Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077527C070215
Original file (2002077527C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
                                   
        

         BOARD DATE: 8 April 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077527


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member
Ms. Linda M. Barker Member

         The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records:

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to major be corrected to 14 August 1998.

3. The applicant states that he was considered and selected for promotion to major by the 1998 Reserve Components Major Army Promotion List board effective 31 August 1998. He states that he meets the requirements to be promoted on 14 August 1998 based on his DOR for captain and his promotion eligibility date (PED) for major. He notes that he had been serving in a major’s position since 2 September 1997.

4. The applicant’s military record shows that he accepted his Reserve second lieutenant’s commission on 13 June 1986. He was promoted to first lieutenant on 27 May 1989, and to captain on 15 August 1991.

5. A 24 September 1998 memorandum from the US Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, notified the applicant that he had been selected for and promoted to major effective 31 August 1998.

6. The applicant provided an extract of Army Regulation 135-155, (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), effective 1 September 1994. Paragraph 4-15 (Promotion eligibility date and date of rank) is highlighted. This paragraph states that the promotion eligibility date is the date that an officer meets the eligibility criteria for promotion to the next higher grade. Further, date of rank is defined as the date the member actually or constructively was appointed to a specific grade and it is the date used to determine the relative seniority for officers holding the same grade. This paragraph concludes with the statement that the officer’s promotion eligibility date will become the officer’s date of rank upon promotion and the date of rank will be used to establish the promotion eligibility date to the next higher grade.

7. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was provided by the Chief of Special Actions, Office of Reserve Components Promotions. The Chief indicated that the applicant had been in a higher grade position on his PED therefore, recommended that his DOR be corrected to 14 August 1998.

8. Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes policy and procedures used in the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the commissioned and warrant officers of the U.S. Army Reserve. Table 2-1 of this regulation outlines the service requirements for promotion and indicates that the maximum years of service required in the lower grade for promotion to major is seven years and to lieutenant colonel is seven years.

9. Title 10, United States Code, Section 14308 (c) (2) states: “Except as specifically authorized by law, a reserve officer is not entitled to additional pay or allowances if the effective date of the officer’s promotion is adjusted to reflect a date earlier than the actual date of the officer’s promotion.”

10. Section III (Dates of Promotion) of Army Regulation 135-155 provides the procedures for computing promotion effective dates of all reserve component officers. It states, in pertinent part, that, unless otherwise entitled by law, antedating of either the effective date of promotion or the promotion eligibility date will not entitle a reserve component officer to increased pay and allowances. However, it does establish that the promotion eligibility date and date of rank is the date the officer meets the eligibility criteria for promotion to the next higher grade. Further, it states that an officer’s promotion eligibility date will become his date of rank upon promotion and this date will be used to establish the relative seniority for officer’s holding the same rank. Finally, it states that date of rank will be used to establish the officer’s promotion eligibility date to the next higher grade.

11. Title 10, United States Code, Section 14304 provides the legal authority for eligibility for consideration for promotion based on maximum years of service in grade provisions of the law. Subsection (a) states, in pertinent part, that officers shall be placed in the promotion zone and shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title, far enough in advance of completing the maximum years of service in grade so that, if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer will complete those years of service. The table in subsection (a) establishes the maximum years of service in grade for a captain to be promoted to major as seven years and for a major to be promoted to lieutenant colonel as seven years.

12. Subsection (b) of Title 10 United States Code, Section 14304 states: “An officer holding a permanent grade specified in the table in subsection (a) who is recommended for promotion to the next higher grade by a selection board the first time the officer is considered for promotion while in or above the promotion zone and who is placed on an approved promotion list established under section 14308(a) of this title shall (if not promoted sooner or removed from that list by the President or by reason of declination) be promoted without regard to the existence of a vacancy, on the date which the officer completes maximum years of service in grade specified in subsection (a).

13. Title 10, United States Code, Section 12203 (a) states: “Appointments of reserve officers in commissioned grades of lieutenant colonel and commander or below, except commissioned warrant officer, shall be made by the President alone.” Subsequently, in a 22 April 1997 legal opinion on effective dates of promotion for reserve officers under the Reserve Officers Personnel Management Act, the Chief of the Military Personnel Law Branch, Office of the Judge Advocate General, opined that the effective date of promotion of reserve component officers may not predate the approval of the promotion board results by the President.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant’s promotion eligibility date to major was 14 August 1998 based on seven years from the date he was promoted to captain.

2. The applicant was selected for advancement to major by the 1998 Reserve Component, Major, Army Promotion List, Promotion Selection Board; with the President approving the board results on 31 August 1998.

3. The applicant’s promotion was announced on 24 September 1998 with promotion, pay and allowances, and time in grade for promotion to the next grade effective 31 August 1998, the same date the President approved the promotion selection board results.

