Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077962C070215
Original file (2002077962C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 29 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077962

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Frank C. Jones Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his service in the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) from June 1975 to December 1977 and in the Merchant Marine from December 1978 to September 1979 be added to his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he is not being credited with all the time he served. As supporting evidence, he provides a one-page document from Balboa High School explaining its credit system; an undated letter from the Department of Defense Education Activity Records Center, Fort Benning, GA certifying the applicant graduated from Paraiso Junior-Senior High School on 15 December 1977; and an undated letter from the Panama Canal Commission certifying the applicant was a laborer with the Panama Canal Company, an agency of the U. S. Government in the Republic of Panama, from 18 December 1978 to 24 February 1979 and from 10 May 1979 to 29 September 1979.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He initially served in the Army National Guard (ARNG) from 21 June 1984 through 5 March 1985 when he was discharged for an unknown reason. His NGB Form 22 for this period of service shows he completed 8 months and 15 days of net service this period. It does not indicate he had prior service.

The applicant reenlisted in the ARNG on 27 June 1985. He was separated from the ARNG on 27 June 1988 and was transferred to the U. S. Army Control Group (Reinforcement). His NGB Form 22 for this period of service shows he completed 3 years of net service this period and had 8 months and 15 days of prior Reserve component service for a total of 3 years, 8 months, and 15 days of service for pay.

Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7B, states that service as a member of ROTC is creditable service for pay provided the member has concurrent Reserve status for duty performed on or after 1 August 1979.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, Personnel Actions and Services Directorate. That office stated that Army Transport Service is creditable to Merchant Seamen and/or civilian sailors who served on an ocean-going ship during the period 7 September 1941 through 31 December 1946.

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The evidence provided by the applicant shows he graduated from high school in December 1977. It appears he participated in ROTC while in high school and not as an ROTC cadet with concurrent Reserve status on or after 1 August 1979. Therefore, his participation in ROTC is not creditable service for pay and would not have been entered on his NGB Form 22.

3. The evidence provided by the applicant shows he worked as a laborer with the Panama Canal Company from December 1978 to February 1979 and from May to September 1979. Army Transport Service is creditable to Merchant Seamen and/or civilian sailors who served on an ocean-going ship during the period 7 September 1941 through 31 December 1946. Therefore, his work with the Panama Canal Company in 1978 and 1978 is not creditable service for pay and would not have been entered on his NGB Form 22.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__lls___ __le____ _fcj ____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077962
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030529
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 135.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082409C070215

    Original file (2002082409C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The date of award of this MOS is not of record.] A “Officer’s Commission” Certificate which states “…. Other than questionable documents submitted by the applicant, there is no documentation that the applicant was ever commissioned or served as a commissioned officer in either the Regular Army, the Reserve, or the National Guard.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020810

    Original file (20140020810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he would like item 26 of his DD Form 214 to list the Army Good Conduct Medal and any awards for the Torrijos-Carter conflict. There is no evidence of record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was deployed to Panama.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065542C070421

    Original file (2001065542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion to major but that the computer at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) does not show that he has completed the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, so he has not been considered for promotion. On 8 January 1986, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) responded to a request from the applicant, case number AC 85-00251, to correct his commissioning as a USAR officer from 23 August 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088498C070403

    Original file (2003088498C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1978, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve. Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, it requires 7 years time in grade (TIG) as a CPT to be considered for mandatory promotion to MAJ or a minimum of 4 years TIG to be eligible for consideration for a unit vacancy promotion. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002476

    Original file (20140002476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her service as a Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadet be credited for retirement pay purposes. She respectfully requests this information be favorably considered even after the extended length of time and her service record (DD Form 214) be corrected to accurately reflect her Reserve service from 7 September 1976 through 22 December 1978. DOD Financial Management Regulations show the above time is not creditable service; therefore, she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088774C070403

    Original file (2003088774C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides three Leave and Earnings Statements (LESs); Orders 4-1 dated 13 May 1983; an email from Mr. Ron G___; appointment orders dated 14 May 1983; his oath of office dated 14 May 1983; his enlistment agreement dated 1 September 1977; his Army Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) contract dated 1 September 1977; and a DA Form 1506 dated 28 February 2003. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076730C070215

    Original file (2002076730C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show that:The applicant entered the ROTC program on 5 September 1974. The record contains no evidence that the applicant served with a Reserve unit while participating in the ROTC program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091252C070212

    Original file (2003091252C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009020C070206

    Original file (20050009020C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further shows that she was credited with zero points for the period 27 August 1984 through 8 May 1987. It further shows that she was credited with zero points for the period 27 August 1984 through 8 May 1987. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was credited with 73 retirement points during the period 2 December 1983 through 26 August 1984 and had completed 8 months and 25 days of service, which was a partial qualifying year for retirement purposes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076143C070215

    Original file (2002076143C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant's Report of Separation and Record of Service, NGB Form 22, shows he was discharged from the ARARNG (but not as a Reserve of the Army) on 28 May 1979 by reason of being ordered to involuntary active duty. Counsel stated that it was the applicant's understanding that he was discharged from military service and that he was completely unaware of being placed on active duty.