| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: He states that, at the time of the discharge, he was young and having family problems. An officer told him it would be better for the service if he took the undesirable discharge. He just wanted to go home.
He submits statements from his sister, a friend and a minister. He also submits a report from the local sheriff.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted and entered active duty on 11 June 1969. He was 20 years old, married and had a step daughter.
The applicant completed training as an artilleryman with excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and without a discreditable incident of record. He was under orders to Vietnam when he failed to report to the overseas replacement station. He was then absent without leave AWOL from 4 November 1969 to 5 January 1970, from 11 January to 17 May 1970 and 29 June to 26 August 1970. On 2 October 1970 he was separated with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He had 7 months and 13 days of creditable service and 246 days AWOL. The discharge processing documents are not contained in the available records.
There is no evidence that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within the allowed 15-year time frame.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
The letter from the applicant's sister states that he has been doing good for the past 9 years but that he has lots of medical problems and needs all the help he can get. The friend states that she and her husband have known the applicant for 2 or 3 years and that he is a "gift of help" but that he has many health problems. The minister writes that the applicant is a faithful worker in the church. He participates in outreach programs and is part of extra fellowships. He helps those less fortunate than himself and has been a "special influence and inspiration in my family." The sheriff's report shows that the applicant's most recent of five arrests occurred in February 1988 and resulted in a 15-year sentence for his second conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.
2. The applicant's undocumented assertion of family problems and his contention that he was young and immature have been noted, but he demonstrated a capacity for honorable service by completion of training and approximately 6 months of service with excellent ratings and without a discreditable incident of record.
3. The evidence of the applicant's recent behavior and the indications that he has turned his life around have been considered but these factors fail to outweigh the negative aspects of his military record.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__WTM__ __CJP__ __YM ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002078322 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030130 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR .635-200, CH 10 . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011515C070208
He notes that, although his medical records verify his wounds, the Purple Heart does not show on his record. There is no evidence of record relating to the of the applicant's discharge. _Thomas D. Howard, Jr. CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20040011515 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON | | |DATE BOARDED |20051103 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |UD | |DATE OF DISCHARGE |19770721 | |DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 635-200, Ch 10 | |DISCHARGE REASON | | |BOARD DECISION | DENY | |REVIEW AUTHORITY | | |ISSUES 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082573C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The available records show that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606810C070209
He further stated that he believed a discharge would be best for himself, his family and the Army On 26 September 1975 the appropriate authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant has provided no evidence and the records contain none that support his request to upgrade his discharge. Finally, he had the option of resubmitting another compassionate reassignment request, which he chose to disregard,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072525C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: When such separation was warranted, an undesirable discharge was considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006962
On 14 January 1972, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 23 November 1975, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge. After several years of hard drinking, the applicant decided to clean up his life and he joined Alcoholics Anonymous.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081197C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In support of his application he submits a statement from a psychiatrist and a letter from his sister. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012530
On 7 September 1962, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Individuals would be discharged by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge when it had been determined that an individual's military record was characterized by discredit, including frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. When authorized,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083186C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057542C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The Board notes that the applicant was 20 years of age at the time of his first AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084965C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He states his request was denied and he was told to request leave after arriving in Germany.