| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Beverly A. Young | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Tracey Pinson | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for combat injuries that he received while under enemy fire.
3. The applicant states that he was injured while in Vietnam. He contends that the convoy that he was in was hit by small arms fire. He claims that he spent 5 months in a hospital, 3 days in Da Nang, 8 days in Tokyo, and 21 days in Fort Ord, California, to recover from his wounds. He did not submit any documents in support of his application.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 February 1966 for a period of three years. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 71N (Moving Specialist). He served in Germany from 24 June 1966 through 15 May 1967 and in Vietnam from 13 July 1967 through 23 May 1968. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 25 September 1968.
5. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), which was authenticated in his own hand at the time of his separation from the Service, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
6. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence in his records that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entry in
item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
7. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was assigned as a patient to the Medical Holding Detachment, 249th General Hospital in Japan on 3 June 1968. There are no medical records available to the Board which shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.
8. Review of the applicant's personnel records revealed that he is entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Meritorious Unit Commendation which are not shown on his discharge document.
9. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal. Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 lists, in pertinent part, the military campaigns of the Vietnam War. Based on the applicant’s dates of service in Vietnam, Appendix B shows that he participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III Campaign, the Tet Counteroffensive Campaign and the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV Campaign during the Vietnam War.
10. The applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 523rd Transportation Company, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the period 2 September 1967 to 31 March 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 31, dated 1969.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he was injured while in Vietnam when the convoy that he was in was hit by small arms fire.
2. The Board noted that the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was assigned as a patient to the Medical Holding Detachment, 249th General Hospital in Japan. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board which shows that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action.
3. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.
4. Orders show the applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this foreign unit award.
5. While the applicant was assigned to the 523rd Transportation Company, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation. Therefore, he is entitled to award the Meritorious Unit Commendation and correction of his records to show this award.
6. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned; and
b. by adding award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Meritorious Unit Commendation.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
KAK____ MHM____ TLP_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Karol A. Kennedy______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002078916 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030128 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT IN PART |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Schneider |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019855
The evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded in action on 25 April 1970 in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 1 April 1969 through 31 March 1971 * adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070791C070402
There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The applicant signed his discharge document on 7 July 1968 attesting to the fact that he was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in five campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star for wear on his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000891
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support awarding the applicant the Purple Heart and correcting his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 26 January 1969, in the Republic of Vietnam; and b. showing award of the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021312
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to list the Bronze Star Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster and the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002010
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, Bronze Star Medal, and Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. The available records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and that he participated in two campaigns while serving in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Bronze...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064686C070421
With the loss of his eye, he was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board and subsequently to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) correctly shows that he participated in five campaign periods during his service in Vietnam. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned is awarded the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Service Medal with a silver service star, Republic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072813C070403
The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records, which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to the Purple Heart by virtue of the wounds he suffered in Vietnam on 24 April 1967, as authenticated by his DA Form 20.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075106C070403
The applicant requests, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), correction of her late husband’s military records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Purple Heart. The FSM’s discharge document with an effective date of 12 January 1972 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. Notwithstanding the newspaper articles which state that the FSM received the Bronze Star Medal for achievement, there is no evidence of record available to the Board which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027671
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. General orders awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 18 August 1969 in Vietnam which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073111C070403
Item 41, Awards and Decorations, of the DA Form 20, is void of an entry showing the applicant's entitlement to award of the Purple Heart. To be awarded the Purple Heart, the applicant would have to show that he was wounded and that: (1) the wound was the result of hostile action; (2) the wound required medical treatment; and (3) the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. The Board notes that the only substantiated/supported wound that the applicant sustained is not...