| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member | ||
| Mr. Bernard P. Ingold | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was ill before he was inducted and did not get medical attention soon enough, which resulted in his getting pneumonia. He goes on to state that he believes that his discharge was unjust because he believes his service was honorable.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were destroyed in the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, which destroyed millions of service records. However, information obtained from alternate sources show:
He was inducted in San Francisco, California, on 20 February 1953. It appears that he was initially transferred to Fort Ord, California, and then to the basic training group at the Southwestern Signal Corps Training Center at Camp San Luis Obispo, California.
On 7 July 1953, he was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with psychoneurotic disorders, phobia reactions, which existed prior to entry on active military service.
On 9 July 1953, the applicant appeared before a board of officers to determine whether he gave evidence of inaptness or unsuitability that rendered his retention in the service as undesirable.
The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214) which shows that the board of officers approved his separation from the service on 10 July 1953, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-369, for unsuitability, based on a demonstrated lack of adaptability for military service because of a character and behavior disorder.
On 14 July 1953, he was discharged under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-369, for unsuitability. He had served 4 months and 25 days of total active service.
There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 615-369, in effect at the time, provided guidance for the separation of enlisted personnel for unsuitability based on a demonstrated lack of adaptability for military service because of a character and behavior disorder. The individual could receive an honorable or general discharge when discharge was recommended.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's administrative separation on 14 July 1953 was accomplished in accordance with regulations then in effect, and that his service was properly characterized.
2. Inasmuch as the regulation in effect required either an honorable or general discharge, the Board must also presume that there was a basis for the applicant receiving a general discharge instead of a fully honorable discharge. Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no basis to change the discharge 50 years after the fact.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__js_____ __bpi ___ ___tl____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002079974 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/04/29 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1953/07/14 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR615-369 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | UNSUIT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 547 | 144.4000/A40.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003345
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he received an honorable discharge for medical reasons or a medical discharge, that he be credited with service from 14 January 1954 to 22 March 2012, that he be promoted to the rank of captain effective 11 March 2009, and that medical records be deleted from his records for the period of 28 August 1953 to 14 January 1954. The FSM appeared before a board of officers on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064514C070421
A board of officers convened on 5 April 1954 with the applicant representing himself and making no challenges to any of the board members when afforded the opportunity. The individual could receive an honorable or general discharge when discharge was recommended. The applicant’s contentions that he had to endure terrible treatment and humiliation are not supported by either the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003453C070205
Army Regulation 615-368, also stated, in pertinent part, that a board of officers would recommend that the individual be either discharged because of unfitness, unsuitability, or retained in the service. It is also noted that the applicant now states he began drinking at the age of 12 and that alcohol was a large part of his life; however, his record of service shows that he served honorably and without any alcohol related incidents during the period 14 April 1948 to 13 April 1951. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061045C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : The applicant submitted three applications. The Board noted the applicant’s request to show his narrative reason for separation on his General Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710335
On 27 April 1953, the commander recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-369 for unsuitability. Army Regulation 615-369 set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for inaptitude or unsuitability. All of the medical conditions diagnosed during the applicant’s several physical examinations existed prior to his entry in the military service and there is no evidence to show they were aggravated by his term in the service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608081C070209
On 12 December 1953, the commander notified the FSM that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-369, for unsuitability. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: 1. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the FSM's overall record of military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067680C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no indication in the available records that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710335C070209
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge be changed to a medical discharge. On 12 May 1953, the applicant appeared before a discharge board. All of the medical conditions diagnosed during the applicants several physical examinations existed prior to his entry in the military service and there is no evidence to show they were aggravated by his term in the service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508885BC070209
The elimination board found that the applicant was unfit for further service because of sexual perversion and continual misconduct, and recommended that he given an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368. In view of the foregoing conclusions, the applicants records should be corrected as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected: a. by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019821
However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under honorable conditions (a general discharge) on 6 May 1954 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-369 (Enlisted Men Discharge Unsuitability). There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. _________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...