| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, he was on drugs and made mistakes that led to his discharge. He states that is now in a rehabilitation program and requests a personal appearance before the Board.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show that:
The applicant entered active duty on 24 June 1968. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training with award of the military occupational specialty (MOS) 67A (Aircraft Maintenance Crewman).
The applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 30 August 1968 for being absent without leave from 26 August 1968 through 28 August 1968.
On 8 November 1968, a special court-martial found him guilty of being AWOL from 15 September 1968 through 10 October 1968 and, on 17 February 1969, a summary court-martial found him guilty of being AWOL from 5 January 1969 through 6 February 1969.
He went AWOL a fourth time on 13 March 1969. Court-martial charges were preferred for AWOL from 13 March 1969 through 17 May 1969.
On 19 May 1969, after consulting with counsel and being advised of his rights and options, the applicant submitted a formal request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He acknowledged he had been advised of and understood his rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, (UCMJ) that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge which would deprive him of many or all of his benefits as a veteran, that he could expect to experience substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received an UOTHC discharge.
The discharge authority accepted his request and directed that he receive an undesirable discharge.
The applicant was discharged on 11 June 1969 under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he had 6 months and 16 days of creditable service with 163 days lost due to AWOL.
There is no evidence in the applicant’s record that he had any type of drug or family problems at the time of his discharge. Nor are there any medical records available that indicate that the applicant was treated for drug abuse while in the service.
On 9 April 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
The Manual for Courts-Martial, Table of Maximum Punishments, sets forth the maximum punishments for offenses chargeable under the UCMJ. A punitive discharge is authorized for offenses under Article 86, for periods of AWOL in excess of 30 days.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. His service is appropriately characterized by his overall record.
2. The applicant has provided no documentation of any drug problem. While the Board notes the candid admission of a drug problem and the reported current participation in a rehabilitation program, it finds that, in light of his very brief undistinguished service and the offenses that led to his discharge, these factors are insufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
3. Furthermore, the Board rejects the implication that illegal drug abuse necessarily mitigates both itself and the effects thereof.
4. There is no statutory or regulatory right to a personal appearance hearing. Formal hearings are granted only when it has been determined that a case is so complex, or the records so incomplete that only sworn testimony can provide the necessary information. A formal hearing is not warranted in this case.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
| CASE ID | AR2002080268 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030610 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | Upgrade |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062803C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 28 November 1969, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed an undesirable discharge. On 26 August 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078328C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 30 August 1965 and on 4 June 1966, he was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009518C070208
There is no indication the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a discharge upgrade with that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063085C070421
On 12 February 1969, he accepted NJP for being AWOL from 5 to 8 January 1969. While the FSM’s discharge proceedings are not contained in his records, it must be presumed that he requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial for his two plus years absence. The Board has carefully considered the FSM’s creditable service and the fact that he served in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072549C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He served in the Ohio Army National Guard for 3 years, 7 months and 24 days and was discharged as a supply sergeant because of an incompatible occupation. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088332C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. However, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on three occasions for being AWOL and he had charges pending against him for being AWOL a fourth time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051241C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 December 1969, the applicant completed a separation physical examination. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051452C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 2 months and reduction to the grade of PV1.On 22 December 1969, the applicant was convicted again by a special court-martial for being AWOL from 19 November 1969 to 24 November 1969. There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705757
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.The Board considered the following evidence: On 25 January 1972 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade to his discharge and found that the discharge process was proper in all respects. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002304C070206
Michael Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 21 May 1969, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an undesirable discharge. Evidence of record also shows the applicant indicated in his request that he understood that he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.