of technical sergeant (TSGT) and that he be recognized for wounds received in action during combat operations. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the rank and pay grade of technical sergeant (TSGT) and that he be recognized for wounds received in action during combat operations. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008334
The applicant requests, in effect, that her record and separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected to show a higher rank. The applicant's military records were not available for review, however, there is a properly constituted separation document on file that confirms she held the rank of PFC on the date of her separation, and that this was the highest rank she attained while serving on active duty. _________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...