| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, when he learned that he was not physically qualified for combat duty he became disenchanted with the Army and concocted a means to get out. The applicant’s statement infers that he either lied about taking drugs or started taking drugs to be discharged.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant entered active duty on 30 July 1971. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training (AIT).
On 13 December 1971, while in AIT, the applicant was transferred to the hospital and placed in the medical holding company on 20 January 1972. The specific reason or circumstance leading to this hospitalization is not of record.
On 18 January 1972 the Mental Hygiene Consultation Service examined the applicant. During that examination the applicant gave a history of multiple drug abuse both prior to and during his period of service. He was diagnosed as having a character and behavior disorder manifested by chronic drug abuse and found not amiable to rehabilitation. He was found to be able to distinguish between right and wrong and psychiatrically cleared to participate in any administrative actions.
On 24 January 1972, the applicant’s command commenced administrative discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability.
On 25 January 1972, the applicant acknowledged and waived his rights to appear before and/or have his case reviewed by a board of officers, to submit a statement on his own behalf and/or to be represented by counsel. He acknowledged that he could expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received a general discharge and that if discharged with less than an honorable discharge it would be unlikely that he could get the character of his discharge changed at a later date.
The applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for leaving the ward without authority and for disrespectful language toward a senior noncommissioned officer, on 1 February 1972.
The applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) on 12 February 1972. He returned to military control on 5 September 1972.
Upon his return to military control, the applicant’s command resumed the administrative discharge actions.
The discharge authority reviewed the recommendation and directed that the applicant be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade and discharged with a general, under honorable conditions, discharge.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows that he was discharged on 21 September 1972, under honorable conditions. He is shown to have had 7 months and 3 days of creditable service with 206 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-212, then in effect, set forth the policy and procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness and unsuitability. It provided, in pertinent part, for the discharge due to unsuitability of those individuals with character and behavior disorders and disorders of intelligence as determined by medical authority. When separation for unsuitability was warranted an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's entire record.
Paragraph 6 of the regulation provided, in pertinent part, that an individual was subject to separation for unfitness because drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit-forming drugs or marijuana. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
The Manual for Courts-Martial, Table of Maximum Punishments shows that a punitive discharge is authorized for any AWOL of more than 30 days.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes that the applicant was already being processed for separation due to unsuitability when he went AWOL. His command could have filed court-martial charges or processed him for unfitness, which could have resulted in a punitive or undesirable discharge.
2. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. Considering all the circumstances of the case, but especially, that the applicant enlisted for 3 years but performed virtually no useful service, the character of the discharge is quite lenient.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
| CASE ID | AR2002080329 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030610 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | upgrade |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012346
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge, from an under honorable conditions (general) discharge to an honorable discharge. It now appears his overall service record and diagnosed character and behavior disorder (now known as personality disorder) warrant upgrading his discharge to fully honorable, as directed by the above-referenced Army memoranda. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001352
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Although the applicant contends that he had a good record until his last month of service, the evidence of record shows his first nonjudicial punishment was in April 1972 and he had three nonjudicial punishments in July 1972. Since the applicant's record of service included four nonjudicial punishments and 4 days of lost time, his record of service was not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067677C070402
On 7 November 1974 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. This program, known as the DOD Discharge Review Program (Special) (SDRP) required, in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary, that a discharge upgrade to either honorable or general be issued in the case of any individual who had either completed a normal tour of duty in Southeast Asia, been wounded in action, been awarded a military decoration other than a service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021602
On 25 July 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 and directed the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing him a new DD Form 214 showing his character of service as honorable and an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 25 August 1972, in lieu of the DD Form 214 and General Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022636
On 2 June 1972, the applicant's commander notified the applicant that he was being processed for elimination under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability). The U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency, under the operational control of the Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), is responsible for administering the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and executes Secretary of the Army decision-making...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014241
When separation for unsuitability was warranted an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's entire record. Paragraph 2-10 states, in pertinent part, to issue a DD Form 257A (General Discharge Certificate) appropriately to all Soldiers receiving a general discharge. While the applicants command determined that he should be issued a general discharge, based on his extensive record of indiscipline in less than 18 months,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059110C070421
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. It required retroactive application of revised policies, attitudes and changes in reviewing applications for upgrades of discharges based on personality disorders. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012386
He goes on to state that his records are missing an Army psychological evaluation done prior to his separation that documented his pre-existing depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in his childhood history and, therefore, constituted a pre-existing disability that was exacerbated by the trauma of his service in Berlin. He recommended administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability) due...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003138
On 22 September 1969, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 by reason of unfitness and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He was discharged for unsuitability due to this character and behavior disorder with an under conditions other than honorable discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004158
On 11 January 1972, the applicant's unit commander notified him that action was being initiated to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations Discharge Unfitness and Unsuitability) for unfitness because of his unauthorized possession of marijuana. On 22 May 1972, the applicant was discharged accordingly. On 11 September 1973, the Army Discharge Review Board, after careful consideration of his military records and all other available evidence,...