| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Carolyn G. Wade | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the Board void her Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty (GRFD) Scholarship/DASE-COOP Cadet Contract Endorsement and that she be allowed to enter the Regular Army.
APPLICANT STATES: That she did not fully understand the type of scholarship she received and that she accepted it because she needed help with tuition and books.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 17 August 1994 and served until she was discharged on 29 August 1999 to enter an officer-training program. At the time of her discharge, she was serving in the rank of sergeant/E-5 as a medical noncommissioned officer. The applicant’s discharge from the RA was contingent upon concurrent enlistment in the United States Army Control Group (ROTC) for a period of 8 years
On 6 September 2000, by signing the GRFD Scholarship/DASE-COOP Cadet Contract Endorsement the applicant acknowledged that she understood that her service on active duty would not be required upon her completion of her degree requirements and successful completion of the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps training. She also acknowledged that she understood that after commissioning that her military service obligation could only be fulfilled in the Army National Guard.
On 2 August 2002, following completing of all training requirements, the applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant/0-1 in the United States Army Reserve and assigned to the Adjutant General’s Corps.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes that the applicant accepted an Army scholarship in order to accomplish her educational goals. Now that those goals have been accomplished she should be held to the conditions of her contract.
2. The Board notes that the conditions of the contract were clearly spelled out and that by signing the contract the applicant acknowledged that she understood the conditions of the contract and that she was not eligible to serve her military service obligation on active duty, but only in the National Guard.
3. The Board finds that the applicant is not eligible to serve her military service obligation on active duty and there is no reason to void her contract.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __mvt___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002081102 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030819 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 112.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002759C070208
The applicant provides an extract from Title 10, section 2107a; his DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract) and his DA Form 597-3A (Addendum to Army Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps Scholarship Cadet Contract); his ROTC Cadet Command Form 203-R (Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty (GRFD) Scholarship/DASE- COOP Cadet Contract Endorsement); an extract from Cadet Command Regulation 145-10; an ROTC Cadet Command Form 204-R (Revocation of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004852C070208
The Office of Personnel and Administration, U. S. Army Cadet Command provided a 6 August 2002 email from the University of Oregon PMS, who stated the applicant had indicated that her mind was made up and she wanted to request disenrollment from ROTC because she did not think it was possible to be guaranteed Reserve forces duty. The Office of Personnel and Administration, U. S. Army Cadet Command provided a 10 September 2002 email from the executive officer, Santa Clara University ROTC which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016376
g. The ETP denial further stated she was still under contract obligation for a ROTC scholarship when she signed the OAB agreement. The applicant became a MILTECH after serving al least 1 day of the contract term she signed an agreement for the OAB while on the SMP scholarship, and her OAB addendum was signed after the commissioned date, all of which were not authorized and violated the ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) 07-06, updated, 1 March 2009 to 15 June 2010. b. She did...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011795
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 23 July 2008 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 4 February 2009 * Orders Number 034-01, issued by the Northeastern Pennsylvania Army ROTC, University of Scranton on 4 February 2009 * Cadet Command (CC) Form 203-R (Guaranteed Reserve Forces Duty (GRFD)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007521
The applicant requests a bonus control number be assigned to the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus agreement he was offered upon his commissioning in order to receive a $10,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus (OAB). The applicant received an ROTC scholarship as a condition of commissioning into the ARNG. In order to be eligible for the Selected Reserve (SELRES) OAB as a commissioned officer in the ARNGUS an individual must meet the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059864C070421
The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 30 October 1998, under the ROTC Scholarship Cadet Program. It stated that the applicant was disenrolled from ROTC under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraph 3-43a(15). The applicant acknowledged that she understood and agreed that if she was disenrolled from the ROTC program during Military Science II, she could be called to active duty for a period of two years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013923
He states his Army National Guard (ARNG) enlistment contract clearly shows he is eligible to participate in the SLRP while contracting with the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC)/Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP). The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 13 April 2011 and he contracted for the SLRP as an enlistment incentive. However, on 8 November 2011, he contracted into the ROTC/SMP and his SMP contract specifically states, "Upon acceptance into SMP, I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015462
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the documentation related to her disenrollment and breach of contract while in the Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Program, as well as remission of her ROTC debt in the amount of $8,372.50 2. The applicant provides: a. When she signed the ROTC Scholarship contract, she agreed that in the event she disenrolled from the ROTC program, she could either be ordered to repay her scholarship debt or be required to enter active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064274C070421
Applicant: But did you say that to me? She alleged fraudulent and deceptive recruitment practices by the Army; the PMS duped her, a “trusting young 17 year old girl with no preconceived notions of the Army” when he first pursued her; the PMS misrepresented and manipulated the entry requirements as evidenced by her failure to meet the weight requirements or pass the physical test prior to her signing the contract; the PMS led her to believe that weight and physical conditioning were not a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007093
The applicants military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 19 May 2004. The evidence of record shows the applicants DD Form 214, with an effective date of 19 May 2004, documents that she was ordered to ADSW on 2 February 2004, was honorably REFRAD on 19 May 2004, and credited with completing 3 months and 18 days net active service this period (i.e., 108 days). Notwithstanding Headquarters, USA HRC, AHRC-PLSR2-0300, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders T-01-400925A05,...