Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078082C070215
Original file (2002078082C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 April 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002078082

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Harry B. Oberg Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her administrative discharge be changed to a medical separation.

APPLICANT STATES: That she was injured during training and she was told that she was getting a medical discharge because she could not continue to train. She provides her discharge packet as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

A DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings) dated 17 November 2000 shows the applicant entered active duty on 19 September 2000.

The DA Form 4707 shows the applicant started having problems with low back pain two weeks previously (on or about 3 November 2000). She had had no previous problems with her back. X-ray and laboratory results revealed she had spondylolisthesis L5 over S1 second degree and spina bifida occulta. It was recommended she be separated for failing to meet medical procurement standards. She met medical retention standards.

On 21 November 2000, the applicant concurred with the proceedings and requested she be retained on active duty.

On 11 December 2000, it was recommended the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11. She still requested retention. The battalion-level commander indicated that her medical condition did not support retention and recommended her separation. The approval action and her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) are not available.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate military medical authority within 6 months of the soldier’s initial entrance of active duty that would have permanently or temporarily disqualified him or her for entry into the military service or entry on active duty had it been detected at that time and does not disqualify him or her for retention.

Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for procurement, retention, and separation. Chapter 2 (physical standards for enlistment, appointment, and induction), paragraph 2-36 (spine and sacroiliac joints), subparagraph 2-36j, states that spina bifida when symptomatic is a cause for rejection. Subparagraph 2-36m states that spondylolisthesis is a cause for rejection.

Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3 (medical fitness standards for retention and separation including retirement), paragraph 3-39 (spine, scapulae, ribs, and sacroiliac joints), subparagraph 3-39a(2), states that spina bifida with demonstrable signs and moderate symptoms of root or cord involvement is a cause for referral to a medical evaluation board (MEB). Subparagraph 3-39a(3) states that spondylolisthesis with more than mild symptoms resulting in repeated outpatient visits or repeated hospitalization or limitations affecting performance of duty is a cause for referral to an MEB.

Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The regulation defines “physically unfit” as unfitness due to physical disability. In pertinent part, it states that according to accepted medical principles, certain abnormalities and residual conditions exist that, when discovered, lead to the conclusion that they must have existed or have started before the individual entered the military service. Examples are congenital malformations and hereditary conditions or similar conditions in which medical authorities are in such consistent and universal agreement as to their cause and time of origin that no additional confirmation is needed to support the conclusion that they existed prior to military service.

Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 5, provides for the separation of an enlisted soldier for non-service aggravated EPTS (existed prior to service) conditions when the soldier requests waiver of physical evaluation board evaluation. The soldier must be eligible for referral into the disability system and must not meet medical retention standards.

Medlineplus.gov, a National Institutes of Health Internet site, provided information on spina bifida and spondylolisthesis. Spina bifida occurs when the tissue surrounding a baby's developing spinal cord does not close properly. Spina bifida occulta is the mildest form of the condition. It results in a small separation of the spinal bones. This can occur in any vertebra but is most common at the base of the back or lower spine. Because the spinal nerves are not involved, most children with this form of spina bifida have no symptoms and experience no neurologic problems.


Spondylolysis is a stress fracture in one of the vertebrae. If the stress fracture weakens the bone so much that it is unable to maintain its proper position, the vertebrae can start to slip out of place. This condition is called spondylolisthesis. Spondylolisthesis usually occurs in the last lumbar vertebra, just above the tailbone. There may be a genetic aspect to spondylolysis. An individual may be born with thin vertebral bone and therefore be vulnerable to this condition. Also, some sports, such as gymnastics, weight lifting and football, put a great deal of stress on the bones in the lower back which can result in a stress fracture. The athlete should take a break from the activities until symptoms go away, as they often do. In most cases, activities can be resumed gradually.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board acknowledges that the applicant may not have had a previous history of back pain until after her entry in to the Army. However, once her lower back pain developed and medical personnel examined her to look for the cause of the pain, her previously existing conditions were discovered.

3. X-rays revealed the applicant had spondylolisthesis and spina bifida occulta. Considering she had spina bifida occulta, it is reasonable to believe that her spondylolisthesis was the result of genetics rather than sporting or physical activities.

4. Since the applicant's spina bifida was symptomatic, she did not meet procurement medical standards. However, since there were no demonstrable signs and no moderate symptoms of root or cord involvement, she was not eligible for referral to an MEB. Neither was she eligible for referral to an MEB as a result of her spondylolisthesis because she did not have more than mild symptoms.

5. Although the applicant requested retention on active duty, the Board believes her commanders made a proper decision not to approve her retention and to separate her instead. As a trainee, she could not have been given the break from activities treatment would have required. Since she did not meet the criteria for referral into the physical disability system, consideration for her health required she be administratively separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wtm___ __hbo___ __rjw___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002078082
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030417
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 108.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101468C070208

    Original file (2004101468C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 October 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004101468 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He was not disabled prior to enlisting in the military. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01339

    Original file (PD-2014-01339.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain ... (Subuming Spondylolysis/Spondylosisthesis)523920%Lumbar Spine Spondylolysis ... (Subsuming Bilateral Radiculopathy)523920%20091228Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 20%RATING: 20%...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009481

    Original file (20060009481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) Proceedings) explains that he was discharged because of the medical condition of Spina-bifida. He was discharged from active duty, in pay grade E-1, on 3 February 1983, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, “Did not meet procurement medical fitness standards – no disability.” His character of service was "Uncharacterized." The evidence shows he was found not medically qualified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007338

    Original file (20100007338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his military records be changed to show he was discharged for a reason other than "failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards." On 28 October 2004, an EPSBD found the applicant medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. The EPSBD further found the applicant did meet retention standards under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01096

    Original file (PD-2012-01096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201096 SEPARATION DATE: 20030904 BOARD DATE: 20130228 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92G10/Food Service Specialist), medically separated for mechanical lower back pain secondary to congenital vertebral anomaly (spinal bifida) with characteristic pain on motion. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02758

    Original file (PD-2013-02758.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20071123 Since then, he had noted re-aggravation of his LBP. The Board noted that the ROM for both the MEB and VA examinations supports a 20% rating, but the criteria for a 40% rating are not met.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02063

    Original file (PD2013 02063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that his case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of his MH condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed during that process. At the MEB examination on 8 September 2005, the CI reported chronic LBP. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501165

    Original file (ND0501165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01165 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050706. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). On DD Form 2807, Question 12c, the Applicant denied having “Recurrent back pain or any back problem.” While on active duty, the Applicant encountered significant back pain that was ultimately diagnosed by Navy medical professionals as Spina Bifida Occulta.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140003753

    Original file (AR20140003753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 4 August 1980 * Optional Form 275 (Medical Record Report), dated 30 April 1981, pertaining to Silas B. Hays Army Community Hospital Transfer Summary * 2 Standard Forms 519-A (Radiographic Report), dated 2 and 4 May 1981 * Optional Form 275, dated 1 July 1981, pertaining to his MEB * U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USPDA) Form 18 (Revised PEB Proceedings) (first page only), dated 10 September 1981 * DA...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02203

    Original file (PD-2013-02203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lumbar Spine Condition . The examiner noted that three repetitions did not further reduce the lumbar ROM.Radiographs of the lumbar spine showed the transitional vertebra with normal spine alignment and normal S1 joints.At the VA C&P peripheral nerves examination on 25 April 2009 the CI reported back pain that radiated down both legs, at times to the heels. The VA rated the lumbar spine DDD at 20%, coded 5242 and denied service-connection for radiculopathy.