| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | ||
| Ms. Linda M. Barker | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That before he dies, he desires that his discharge be upgraded to honorable for his children.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted in Indianapolis, Indiana, on 20 May 1966, for a period of 3 years and assignment to Korea. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Korea for duty as a cannoneer. He completed his tour in Korea and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-4 on 23 May 1969, due to the expiration of his term of service.
The applicant again enlisted in Denver, Colorado, on 22 March 1971, for a period of 3 years. He was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky, where he reenlisted on 22 April 1971, for a period of 4 years and assignment to Vietnam.
He was transferred to Vietnam on 6 September 1971. He served in Vietnam until 17 April 1972, when he was transferred to Fort Carson.
The applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) on 21 August 1972 and remained absent until he was returned to military control on 28 August 1972. He again departed AWOL on 7 September 1972 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities on 7 January 1973. He again departed AWOL on 10 January and remained absent until he was apprehended by civil authorities in Denver on 12 April 1973. He was returned to military control at Fort Carson, where charges were preferred against him for his AWOL offenses.
On 19 April 1973, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also acknowledged that he understood that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge. He further elected to submit a statement in his own behalf whereas he asserted that he had a poor attitude towards the Army, that he had no use for the Army and that he knew he would receive an undesirable discharge and he would accept it.
The appropriate authority (a brigadier general) approved his request on 3 May 1973 and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 5 June 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 1 year, 6 months and 8 days of active service during his current enlistment for a total of 6 years, 5 months and 4 days of total active service and had 221 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a voluntary request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was at that time and is still normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the length of his absences during a short period of time.
4. The applicant’s contentions have been considered by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his overall record of service. While the applicant did serve a 7 month tour in Vietnam, his extensive absences as well as the lack of mitigating circumstances to explain his misconduct clearly warranted the discharge he received.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___rjw___ __bje ___ ___lb ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002080865 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/04/08 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1973/06/05 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012514
Accordingly, he was discharged with an undesirable discharge, characterized as under other than honorable conditions on 5 October 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Boards 15-year statute of limitations. When authorized, it is issued to a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056168C070420
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was so discharged on 21 September 1974 with a total of 8 years, 1 month, and 1 day service and 16 days lost time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016305
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 12 April 1973, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 for misconduct - conviction by civil authorities. He contended at that time that he felt that his discharge was unfair because he was punished for the same offense by civil and military authorities and had not violated any military regulations. The applicant's overall record of service has been considered.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086797C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded. While the applicant did serve seven months in Vietnam, that in itself is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007128
The applicant requests affirmation of his general discharge as upgraded by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB). The ADRB upgraded his discharge to a general discharge; however, the VA has denied him benefits because his discharge was not affirmed by a corrections board. On 29 March 1973 after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000855
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He also states it would be in the interest of justice to upgrade his discharge given his undiagnosed PTSD. On 19 April 1973, after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011937
After his over 3 years of honorable service and his combat record, he should have received help instead of the discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3-7b, also provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the evidence shows that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017107
The applicant indicated in his request for discharge that he understood that if his discharge request was approved, that he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an under other than honorable conditions discharge certificate. The applicant's military service records show that he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and acknowledged guilt of the charges against him. The applicant states in his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000220
On 3 August 1973, the FSM acknowledged in a statement of counseling that he had been advised by consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated separation action and its effects, the rights available to him, and the effect of a waiver of his rights. The FSM's military personnel records contain a DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge or Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 25 July 1979, that shows the FSM requested that his undesirable discharge be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021804
Following counseling, the applicant submitted a voluntary written request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). On 3 April 1973, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and issued a DD Form 258A. The applicant provides a copy of the DD Form 258A issued to him at the time of his separation which shows he was discharged from the U.S. Army on 3 April...