| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, he would like to have his discharge upgraded to be able to display it to his family and friends. He states that he was at his duty station for less than a year and yet got the "worst possible discharge". He states that he deserves justice. He contends that the letters of support and reference he submits shows that he warrants an upgrade.
The statements submitted on behalf of the applicant describe him as a hardworking church going man with a devotion to survive. They consider him an asset to his community and a man who has a positive attitude and is willing to do a little bit more than is required of him.
Also submitted are copies of post service education and training certificates, a general education development (GED) certificate, a Certificate in Carpentry, a Small Water Systems Certificate, and a community college certificate in Welding.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel offered no additional arguments or contentions beyond that submitted with the application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant entered active duty on 13 February 1976. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training without reported incidents.
On 30 March 1977, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for two counts of driving under the influence of alcohol.
On 16 May 1977, the applicant's company commander referred him to the Army Drug and Alcohol Prevention and Counseling Program (ADAPCP) for drug and alcohol rehabilitation. The applicant was found nondependent and placed in a halfway house program.
Following the applicant's ADAPCP, the applicant received a NJP for illegal use of drugs on 20 May 1977.
The applicant was also afforded a rehabilitative transfer due to the confidential nature of his enrollment in ADAPCP.
The applicant received two NJPs for being absent without leave (AWOL) 1 day and 3 days respectfully on 22 September 1977 and 29 September 1977.
On 8 October 1977, the applicant made a suicidal gesture by cutting both of his wrists. As a result of the suicide gesture, the applicant was hospitalized and referred to psychiatry for evaluation.
A Report of Mental Status, dated 13 October 1977, shows that the applicant was free of any psychosis or severe neurosis that would preclude administrative separation. In a handwritten addition it was noted that the applicant had a passive dependant personality.
On 19 October 1977 the applicant's unit commander initiated discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-5a(1) for misconduct, frequent involvement of discreditable nature with authorities. The unit commander cited the applicant's history of 4 NJPs and 13 negative counseling statements (7 for failure to repair, 4 for wearing his uniform improperly, 1 for driving with revoked privileges, and 1 for the attempted suicide) not related to the NJPs, as reason for discharge.
On 21 October 1977, he acknowledged and waived rights to have his case reviewed by a board of officers, to have counsel, or to submit a personal statement on his own behalf.
On 25 October 1977, the applicant received a fifth NJP, for 1 day AWOL, failure to obey a lawful order, and breaking restriction.
On 8 November 1977, a line of duty determination was made that the applicant's attempted gesture was not in the line of duty. It also noted the applicant was AWOL at the time.
The applicant's record shows that he was AWOL from 7 through 10 November 1977.
The discharge authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed that the applicant receive an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
The applicant was discharged on 11 November 1977, under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-5a(1). He had 1 year, 8 months, and 21 days of creditable service with 8 days lost due to AWOL.
The Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade on 16 July 1980.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the policy and prescribes the procedures for administrative separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 13-5a(1) provided for the separation for misconduct, frequent incidents of a discreditable nature. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
2. The Board notes the applicant’s post service activities, however, these activities are not so exceptionally meritorious as to outweigh the offense that resulted in his discharge especially in light of the fact that his military record is devoid of significant service.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
| CASE ID | AR2002078683 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030204 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001009
The unit social work officer recommended the applicant be considered for an honorable discharge from the military service due to rehabilitation failure. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged from active duty in pay grade E-1 on 2 December 1977, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-5a(1) and issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge was a separation with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088829C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. An under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000673C071029
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a psychological evaluation, dated 4 August 2004; and medical records, dated 2001, 2002, and 2003. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014300
On 30 November 1977, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13-5a(1) with a General Discharge Certificate. The available evidence does not show the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088346C070403
The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 3 November 1977...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059854C070421
He states that before leaving Panama, he was told that he would be given the opportunity to go through a rehabilitation program for alcohol and substance abuse at Fort Jackson, South Carolina prior to being separated from the Army and that upon his successful completion of that program he would be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 and given a GD. On 23 October 1974, an administrative separation board of officers convened to consider the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068363C070402
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 22 July 1965, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. Army Regulation 635-200 is the current regulation that governs the separation of enlisted soldiers.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606005C070209
On 18 January 1978, the applicants commander officially recommended that the applicant be discharged under paragraph 13-5, Army Regulation 635-200, for misconduct because of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature; He indicated that the applicants conduct and efficiency were unsatisfactory; that the applicant was sent to the USARB for the purpose of receiving correctional training and treatment necessary to return him to duty as a well-trained soldier with improved attitude and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008944
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Considering the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ on ten different occasions, the characterization of his service as under other than honorable conditions was and still is appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090881C070212
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was denied medical treatment for an injured right hand at any time. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested and, therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.