| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Deborah S. Jacobs | Member | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
2. The Disabled American Veterans (DAV), on behalf of the applicant, requests, in effect, reconsideration of the applicant's previous application to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart.
3. The DAV states, in effect, that the applicant was wounded in action in North Africa during World War II.
4. Records show that the applicant's original request for award of the Purple Heart (Docket Number AR88-00744) was considered and denied by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 25 January 1989. However, this Memorandum of Consideration is not contained in the available records; therefore, this case is being considered "de novo."
5. The available records show that the applicant enlisted on 6 January 1942. He served as a rifleman in the European Theater of Operations and was honorably discharged on 2 August 1943.
6. The applicant's Transcript from Enlisted Record does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. This record also shows the entry, "None" in the section, "Wounds Received in Action."
7. The DAV provided an undated copy of a newspaper article titled, "496 NAMES ADDED TO ARMY WOUNDED." This article shows the applicant was wounded in action in North Africa.
8. The newspaper article is new evidence and will be considered by the Board.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) sets forth the policy and procedures for the ABCMR. It provides that, if a request for reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence that was not in the record at the time of the Board’s prior consideration. This includes but is not limited to any facts or arguments as to why relief should be granted. The staff of the Board is authorized to determine whether or not such evidence has been submitted.
11. Army Regulation 15-185 provides further guidance for reconsideration requests that are received more than one year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case. In such cases, the staff of the Board will review the request to determine if substantial relevant evidence has been submitted that shows fraud, mistake in law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or if there exists substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s original decision. If the staff finds such evidence, the case will be resubmitted to the Board. If no such evidence is found, the application will be returned without action.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board finds the newspaper article sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action during World War II.
2. In view of the foregoing findings, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action during World War II.
BOARD VOTE:
MHM____ DSJ____ JAM____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Melvin H. Meyer_____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002080987 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | Yes |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030520 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012235
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during World War II. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence (the applicant's recounting of his service history) provided by the applicant indicates the FSM received shrapnel in his legs and left ankle.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000099
The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant submitted two articles from the local newspapers stating that her father's face and hands were badly burned from being trapped in a tank and she states he was treated at a hospital in Rome, Italy. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show the FSM is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079538C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS :Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart for injuries suffered while he was a prisoner of war. There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II. Further, this Board also determined, after review of all the evidence in this case, that there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081962C070215
Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show award of the Purple Heart. The Board reviewed the statements submitted by the applicant and found the statement from the F Battery Executive Officer provided evidence that the applicant was wounded on the morning of 30 April 1943 near hill 609. After careful review of all the evidence, the Board determined that the statement by the F Battery Executive Officer combined with the Record of Events for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010461
A review of hospital admission data in the SGO files did not reveal any records indicating the FSM received a shrapnel wound to his knee or that he was otherwise wounded as a result of enemy action. The newspaper clipping shows the FSM was entitled to wear the insignia for the Meritorious Service Unit Plaque (later renamed the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)) and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and five battle stars. The applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097057C070212
The evidence confirms that the former servicemember was killed as a result of hostile action and as such is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart. As such, in the interest of justice and equity, it would be appropriate to award the former servicemember the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 20 October 1941 to 8 November 1942. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079930C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It provides that, if a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096625C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Those documents merely indicate that the service member “died in the line of duty.” The documents do not indicate that the applicant’s death resulted from hostile action. The fact that the former service member’s death was determined to have occurred in the line of duty is not, in and of itself, a basis for award of the Purple Heart but merely a conclusion that the injury was not the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004039
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. _________XXX____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090052C070212
The applicant provides, in support of his application, an undated newspaper article which announces his status as a POW; a self-authored letter, dated 20 May 1995; two Department of the Army Memorandums, dated 12 September 1996 and 17 October 1996, respectively; a letter addressed to a retired Army Colonel, dated 8 December 2001; an undated newspaper clipping which announces his advancement to the grade of SGT; a notice of change of address (WD AGO 204) with an undecipherable date; an...