Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080594C070215
Original file (2002080594C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 8 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002080594

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Mr. Robert Duecaster Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed from "3" to "1", that his Separation Code be changed from "JFX" to "JCC", that his narrative reason for separation be changed to entry level separation and that his service be uncharacterized.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was unjustly discharged by reason of a character and behavior disorder, when in fact, he does not and did not have a character and behavior disorder. He further states that he desires to again enlist; however, none of the branches of the service will grant him a waiver to enlist.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He initially served in the Navy from 27 August 1981 until his honorable discharge on 24 August 1985.

He was a college graduate when he enlisted in the Regular Army at the age of 35, on 21 August 1998. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Fort Drum, New York, for duty as a patient administrative specialist.

While at Fort Drum, he submitted a request for discharge as a conscientious objector. In connection with his request, he was referred for a mental status evaluation. The examining official opined that there was no evidence of emotional instability revealed during the clinical interview; however, the applicant harbors strong beliefs and ideas that are not conducive to service in the Armed Forces. The applicant was psychiatrically cleared for any administrative action deemed appropriate by the chain of command.

His request was denied and he indicated that he would use any legal means possible to get out of the Army.

The applicant was referred for a psychiatric evaluation and was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, occupational problems and a personality disorder. The examining psychiatrist recommended that he be administratively discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, due to a personality disorder.

The applicant's commander initiated a recommendation to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, by reason of a personality disorder. After being advised of his rights and the impact of the discharge action, the applicant waived his rights and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

The appropriate authority approved the recommendation on 9 February 2000 and directed that he be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 17 February 2000, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, by reason of a personality disorder. He had served 1 year, 5 months and 27 days of active service during his current enlistment and was issued a RE Code of "3".

On 3 December 2001, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board to have his RE Code and characterization of service changed. He contended at that time that the mental status evaluation and an evaluation by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Macon, Georgia, clearly indicated that he did not have a personality disorder and that the time between the mental status evaluation and the psychiatric evaluation was not enough time to develop a personality disorder. He further indicated that he wanted his service uncharacterized so that he would not have to request a waiver to enlist. The ADRB determined that his discharge and the reasons therefore, were both proper and equitable and voted unanimously to deny his request on 13 February 2002.

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 provides the criteria for discharge because of a personality disorder. It states, in pertinent part, that a soldier may be separated for personality disorders that interfere with assignment to or performance of duty. The diagnosis of personality disorder must have been established by a physician trained in Psychiatry and psychiatric diagnosis. Separation because of personality disorder is authorized only if the diagnosis concludes that the disorder is so severe that the soldier’s ability to function effectively in the military environment is significantly impaired. That regulation also provides that service will be uncharacterized when the individual being separated is in an entry level status and has 180 days or less of active service at the time the discharge proceedings are initiated.

RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 16 of Army Regulation 635-200. A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted.

Army Regulation 601-210 governs eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing of persons into the Regular Army and Reserve Components. It provides, in pertinent part, that a waiver for enlistment is required of all persons enlisting who were separated for a personality disorder, entry level performance or conduct and persons who profess conscientious objections or religious convictions which preclude unrestricted assignments and who desire to enlist as noncombatants.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.

3. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5; by reason of a personality disorder and was properly issued an RE Code of "3" in accordance with the applicable regulations. He has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was issued the wrong RE Code at the time of his separation or that he was improperly separated.

4. The Board has noted the applicant's contentions and find them to be without merit. At the time separation proceedings were initiated, the applicant was afforded the opportunity to challenge the proceedings and to submit matters in his own behalf. He elected not to do so in order to receive a discharge. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he has failed to convince the Board that he was improperly diagnosed at the time as having a personality disorder.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___mdm_ ___sac __ ___rld___ DENY APPLICATION


                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002080594
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/05/08
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 4 100.0300/re code
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608782C070209

    Original file (9608782C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander cited the reason for separation as the applicant’s personality disorder and recommended a description of service as uncharacterized, based on the applicant being in an entry level status. Any individual who has served for less than l80 days at the time his or her commander initiated separation action, and is not being separated for serious misconduct, will be given an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 establishes that a soldier separated for a personality...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006899

    Original file (AR20130006899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 9 August 2011, the unit commander, notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 31 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining his military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067881C070402

    Original file (2002067881C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. They did identify a speech defect but he was granted a waiver. On 25 March 1986, the applicant was counseled on his remark “go to hell, drill sergeant.” He started to cry and stated, “I don’t know” when asked if he had any problems.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009833C070208

    Original file (20040009833C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    An 18 June 2002 counseling statement notes the applicant was counseled regarding the provisions of separation under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5 for the convenience for the government. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015671

    Original file (20060015671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from the Army in 1999 for personality disorder. The applicant provides letters, dated 31 October 2006 and 15 September 2006, from a Member of Congress; DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods ending 22 March 1999 and 11 May 1991; a psychiatric evaluation conducted on 5 January 2006; his discharge packet; service personnel records; and medical records dated 2006. The regulation also directs...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007509C070205

    Original file (20060007509C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his separation code and Reentry (RE) Code be changed to a code that will allow him to enlist in another service. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005730

    Original file (20130005730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the narrative reason for separation and the separation code be changed from "Personality Disorder" and "JFX" to medical discharge – post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the immediate commander initiated separation action against the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder. As confirmed by the OTSG advisory opinion, while it is possible he may have developed PTSD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016060

    Original file (AR20130016060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s record indicates that on 15 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, not a disability, specifically for having been diagnosed by competent medical authority with a psychiatric criteria for administrative separation in accordance with Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200. The applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006806C071029

    Original file (20070006806C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    David W. Tucker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Paragraph 5-13 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members with a personality disorder (not amounting to a disability) that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080671C070215

    Original file (2002080671C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was unjustly discharged for a personality disorder and that there is no evidence that he has a personality disorder. On 13 July 2001, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending him for separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, by reason of a personality disorder.