Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079544C070215
Original file (2002079544C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 01 JULY 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002079544


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Ted S. Kanamine Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his date of rank as a first lieutenant as 21 November 1999 instead of 26 June 2001.

3. The applicant states that the delay in his promotion to first lieutenant was because he did not have the required security clearance. Requests for clearances were submitted in 1997, 1998, and 2000. In response to a request from this agency for more information, the applicant states that his first request for a clearance was submitted in September 1997 with his commissioning packet, and was returned to him in May 1998 because of an outdated fingerprint card. He resubmitted the packet to the S2 of his unit, the 455th Field Hospital. That unit was deactivated a year later, implying that his request was somehow lost. He states that he has no record of his conversations with the Inspector General's office, because all communications were conducted telephonically. He has not been able to provide documentation as requested. He did submit a request to a Member of Congress (MC) for assistance.

4. In a 1 December 2001 memorandum of support, the applicant's commanding officer stated that the applicant was commissioned in October 1997 following 13 years of enlisted service, and was then assigned to the 455th Field Hospital, which was inactivated in May 1999. He corroborates the applicant's statements. He states that the applicant was transferred to the 309th Combat Support Hospital, inquired about his clearance application, and was told that the delay was to be expected. In May the 309th informed him that they could not submit promotion documents because of the lack of security clearance. A new security clearance application was submitted in June 2000. In October 2000 the applicant requested an IG investigation and was told that there was a backlog [of clearance requests]. In December 2000 he was transferred to his present unit. In June 2001, his clearance was granted and he was promoted with a date of rank of 26 June 2001. The applicant's promotion was delayed because of problems in obtaining a security clearance, not due to any fault of the applicant.
5. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army Reserve delayed entry program for 6 years, on 13 February 1984. He was discharged from that program upon his enlistment in the Regular Army for 3 years on 2 August 1984. He was released from active duty on 1 June 1987. He was discharged from the Army Reserve on 1 August 1990. On 14 December 1994, he enlisted in the Army Reserve for 3 years. He continued his affiliation with the Army Reserve as an enlisted soldier until his commissioning as an Army nurse. He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army Reserve on 21 November 1997 with 7 months and 21 days of entry grade credit, and assigned to the 455th Field Hospital, a Reserve unit in Providence, Rhode Island. He completed the AMEDD Officer Basic Course on 15 January 1999. In April 1999 he was assigned to the 309th Combat Support Hospital and in December 2000, to the 402nd Medical Detachment, both units located at Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts.
6. In a 24 August 2001 letter, The Adjutant General informed a MC that the applicant had been granted a Secret clearance on 13 August 2001. A 12 October 2001 memorandum of record prepared by the Chief, Military Personnel Actions Branch at the Army Reserve Command indicates that the applicant could not be promoted on his promotion eligibility date of 31 March 1999 because all promotion qualifications were not met. He was promoted effective on 26 June 2001 in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 4-7.

7. The promotion eligibility date of 31 March 1999 cited above is based on the applicant receiving 7 months and 21 days of entry level credit upon his commissioning on 21 November 1997.

8. Army Regulation 135-100 prescribes policy and procedures for the appointment of commissioned officers in the Army Reserve, and states in pertinent part that applicants for appointment will have as a minimum, a Secret security clearance prior to being tendered an appointment. As an exception, health professionals, chaplains, and attorneys may be commissioned in the Reserve Components prior to completion of a National Agency Check (NAC)
provided that a NAC is initiated at the time an application for a commission is submitted; and the applying health professional, etc., agrees in writing that, if the results of the investigation are unfavorable, he or she will be subject to discharge if found to be ineligible to hold a commission.

9. Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy and procedures for the promotion of commissioned officers of the Army Reserve, and states in pertinent part, that an officer who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade must have undergone a favorable security screening. Promotion authorities will screen the military personnel records jacket to ensure that derogatory or unfavorable suitability information is not contained therein. If the screening reveals derogatory or unfavorable security information, the promotion authority will cause a National Agency Check (NAC) to be conducted. Final action of the promotion will be withheld until the results of the NAC are received.

10. Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 4-7, states, "An officer disqualified for promotion to 1LT or W-1 who was retained in an active status may be promoted if later determined qualified. The promotion eligibility date will not be earlier than the date the officer is determined qualified for promotion. A memorandum of record will be prepared to explain the later promotion eligibility date."

