| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones, II | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was young and immature at the time he committed the offense that led to his discharge. He was depressed over his Grandmother's death and homesick. He found it impossible to return to Germany, but he neither understood nor considered the consequences of his behavior. He has grown up and still ashamed of his behavior. However, wishes to be able to admit that he was in the military. He describes his current life and the efforts he has made to improve his knowledge and skills.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant entered active duty on 5 October 1979 at age 24. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 64C (Motor Transport Operator) and was posted to Germany for duty.
The applicant was reported AWOL (absent without leave) on 23 June 1980. He surrendered to the military control on 4 October 1982.
On 9 December 1983, court-martial charges where brought against the applicant for 1,263 days of AWOL.
He consulted with counsel and was advised of his rights and options. He submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200, chapter 10. He acknowledged he had been advised of and understood his rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, that he was guilty as charged or guilty of a lesser included offense for which he could also receive a punitive discharge and that, as a result of his request, he could receive an UOTHC discharge which would deprive him of many or all of his benefits as a veteran, that he could expect to experience substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received an UOTHC discharge, and that there is no automatic upgrading or review of a less than honorable discharge.
On 24 January 1984, the discharge authority approved the applicant's request and directed that he be discharged UOTHC.
The applicant was discharged UOTHC, on 2 February 1984. He had 10 months and 13 days of creditable service with 1,263 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Table of Maximum Punishments shows that a punitive discharge is authorized for any AWOL of more that 30 days.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service. His extensive AWOL outweighs his 10 months of creditable service.
2. The applicant's contention that he was young and immature at the time is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief. The Board notes that the applicant was 24 years of age at the time he enlisted, had satisfactory completed basic and advanced training and had served for five months in Germany before going AWOL. His satisfactory performance demonstrates his capacity to serve and shows that he was neither too young nor immature.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
| CASE ID | AR2002079338 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030529 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | Upgrade discharge |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005558
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to honorable. On 13 August 1984, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued a DD Form 794A (Discharge Certificate Under Other Than Honorable Conditions). The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge UOTHC should be upgraded to honorable because he was young, scared, and made poor decisions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084965C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He states his request was denied and he was told to request leave after arriving in Germany.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006283
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The discharge authority approved the request for discharge, directed that the applicant be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade, and be separated with a UOTHC discharge. The Board notes that the applicant was 19 years of age at the time he entered active duty, had satisfactory completed training and had served for over two years before any negative incidents are documented.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020934
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. After consulting with counsel and being advised of his rights and options, the applicant submitted a formal request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012244
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge upgraded. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show his UOTHC discharge upgraded because he was young, had other prior commitments, and intended to return to his unit.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001823
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 23 April 1970, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for AWOL (7 days). On 22 August 1973, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) considered the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03092160C070212
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE : He requested discharge just to get out. The applicant was discharged on 2 May 1975.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086678C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068103C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES: “I…would like to request an upgrade on my discharge from the U.S. Army. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070469C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board notes that the applicant was 22...