| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Ms. Yalonda Maldonado | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his record be corrected to show that he retired from the Army with 20 years of active service.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was medically retired from the Army. He wanted to stay in until September [1998];however, he was not allowed to do so. He should be retired with 20 years of active service. He was informed at the time of his discharge that he had 20 years of service. He enlisted in the Army on 19 July 1978 in the delayed entry program (DEP). He was honorably discharged under the impression that he had 20 years of service. Had he known otherwise, he would have tried to stay on active duty until September. He did not choose to leave; consequently he should not be denied the full benefit of 20 years of service. He received a retirement service bulletin stating that retirees who are 60 percent disabled will receive $50.00 per month.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 6 years on 27 July 1978. He was discharged from the Army Reserve on 19 September 1978, and enlisted in the Regular Army the following day for three years. He remained on continuous active duty until his discharge in July 1998.
A DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 26 July 1995, indicates that the applicant’s physical profile serial was 4 3 2 1 1 1, because of diffuse joint and muscle pain (fibromyalgias). That form indicated that a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) had been completed and that a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) was pending.
In 1996 the applicant voluntarily agreed to an extension of his separation date in order to complete medical evaluation proceedings. On 2 April 1996 the applicant reenlisted in the Army for two years.
On 11 December 1996 the applicant’s physical profile serial and condition mirrored the July 1995 report.
In January 1998 the applicant agreed to an extension of his separation date of 1 April 1998 for the purpose of completion of medical treatment or physical disability processing. The 101st Airborne Division, the applicant’s major command, approved an extension of the applicant’s separation date until 30 September 1998.
On 24 July 1998 the applicant retired because of a permanent physical disability. The percentage of his disability was 40 percent. He had 19 years, 10 months, and 5 days of active service, and 1 month, and 23 days of inactive service.
The applicant’s medical evaluation board and physical evaluation board proceedings are not available.
On 3 July 2000 the VA notified the applicant that his disability rating for gastroesophageal reflux with hiatal hernia had increased from zero percent to 10 percent. His combined evaluation was 60 percent. That notification provided a history of his monthly compensation, and indicated that he had waived retired pay on 1 July 2000.
Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent.
Army Regulation 635-40 states that a soldier is eligible for disability retired pay if he has a disability rating of 30 percent or more. The percentage multiplier is either the total disability percent rating or 2 1/2 percent of the total years of service (including any fraction thereof, that is, 7 months equals 7/12 and disregard any fraction of a month). Use the higher percentage of the two, but not more than 75 percent, as a multiplier of the retired pay base to arrive at the retired pay entitlement. An example: A soldier with 19 years and 6 months of service and 30 percent or more disability is retired because of disability. His retirement pay entitlement (19 6/12 X 2.5) is 48.7 percent of his retired pay base. If his disability rating is less than 48.7 percent, only that portion (retired pay base times the disability rating of his retired pay) may be tax free.
Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
The FY2000 Defense Authorization Act provided for special compensation to certain severely disabled uniformed services retirees. Non-disability retirees with a VA service-connected total disability rating will receive $300 per month; with a 90 percent rating, $200 per month; and with a 80 or 70 percent rating, $100 per month. To be eligible, retirees must not be retired for disability, must have 20 or more years of creditable service, and must have been rated 70 percent or more disabled by the VA within four years after the effective date of retirement and must currently have that or a higher disability rating.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Absent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant’s physical evaluation board processing and his subsequent retirement because of physical disability was in accordance with law and applicable regulations.
2. Notwithstanding his contention, there is no evidence, nor has he provided any, to show that he was unfairly or unjustly treated. The fact that the law now entitles soldiers with regular retired pay and with certain disability ratings to receive a special compensation, is no reason now to correct his record to show that he had 20 years of active service for retirement purposes. To do so would give him an unfair advantage over other veterans in a like situation as himself.
3. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__WTM __CJP__ ___YM___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002078048 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030130 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 136.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004169C070208
Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant initially entered active duty in July 1972 and was discharged in February 1975 after serving a period of 2 years, 6 months, and 5 days. The MEB document notes that the applicant did not desire to continue on active duty. On 2 June 1995 the applicant was retired by reason of physical disability in pay grade E-7.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106345C070208
The applicant provides copies of his service medical records in support of his request. An informal PEB, conducted on 22 April 2003, concluded that the applicant’s Crohn’s Disease rendered the applicant medically unfit and recommended retirement by reason of physical disability with a 30 percent disability rating. While the documents associated with either the applicant’s request for or declination of continued active duty were not available to the Board, the evidence which is available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106023C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document be corrected to show that his retirement date from active service, by reason of physical disability, was 4 June 1993 vice 6 January 1992. On 27 August 1991 the applicant underwent a physical evaluation at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as part of a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). At the time the applicant’s name was placed on the TDRL, financially he would have received nearly identical amounts of retired pay, whether in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054605C070420
The applicant’s formal PEB convened on 24 May 2000 and concluded the applicant was unfit for continued military service because of “chronic neck and back pain and polyarthralgias status post L4-5 laminectomy and L4-5 and L5-S1 interbody fusion.” The formal board noted the applicant “has constant severe pain which disrupts sleep and required frequent use of narcotic pain medications.” The formal PEB recommended a disability rating of 20 percent in accordance with the U.S. Army Physical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007116C070208
LaVerne Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The amounts will increase each year until January of 2014 when eligible members will receive their full retired pay entitlement and their VA disability compensation with no reduction. The evidence available to the Board confirms that the applicant was retired by reason of physical disability in 2002 and that she had over 20 years of active service at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006129C070205
The applicant states, in effect, that he should be credited with a total of 296 points for the retirement year beginning 8 April 1970 and ending 7 April 1971 because he served on active duty during that period and 281 active duty points and 15 membership points are not recorded in his military records. The evidence of record also shows that, at that time, the applicant should have been credited with 82 membership points and 6,700 active duty points, for a total of 6,782 retirement points...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006026
The applicant requests, in effect, that: a. item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty [AD] This Period), item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), item 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12f (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued at the time of his retirement on 20 April 1997 (which will simply be referred to as his DD Form 214 throughout the remainder of these proceedings) be corrected; b. his retirement pay be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005967
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of having been retired for permanent disability. The applicant states: * in January 2003, he was a mobilized U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier serving in Kuwait * he started having respiratory problems and was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and was sent back to Fort Polk, LA, for a medical evaluation board (MEB) * on 25 December 2003, he was placed on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017822
For his unfitting disabilities, the VA proposed a 50 percent combined rating as follows: * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (claimed as shortness of breath) 30 percent * Degenerative disc disease, lumbar spine (claimed as back condition) 10 percent * Left shoulder strain with post-surgical pain (claimed as left shoulder condition) 10 percent * Cervicalgia with degenerative disc disease, cervical spine (also claimed as neck condition) 10 percent b. For his service-connected disabilities, the VA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005987l
The PEB concluded that the applicant was found medically unfit for further military service under the provisions of paragraph 3-13d(2b) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) and granted him a combined rating of 60 percent disability. Hence, a 60 percent disability combined with a 20 percent disability results in a combined rating of 68 percent. The combined rating for any combination of disabilities can be determined by first arranging the disabilities in their exact...