Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078043C070215
Original file (2002078043C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 January 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002078043

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Chairperson
Ms. Gail J. Wire Member
Mr. Patrick H. McGarthy, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

APPLICANT STATES: That she has never remarried and she and the FSM spoke often. He informed her that his wife at the time of his death was going to divorce him and he was extremely upset over this. At that time he informed her that should anything happen to him she would receive his SBP. She is the mother of his only child and she is the person listed on the paperwork as the intended beneficiary. She believes that the FSM being served with divorce papers only 2 hours before his fatal accident caused his death. This is only speculation on her part and she realizes it cannot be used in the Board's decision.

As supporting evidence, she provides an affidavit from the FSM's mother who stated that the FSM told her on several occasions that the applicant and their son were the beneficiaries of all his military retired pay and/or all benefits from the military in the event of his death. He showed her a copy of a form he filled out before his death in which the applicant's name is listed to be the recipient of his military benefits in the event of his death.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 September 1980. An Application for Uniformed Services Identification Card DEERS Enrollment, DD Form 1172, shows he and the applicant married on 26 June 1988.

Apparently, the FSM and the applicant divorced on 30 March 1994. The divorce decree is not available.

The FSM retired early on 1 October 1995. At that time, he completed a Data for Payment of Retired Personnel, DD Form 2656. The applicant is listed in section III as the designated beneficiary for his unpaid retired pay. She and their son are listed in section VI (Dependency Information). In section VII, the FSM checked item 20a, that he elected spouse only SBP coverage. (Item 20e in section VII provides for former spouse coverage.)

The FSM married again on or about 9 October 1998. Divorce papers were filed on 3 December 2001. Notice was given to the FSM to appear for a hearing on 19 December 2001. The FSM died on 12 December 2001 as a result of injuries received in a motorcycle accident.

By letter dated 22 February 2002, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) extended their sympathy to the applicant on the death of her "husband." DFAS also provided her a Claim for Unpaid Compensation so she could apply for any unpaid retired pay due the FSM.

Records at DFAS show that the FSM's widow is drawing the SBP annuity.

Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Elections are made by category, not by name. To retain annuity eligibility, a surviving spouse cannot remarry before age 55.

Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes that it cannot be determined whether or not the applicant was the FSM's legal spouse at the time he retired. It appears the FSM and the applicant divorced on 30 March 1994, prior to his retirement and election of spouse SBP coverage in 1995.

2. Notwithstanding the actual date of the applicant's divorce from the FSM, SBP elections are made by category, not by name, and the FSM was still married to another woman at the time of his death. The only by-name beneficiary entered on the DD Form 2656 is for unpaid retired pay, for which it appears the applicant has already submitted her claim. The DD Form 2656 indicated that spouse coverage and former spouse coverage were two different categories of coverage. There is no evidence to show that the FSM was not cognizant of this difference.

3. In addition, the FSM’s SBP election of spouse coverage was in effect on the day he died; therefore, at the one-year anniversary of their marriage his widow acquired proprietary rights over the annuity as the FSM’s legal beneficiary. Despite the initiated, but not completed, divorce action, the Board will not take any action to prevent the lawful beneficiary from receiving those benefits.


4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT


________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__KAN__ __GJW _ __PHM __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002078043
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/01/23
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019394

    Original file (20110019394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * She mailed a deemed election form and the divorce decree to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in a timely manner (January 2010) * Her request was initially denied by DFAS because they were unable to find the paperwork * The record reflects she did not file the paperwork within the proper time frame * It would be unjust to deny her SBP benefits because DFAS was unable to locate the records * It was the FSM's request per the Stipulation Agreement of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022968

    Original file (20100022968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. However, there was no such court order to maintain the applicant as the FSM's beneficiary as his "former spouse" on his SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018015

    Original file (20140018015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided the FSM's DD Form 2656, dated 17 May 2003, showing the FSM elected former spouse coverage. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS, dated 16 June 2014, which states: * she was not entitled to receive an annuity under SBP * the FSM elected to cover her under SBP upon his retirement * a spouse loses eligibility as a spouse beneficiary upon divorce * retirees have the option to change their spouse coverage to former spouse coverage upon divorce, but the request from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020985

    Original file (20100020985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her husband, a deceased former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage within 1 year of their divorce and that she is entitled to an SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant states she was denied SBP benefits because his change of election form never made it into his records. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000571

    Original file (20130000571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests the records of the applicant's deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce and the SBP annuity be paid to her. The Board previously twice denied the applicant's request because the FSM did not change his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" and the applicant did not deem the election within one year of her divorce. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020113

    Original file (20140020113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his survivor benefit plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" (FS) within 1 year of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant's applied to DFAS for an SBP annuity; however, on 22 February 2014, DFAS responded to her request denying an SBP annuity due to the FSM never making a valid request to change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002359

    Original file (20080002359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that she be paid the Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) annuity as the former spouse of her ex-husband, a former service member (FSM). There is no record of the FSM being divorced from the applicant and there is no change of option from spouse to former spouse indicated in his records. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021045

    Original file (20130021045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The divorce decree shows that the Court ordered the FSM to execute the documents required "to effect the expressed reservation of the said military retirement account." The evidence of record shows that an SBP annuity has not been paid to the applicant because neither the FSM nor the applicant notified DFAS within 1 year from the date of their divorce to change the FSM's SBP beneficiary to former spouse. Additionally, if the applicant is able to show when the FSM married Renee B. and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022870

    Original file (20110022870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) * Statement from FSM requesting that the applicant receive continued SBP coverage, dated 3 November 2011 * A letter, dated 19 April 2011, from her attorney * Amended court order, dated 22 September 2005 * Personal statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The FSM and applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008388

    Original file (20110008388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication the FSM informed DFAS of his divorce or that his former spouse made a deemed election to change SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within one year of the date of the divorce. On 19 July 2010, by letter, a DFAS official further notified the applicant that in order for the former spouse to be eligible for the SBP, the former spouse must be awarded the SBP annuity in the divorce decree and she would have had to deem the election within one year of her divorce....