4. The Board finds that the law provides that a reserve component officer who is selected for promotion to major, if not promoted sooner, will be promoted not later than the date he or she reaches the maximum years of service in grade, seven years as a captain. Therefore, the Board concurs with the advisory opinion that the applicant is entitled to adjustment of his date of rank to major. Further, the Board has determined, based on law and regulation currently in effect, that the applicant’s date of rank is 14 August 1998 and that this same date is also the starting date for determining the applicant’s promotion eligibility date to lieutenant colonel.

5. Based on adjustment of the applicant’s date of rank to 14 August 1998, the Board has determined, based on law and regulation currently in effect, that the applicant’s promotion eligibility date to lieutenant colonel is 13 August 2005.

6. However, the Board finds that the actual date of the applicant’s promotion may not precede 31 August 1998, which is the date on which the President approved the 1998 Reserve Component, Major, Army Promotion List, Promotion Selection Board results. Further, law and regulation provide that antedating of either the effective date of promotion or the promotion eligibility date will not entitle a reserve component officer to increased pay and allowances. Therefore, the applicant’s actual promotion date cannot be adjusted to any date prior to 31 August 1998 and he cannot be paid any back pay and allowances.

7. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.



RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the date of rank of the individual concerned is 14 August 1998 and that his promotion eligibility date to lieutenant colonel is 13 August 2005.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

_RJW___ __BJE___ __LMB__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _Raymond J. Wagner___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077527
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030408
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 102.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091316C070212

    Original file (03091316C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion recommended his record be corrected accordingly and noted that as a result of the adjustment to his date of rank he would be eligible for consideration by the 2003 lieutenant colonel promotion selection board. The applicant was selected for promotion to major by the 1998 Reserve Components Promotion Selection Board; however, the President did not approve the board results until 31 August 1998. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078301C070215

    Original file (2002078301C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) under the United States Code, Title 10, Section 14304 requires that an officer recommended for promotion by a selection board the first time the officer is considered for promotion while in or above the promotion zone and who is placed on an approved promotion list be promoted not later than their maximum time in grade for their present grade. The opinion points out that the applicant was considered for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005904C070208

    Original file (20040005904C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that the applicant was recommended for promotion by the 1998 RCSB for promotion to lieutenant colonel. There is no evidence that the applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel or served in the rank of lieutenant colonel during the period from 22 July 1999 until he was promoted to lieutenant colonel on 17 June 2004. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application as requests correction of his promotion date to 22 July 1999 and correction of his OERs for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059931C070421

    Original file (2001059931C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion notification letter to major shows that his effective date of promotion to major is 3 January 2000. Based on the Reserve Officers Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), the effective date of promotion for an officer cannot be prior to the date the President of the United States approves the promotion board results. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061083C070421

    Original file (2001061083C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the Reserve Officers Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), the effective date of promotion for an officer cannot be prior to the date the President of the United States approves the promotion board results. The opinion also states that the applicant had been in a major’s position since 3 January 1999 and that the applicant was issued a promotion memorandum on 14 January 2000 showing his date of rank as 3 January 2000. Under ROPMA, the MYIG for a Reserve captain in order to be eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009116

    Original file (20060009116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He indicates that this error has since been corrected and asks that the effective date of promotion be corrected to 30 August 2005, the date he reached his maximum years in grade (MYIG) requirement for promotion LTC, or 30 December 2005, the date the fiscal year 2005 LTC promotion board was approved. Title 10, United States Code, Section 12203 (a) states: “Appointments of Reserve officers in commissioned grades of lieutenant colonel and commander or below, except commissioned warrant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104037C070208

    Original file (2004104037C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that applicant's promotion eligibility date for lieutenant based on 7 years time in grade as a major is 22 February 2000. Records show that the applicant was recommended for promotion by the 1999 RCSB for promotion to lieutenant colonel. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 1. showing that the applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel with an effective date of 22 February 2000; 2. amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067143C070402

    Original file (2002067143C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (LTC) as 1 April 2000. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officer and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) states in paragraph 3-19a that officers and warrant officers who have either failed selection for promotion or who were erroneously not considered for promotion through administrative error may be reconsidered for promotion by either a promotion advisory board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011322

    Original file (20060011322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum, dated 10 February 2005, shows the applicant was promoted to major effective 10 February 2005. Evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to major in August 2001 with a PED of 18 July 2000. In a memorandum, dated 10 February 2005, the promotion policy was changed to provide for the promotion of an officer recommended for promotion by a mandatory promotion board when he/she attains the maximum time in grade required.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005724C070206

    Original file (20050005724C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of rank to lieutenant colonel (LTC) as 16 February 2002. The applicant provided a self-authored letter in which he stated that he requested approval to go before the 2005 United States Army Reserve Colonel Promotion Board. The advisory opinion further stated that the fact that the applicant remained with his unit to fulfill duties and ensure a smooth transition for the incoming commander kept the applicant in a major...