| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Lana E. McGlynn | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the record of a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) be expunged from his records.
APPLICANT STATES: That he never received the NJP, he was not notified of his rights, there was never any hearing and he did not sign the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ). He contends that the NJP was not conducted properly, that there is a requirement that he be counseled and a record of counseling prepared and attached to the DA Form 2627. He argues that the DA Form 2627 does not set forth an offense, which makes it difficult to know how to respond. The applicant implies that the DA Form 2627, itself, is a forgery. He provides examples of his signature and initials and asks that they be compared to the signatures and initials on the form.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was a member of the Florida Army National Guard serving in pay grade E-4 with the 13th Army Band, on 26 April 1995, when the commanding officer notified him that NJP was being considered for falsifying an official document. The applicant waived his right to demand trial by court-martial and requested a closed hearing. He requested that another person speak in his behalf and indicated that matters in defense, mitigation or extenuation were both not presented and were attached.
The commander imposed punishment in the form of reduction to pay grade E-3. The applicant did not appeal.
Army Regulation 27-10 provides policy for the administration of military justice. Chapter 3 provides that nonjudicial punishment is appropriate in all cases involving minor offenses in which non-punitive measures are considered inadequate or inappropriate. It is a tool available to commanders to correct, educate and reform offenders whom the commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures. It preserves a member's record of service from unnecessary stigma by a record of court-martial conviction; and furthers military efficiency by disposing of minor offenses in a manner requiring fewer resources than trial by court-martial. The imposing commander is not bound by the formal rules of evidence before courts-martial and may consider any matter, including un-sworn statements the commander reasonably believed to be relevant to the case. Furthermore, whether to impose punishment and the nature of the punishment are the sole decisions of the imposing commander.
Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual Files, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. Paragraph 2-3 prescribes that the OMPF is to be maintained in a microcopy form. It consists of three parts: 1) the service fiche (s-fiche) which contains service data and general information; 2) the p-fiche which contains performance, commendatory, and disciplinary information; and 3) the r-fiche, which contains historical data or documents which, may normally be improper for review by selection boards or career managers. Letters or memoranda of reprimand filed in accordance with Army Regulation 600-37, are normally filed on the p-fiche. Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the OMPF, it becomes a permanent part of that file. That paragraph provides for appeals for transfer/removal of the LOR by this Board or by certain other Departmental agencies.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations it is concluded:
1. There is no available evidence to substantiate the applicant's contentions or to show that the DA Form 2627 is anything but an authentic document. The Board notes that the applicant does not proclaim his innocence in the offense charged or deny knowledge of the incident at issue.
2. This Board does not have a handwriting analysis expert on staff, accordingly no conclusion can be drawn from handwriting samples.
3. There is no evidence to show that the NJP was not imposed in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies. The punishment imposed was neither unjust nor disproportionate to the offense, and there is no evidence of any substantive violation of any of the applicant's rights.
4. The regulation that governs the maintenance of personnel records provides that once the custodian accepts a document it is presumed to be administratively correct. Demonstrating otherwise is the individual
's responsibility.
5. As its name indicates, nonjudicial punishment is different from a trial by court-martial. A nonjudicial punishment hearing is a more informal proceeding where the rules of evidence need not be strictly applied. Before he elected to accept nonjudicial punishment the applicant was made aware of these differences and of his right to demand court-martial where he would receive the protection of the rules of evidence. Instead he chose to have the matter settled at nonjudicial punishment.
6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS___ ___LEM_ __WDP_ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002081021 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030619 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | deny |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 126.01 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711237
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant requested a separation from the Army for hardship reasons in early 1993. As its name indicates, nonjudicial punishment is different from a trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014197
The imposing commander directed this Article 15 be filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF. The evidence of record further shows that this DA Form 2627 is properly filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF as directed by the imposing commander. The applicant is currently an SFC/E-7.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000559
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000559 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) be removed from the Performance Section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, the filing location for the NJP issued on 26...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070252C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the record (DA Form 2627) of a 9 December 1986 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice be expunged from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Effective in 1987 Army Regulation 27-10 was changed to provide for the filing of NJP in a unit punishment file and the military personnel record jacket (MPRJ) for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067433C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008325
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) be set aside and that the DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) dated 9 November 1971 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, lacking evidence to establish that the applicant did not commit the misconduct for which NJP was imposed or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082511C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078550C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The imposing commander...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008619
The applicant provides: * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * 15 letters of support/character reference * 2 DA Forms 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) * DA Form 2627-2 (Record of Supplementary Action Under Article 15, UCMJ) * 20 pages of an Administrative Separation Board Hearing CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. After hearing all matters presented in defense, mitigation, and/or extenuation and after having considered the violation(s) of the UCMJ,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017917
The officer conducting the counseling stated that the applicant was required to sign in to his unit on 29 December 2008 after being on temporary duty in conjunction with a period of authorized leave. The former battalion commander requested removal of the Article 15 from the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF. LTC P____ stated he would not have imposed NJP; however, the applicant's commander decided to proceed with NJP.