Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079082C070215
Original file (2002079082C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 19 June 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002079082


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records:

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that all entries related to an erroneous charge of AWOL (absence without leave) for the period 27 April 2001 through 2 May 2001 be deleted from his record. His request to be paid the monies withheld for this AWOL period has been administratively accomplished.

3. The applicant states that he was on convalescent and/or ordinary leave during the period in question. He states that it was through miscommunications that he was charged as being AWOL and requests that now that the situation has been resolved that all references to the AWOL period be removed from his records.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 1 March 1985 and has had continuous service since that date. He was promoted to master sergeant (MSG) (E-8) on 1 August 1997.

5. In March 2001 the applicant underwent a second surgery for repair of a fracture of his right ankle at the Rodriguez Army Hospital, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico. He developed post-surgical complications and was placed on convalescent leave.

6. Due to slow recovery and the post-surgical complications, the applicant was authorized convalescent leave for the period 5 April through 26 April 2001.

7. The applicant received permanent change of stations (PCS) orders to report to the 4013th USAR Garrison Support Unit (Ft. Polk), Bossier Louisiana. His orders were modified following his surgery and again following his convalescent leave to show a reporting date of 27 April 2001.

8. A DD Form 689 (Individual Sick Slip), dated 27 April 2001, shows that the applicant’s physician placed him on convalescent leave for the period 27 April through 30 April 2001. This notice appears not to have been forwarded to the 4013th.

9. When the applicant did not report to the 4013th USAR Garrison Support Unit on the 27th, that unit reported him AWOL.

10. A memorandum signed by the Deputy Commander, Rodriguez Army Hospital, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, dated 30 April 2001, states that the applicant was to return to duty, effective 27 April 2001, on a half-day basis and start intensive physical rehabilitation. It stated that long car drives and traveling by himself is difficult and painful for the applicant.

11. Upon receiving a copy of the Commander’s memorandum, the applicant contacted a travel agency and arranged for the first available plane from Puerto Rico to Louisiana.

12. The applicant reported in to his new duty station on 3 May 2001.

13. As the 4013th reported the applicant as AWOL for the period 27 April 2001 through 3 May 2001, his pay was adjusted to recoup pay for this period.

14. A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 1 May 2001, indicates that a change of duty status was initiated to change the period of 27 April 2001 through 30 April 2001 to convalescent leave and the period 1 May 2001 through 3 May 2001 to ordinary leave. This form shows that the applicant’s PCS order had been amended five times.

15. The applicant’s new unit commander reviewed the situation and in a memorandum, dated 20 June 2001, determined that the applicant was not at fault for the errors and miscommunication that occurred resulting in his being shown to have been AWOL. He opined that the applicant had made a good faith effort to comply with conflicting information given him and requested that the applicant’s records be corrected to show the applicant as present for duty as of 30 April 2001 and in a leave status through 2 May 2001.

16. The applicant initiated action to have his records corrected through the Inspector Generals Office and, on 2 September 2002, submitted a request to this Board to have his records corrected to show the period in question was not period of AWOL, and that the monies recouped be returned to him.

17. Subsequent to the above request the applicant’s unit did correct the records it could and the applicant has received a payment of the monies recouped.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board concurs with the applicant’s commander that he did receive conflicting information.

2. The evidence of record clearly shows that during the period of 27 April through 30 April 2001, the applicant was in a convalescent leave status. Therefore, it concludes that all of the applicant’s records should be corrected to show this period as convalescent leave.

3. The Board further concurs with the applicant’s unit commander that he made the best possible effort to correct his status and report to his new unit as promptly as he was physically able to do so. Therefore, the Board concludes that it is in the interest of justice to correct the applicant’s records to show that the applicant was granted ordinary leave for the period 1 May through 2 May 2001.

4. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below will correct an error.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

a. showing that the individual concerned was on convalescent leave for the period 27 April through 30 April 2001 and on ordinary leave 1 May through 2 May 2001; and

b. purging all reference to the applicant having been considered AWOL for the period 27 April through 2 May 2001.


BOARD VOTE:

__JNS___ ___LEM_ __WDP__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _ John N. Slone_____
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002079082
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030619
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. Delete AWOL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009255C070206

    Original file (20050009255C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant and his family were stationed in Puerto Rico; that the applicant received orders, was reassigned to a dependent restricted tour, and arrived in Honduras on 16 April 2003; and that his family remained in Puerto Rico until his return to Puerto Rico on 18 May 2004. The advisory opinion offers that the evidence of record indicates that, prior to reporting to Honduras, the applicant was improperly advised that his COLA and OHA allowances would continue...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007061

    Original file (20070007061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion enclosed DA Forms 3349s dated 11 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, showing the applicant was on a physical profile during these periods and was unable to perform his military duties and responsibilities. The advisory opinion also stated that Army Regulation 135-381, paragraph 1-8 provides that a member who is unable to perform military duties because of incapacitation is entitled to full pay and allowances, including all incentive pay to which entitled, less any civilian earned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016161

    Original file (20140016161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of – * a 31 October 1970 physical profile * a 31 January 1971 pay voucher * a 30 December 1971 inquiry to the National Personnel Center by his mother * a 29 March 1972 request for information reply * five letters from the American Red Cross (in Spanish), 14 January 1971, 21 October 1971, 14 December 1971, 16 December 1971, and 19 September 1972 * U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Buchanan Special Orders Number 22, dated 31 January 1975 * 3 February 1975 request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014465

    Original file (20090014465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) and transfer to the Retired Reserve be voided and that he be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES). While it cannot be determined based on the available evidence the extent of the applicant's disabilities at the time of his REFRAD and discharge, there is sufficient evidence to show he was being treated for depression while on active duty and prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054870C070420

    Original file (2001054870C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show 14 days of ordinary leave for the period 27 July 1999 to 8 August 1999 be charged as convalescent leave. DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave) authorizing the applicant’s convalescent leave for the period 27 July 1999 to 8 August 1999 is not in his personnel records. This form further shows that an official of the Defense Military Pay Office contacted the Darnall Army Community Hospital and obtained the proper documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006683

    Original file (20130006683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was considered by a medical evaluation board (MEB) for the purpose of qualifying for a medical discharge. On 22 July 2005, she underwent a separation physical at Fort Benning, GA; however, her DD Form 2808 is unavailable for review. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that govern the evaluation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017919

    Original file (20130017919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: The applicant's request, statement, and supporting documents are provided by his counsel. The applicant's counsel argues that at the time the applicant completed the DDESS enrollment form on 30 April 2007 his assignment in Puerto Rico was scheduled to terminate on 25 July 2008 and the applicant had not been informed that his request for extension had been denied; therefore, the applicant did not make a false official statement. In regard to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001210

    Original file (20070001210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070001210 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s records do not contain a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period of active duty that commenced on or about 7 December 2003. The applicant has not specified in his request what he believes to be the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067798C070402

    Original file (2002067798C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commander indicated that the reason for the separation action was that the applicant was absent without authorization from his duties at the MATES. The unit commander indicated that this was an act of misconduct and a violation of the Military Code of Puerto Rico and Puerto Rico ARNG Regulation 635-100. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075899C070403

    Original file (2002075899C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Accordingly, on 8 May 1973, the...