Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077925C070215
Original file (2002077925C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 26 November 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077925

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that while serving as a clerk typist during World War II he sustained an injury to his left heel. He contends that on or about
18 December 1944 a bomb exploded breaking glass in a school where he was assigned and his left heel became infected from the glass. In support of his application, he submits a letter of explanation, dated 25 July 2002; and a newspaper article titled “VA office is place to start a Purple Heart inquiry.”

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were destroyed or lost during the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Records available to the Board were obtained from alternate sources and show that the applicant was inducted on 10 January 1944. He served as a clerk typist in the European Theater of Operations from 22 July 1944 through 26 February 1946 and was honorably discharged on 13 March 1946.

The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation), which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. Item 34 (Wounds Receive in Action) on his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the entry, “NONE.”

There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II.

There are no medical records in the available records.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he was injured during World War II when a bomb exploded and shattered glass in his area.

2. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.

3. The applicant signed his discharge document on 13 March 1946 attesting to the fact that he was not wounded in action and was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

4. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

SAC___ RWA____ HOF_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077925
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20021126
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010300

    Original file (20060010300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following in support of this application: a. his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge); b. his Honorable Discharge Certificate; c. a letter, dated 20 January 2006, from a State Representative from the House of Representatives of the State of South Carolina; d. a letter, dated 20 January 2006, from the applicant to a State Representative from the House of Representatives of the State of South Carolina; e. an undated,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088533C070403

    Original file (2003088533C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004168

    Original file (20090004168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He feels that the injury to his knee was a direct result of hostile action which should entitle him to the Purple Heart. However, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the Purple Heart in this case. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061181C070421

    Original file (2001061181C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, the file contains an Authorization for Issuance of Awards (DA Form 1577), dated 13 December 1996, issued by the Department of the Army, Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, which confirms the Army authorized and issued the following awards to the applicant: Bronze Star Medal, Presidential Unit Citation; American Campaign Medal; European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with 2 bronze service stars, World War II Victory Medal, and Expert Infantryman Badge. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006979

    Original file (20080006979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. However, the two entries for 26 December 1944 and 26 February 1945 do not identify the applicant by name as being wounded in action on these dates. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to verify he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077930C070215

    Original file (2002077930C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to substantiate his contention that he was wounded in action. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show he served in China.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062239C070421

    Original file (2001062239C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows he was injured or wounded due to hostile action during World...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008591

    Original file (20120008591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a WD AGO Form 53-55, medical progress notes, two hospital admission documents, and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Progress Notes. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base awarding the FSM the second and third awards of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 25 July 1944; b. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057802C070420

    Original file (2001057802C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. However, there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003060

    Original file (20090003060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the Purple Heart in this case. However, chronicles of events, which were prepared and/or are submitted more than 50 years after the fact, do not by themselves conclusively prove the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or...