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant's contention is accepted. Apparent is the fact that a NAC had to be submitted at the time the applicant applied for a commission in 1997. Three and one half years later his clearance was granted and he was finally promoted to first lieutenant. It appears to the Board, notwithstanding the applicant's own responsibility in completing and submitting his clearance request, that personnel in his chain of command also had a responsibility to ensure that his clearance was timely processed. In this respect, he was not adequately served. This is an inordinate amount of time to process a clearance request, especially when such an action has an effect on the applicant's career. To let the matter rest as is, would be unfair and unjust – the applicant would be more than two years behind his contemporaries.

2. Further, it would appear to this Board that if the applicant was granted a clearance in 2001, then he would also have been eligible and would have been granted a clearance prior to his promotion eligibility date of 31 March 1999, had his clearance request been properly processed. He should have been promoted on his promotion eligibility date.

3. Consequently, the applicant's records should be corrected to show that he was promoted to first lieutenant on 31 March 1999, his promotion eligibility date. He should receive all due pay and allowances as a first lieutenant, pay grade 0-2, from that date.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to first lieutenant effective and with a date of rank of 31 March 1999, and that he receive all pay and allowances as a first lieutenant from that date.

BOARD VOTE:

__TSK __ __MHM__ __KYF__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Ted S. Kanamine_____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002079544
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030701
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102.07
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088051C070403

    Original file (2003088051C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The current regulation requires that an officer take and pass the APFT prior to being promoted; however, the regulation in effect at the time the applicant was eligible for promotion is silent in this regard. Over three years later his clearance was granted and he was finally promoted to first lieutenant. Further, it would appear to this Board that if the applicant was granted a clearance in 2000, then he would also have been eligible and would have been granted a clearance prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04103619C070208

    Original file (04103619C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The opinion noted that had the applicant met all of the military promotion qualification, his effective date for promotion to first lieutenant would have been 8 October 1999. Unfortunately, the documents available to the Board, and provided by the applicant, do not show any error or injustice in the delay of his promotion to first lieutenant because of his security clearance. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005929C070205

    Original file (20060005929C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion, dated 13 June 2006, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command (HRC) – St. Louis, Missouri, stated that an officer assigned to a unit must be fully qualified to be promoted and his date of rank is established as the date he met all requirements. He was selected for promotion to captain by the 2000 AMEDD RCSB; however, he could not be promoted because all promotion qualifications were not met, i.e.,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000901C070205

    Original file (20060000901C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a memorandum for record, dated 6 October 2005; an excerpt from Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers); a coversheet from the United States Army Reserve (USAR), dated 28 August 2001; a USAR Personnel Command promotion notification letter, dated 18 April 2003; six pages from the Total Army Personnel Database (TAPDB) Transaction History; a copy of an undated data screen synopsis; a Projected Promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014755

    Original file (20060014755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion states that she was granted a clearance on 26 March 2003 and promoted to first lieutenant with a DOR of 25 February 2003. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s military records to show her effective date of promotion to first lieutenant in the USAR is 9 December 2002 with a DOR of 9 December 2002. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show she was promoted to first lieutenant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090486C070212

    Original file (2003090486C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant with a date of rank and an effective date of 5 March 2002, by a Memorandum for Record, Subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, prepared by the Director, Personnel Actions and Services, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, dated 17 April 2002. The applicant is entitled to correction of his date of rank for promotion to 1LT to 20 June 2000, the date he would normally have been promoted to first lieutenant had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015045C070206

    Original file (20050015045C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve, ANC, as a second lieutenant effective 16 September 2000, with 1 year, 5 months, and 7 days CSC. In a Memorandum for Record (MFR), dated 7 November 2003, the Chief, Military Personnel Actions Branch, Human Resources Command (HRC) – St. Louis, Missouri, stated that the applicant could not be promoted at his promotion eligibility date of 8 April 2001, because all promotion qualifications were not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013460

    Original file (20070013460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USAHRC-STL memorandum, dated 13 April 2005, shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to 1LT by an Administrative Promotion Board that convened on 31 March 2005. USAHRC-STL Orders B-05-501580, dated 9 May 2005, show that the applicant was promoted to 1LT effective 18 April 2005, with a date of rank of 18 April 2005. Based on her date of rank of 18 April 2005 and completion of 5 years time in the lower grade, the applicant's promotion eligibility date (PED) for CPT is 17 April 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000061C070205

    Original file (20060000061C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his date of rank for captain to 29 May 1999. In an advisory opinion, dated 28 February 2006, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, stated that the applicant was considered and non-selected for promotion to captain by the 1997 RCSB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066315C070402

    Original file (2002066315C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was granted a security clearance on 11 May 2001; therefore, his date of rank is correct. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: The applicant was granted a security clearance on 11 May 2001; therefore, his date of rank for captain was properly established as the date that he was granted a security...