| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | ||
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
3. The applicant’s military records show that on 19 November 1981, he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty for 3 years. He was trained and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police).
4. The applicant’s record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition, and it confirms that the highest rank he attained while on active duty was private first class /E-3.
5. On 30 June 1982, the applicant was medically evaluated to determine if enrollment in the Army Weight Control Program (AWCP) was appropriate. It was determined that the applicant exceeded Army weight standards and he was placed in the AWCP. During his participation in this program, he was formally counseled by his chain of command on twenty-three separate occasions for his failure to lose the amount of weight required for him to meet Army weight control standards. In addition, on 23 June 1983, he was administered a “pinch test”, which resulted in his being found to be overweight by 11 pounds. As a result, he was barred from reenlistment based on his lack of progress in the AWCP.
6. On 12 December 1983, the applicant’s unit commander notified him that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200, for unsatisfactorily performance. The reasons cited for the action were the applicant’s inability to develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further training and become a satisfactory soldier.
7. On 12 December 1983, the applicant consulted legal counsel, and after being advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, he elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 December 1983, the appropriate authority approved his separation and directed that he receive a GD. On
3 January 1984, the applicant was discharged accordingly. At the time of his discharge, he had completed a total of 3 years, 8 months, and 11 days of active military service.
8. There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statue of limitations.
9. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13 contained the policy and outlines the procedures for separating individuals for unsatisfactory performance. It provided, in pertinent part, that commanders could separate a member under this chapter when, in the commander’s judgment, the member would not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further training and/or become a satisfactory soldier. Members who failed to meet the Army weight control standards who were recommended for separation by their commanders were processed under these provisions of the regulation.
10. Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 1332.28, dated 11 August 1982, subject: Discharge Review Board Procedures and Standards, established uniform policies, procedures, and standards for the review of discharges. Section 4 set forth the objectives for discharge review and stated, in pertinent part, that a change in policy, made expressly retroactive to the type of discharge under consideration, requires a change in the discharge. In addition, it indicates that a change of discharge is appropriate when there is substantial doubt the same discharge would be received if the relevant current policy had been in effect at the time the discharge was considered, even though the discharge was determined to have been otherwise equitable and proper at the time of issuance.
11. Since the time of the applicant’s discharge, chapter 18 (Failure to Meet Body Fat Standards) was added to Army Regulation 625-200. Chapter 18 (Failure to Meet Body Standards), currently in effect, provides that soldiers who failed to meet the body fat standards set forth in Army Regulation 600-9 shall be separated under this provision when it is the sole basis for separation. The regulation also states that if no medical condition exists and if the individual fails to make satisfactorily progress in the AWCP after a period of six months, then imposition of a bar to reenlistment and initiation of a separation action are required. The regulation further stipulates that the service of soldiers separated under this chapter will be characterized as honorable.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors and his characterization of service was appropriate based on regulatory guidance in effect at the time. However, current regulatory guidance specifies that when the sole basis for a soldier’s separation is failure to meet the standards of the AWCP, his/her service will be characterized as honorable.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the sole reason for the applicant’s discharge was his failure to meet AWCP standards. At the time of his discharge, he was properly issued a GD. However, under current regulatory standards, the reason for the applicant’s discharge would not warrant a GD. If he were discharged for the same reason under current standards, he would receive an HD.
3. In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds that the GD received by the applicant is inequitable under current regulatory standards. Therefore, it concludes that it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record by upgrading his discharge to an HD.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by upgrading the 3 January 1984 general discharge of the individual concerned to honorable; and by issuing him a corrected separation document that reflects this change.
BOARD VOTE:
__JLP__ __ AAO _ __ MKP __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_ Jennifer L. Prater _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002079815 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/03/18 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD, |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19840103 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200 . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Unsatisfactory Performance |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.6906 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006468
The commander advised him of his right to: * be represented by counsel * submit statements in his own behalf * review documents to be presented to the separation authority * waive any of these rights * withdraw any waiver of rights at any time prior to the date the discharge authority directs or approves his discharge 11. On 23 December 1983, he was released from active duty by reason of failure to meet body fat standards under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200. Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017368
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the narrative reason for his separation from honorably discharged due to failure to meet body fat standards to a medical discharge. On 4 April 1988, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 5-15 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for failing to meet body fat standards and enrollment in the AWCP and failing to make satisfactory...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003999
On 23 July 1990, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of failure to meet the Army weight/body fat standards of Army Regulation 600-9. Paragraph 5-15, in effect at the time, provided the policy for separating members who failed to meet the Army body composition/weight control standards if this condition was the only reason for separation and there...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024780
On 11 March 1991, after having determined the applicant failed to achieve the established goals or comply with weight standards, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of failure to meet the Army weight/body fat standards of Army Regulation 600-9. The evidence of record shows the applicant underwent a unit weigh-in and he exceeded both the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019186
On 19 January 2010, the applicants immediate commander initiated separation action against the applicant in accordance with chapter 18 of Army Regulation 635-200 for failing to meet body fat standards, enrollment in the AWCP on 10 August 2009, and failing to make satisfactory progress. A body fat evaluation may also be done by unit personnel to assist in measuring progress. If health care personnel are unable to determine a medical reason for lack of weight lossand if the individual is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020630
The applicant states: * his discharge under chapter 18 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation) due to overweight was improper * he was unjustly discharged from the Army for failing to meet the body fat standards of Regulation 600-9 (Army Weight Control Program (AWCP)) * his chain of command failed to follow the provisions of the regulation prior to separating him * he should have been medically evaluated to determine if he should have been medically separated due to an injury he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022241
The applicant states that he was enrolled in the Army Weight Control Program (AWCP) and met his weight standard on 4 August 2005 in accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-9 (AWCP). The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 5500-R (Body Fat Content Worksheet - Male), DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). AR 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014214
It states that the SPD code LCR is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 18, by reason of weight control failure. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 18, based on weight...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010760
He further states the recoupment of his educational assistance costs, as well as his separation, is unjustified for the following reasons: * the failed tape measurement standard was conducted on 21 September 2012 by a student and subject to error and a breach of his privacy * he passed a subsequent tape measurement standard on 31 October 2012 * his name was misspelled, his height was .5 inches shorter, and the calculations were wrong in the October 2012 tape measurement * he believes if one...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006204
On 5 December 2012, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him for failing to meet body fat standards or make satisfactory progress, in accordance with chapter 18 of AR 635-200 (Enlisted Administrative Separations). On 5 December 2012, the applicants immediate commander initiated separation action against the applicant in accordance with AR 635-200, chapter 18, for weight control failure. A designation of "unfit for...