| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Ms. Linda M. Barker | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 67A1F (General Aircraft Repairer) He also requests that he be awarded the Air Medal (AM).
3. The applicant states he served two tours in Vietnam. He was awarded MOS 67A1F in 1970 during his first tour after performing the duties of a door gunner on a UH-1 helicopter in combat after the initial door gunner was shot. In support of his application, he submits SF Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) covering the period from 27 June 1970 to 20 July 1970.
4. The applicant's military records are presumed lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein is limited and was obtained from alternate sources.
5. The available evidence indicates that the applicant served in the Regular Army from 14 August 1969 until he was honorably separated on 26 May 1971 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. His DD Form 214 shows: that he held MOS 36K20 (Field Switchboard Operator/Wireman); that he served in Vietnam from 15 June 1970 to 30 November 1970; and that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device.
6. All entries on the SF Form 600 provided by the applicant were made at the Aviation Dispensary, 93rd Medical Detachment, in Vietnam. On 29 June 1970, the applicant received, and passed, a "Door Gunner's Physical." Although he was found to be "DG (door gunner) qualified," the physician added that "I have some reservations because of N-P (neuro-psychiatric) hx (history) -- will follow closely."
7. On 10 July 1970, the applicant was seen at the Aviation Dispensary because he "passed out [for a few minutes] while flying yesterday." On 17 July 1970, the applicant was again seen at the dispensary after complaining of dizziness. The last entry on the SF 600 is dated 20 July 1970 and states "Pt (patient) to see M.D. Back again. 'Can't take it anymore. Wants to see psychiatrist re: 212 (Army Regulation 635-212 separation for unfitness/unsuitability) discharge."
8. There is no evidence available to indicate the applicant was ever awarded MOS 67A1F with a special qualification identifier (SQI) of "F" to indicate he was in flying status, nor is there any evidence available to indicate that he ever served in this MOS.
9. Item 30 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he served in Vietnam from 15 June 1970-30 November 1970. Therefore, his campaigns include the DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive, and the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII.
10. On 6 August 1984, the Reserve Components Personnel & Administration Center (RCPAC), St. Louis, Missouri issued the applicant the medals listed on his DD Form 214, as well as the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and two bronze service stars (BSS's) to be worn on the VSM. The applicant's record does not contain a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show award of the GCMDL and the BSS's.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight. This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
12. U.S Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, guidelines for award of the Air Medal (AM) during the Vietnam War. It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations. It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours. Twenty-five Category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in Category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the Air Medal. However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point. Nothing created an entitlement to the award. There was no provision for making the award simply because an aircraft was struck by enemy fire.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant may have received a "door gunner's physical;" however, this does not prove that he performed the duties of a door gunner while serving in combat for the requisite number of flight hours required to award the AM.
2. Award of the AM requires a formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders. The applicant has not presented any definitive evidence, and the available record does not contain any evidence, to show that he was ever recommended and approved for award of the AM, or that orders were ever issued awarding the medal.
3. There is also no evidence available to support the applicant's contention that he was awarded MOS 67A1F.
4. The available evidence supports that the applicant served honorably and was awarded the GCMDL by RCPAC. Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 changed to show award of the GCMDL for his period of honorable service from 14 August 1969-26 May 1971.
5. The RCPAC also authorized the applicant two BSS's for his VSM. Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 changed to show award of two BSS's for wear on his VSM.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected, but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected and that the individual concerned be provided a DD Form 215 to show award of the GCMDL and two BSS's for his VSM.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__rjw___ __bje___ __lmb___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond J. Wagner
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002077466 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030408 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.0000 |
| 2. | 107.0056 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010577
The applicant requests that he be awarded the appropriate number of Air Medals and that his secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS) of 67A1F be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant has not provided and his records do not contain orders awarding him the MOS of 67A1F. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Air Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010447C070208
A review of the applicant’s flight records shows that his first award of the AM was awarded after completion of 35 flight hours. A computation of the applicant’s total combat flight hours (918) indicates that he should have received awards of the AM through the twenty-sixth award (AM with Numeral 26) up through 3 July 1971, the date of his last recorded flight. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his records to show entitlement to the AM w/Numeral “26” for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007225C080407
Chester A. Damian | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he requests to be awarded the AM and ACB based on the over 500 hours of combat aerial flight missions he participated in during the period 28 April through 4 September 1971, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012855
During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of or was caused by enemy action, that it required treatment by military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072105C070403
In support of his application, he submitted orders for the first award of the Air Medal, a 7 December 1971 recommendation for award of the Air Medal with 23 Oak Leaf Clusters, orders for award of the Bronze Star Medal and 27 December 1972 letter orders awarding him MOS 67N2F. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows award of the Air Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster). The Board reviewed the governing regulations for award of the Air...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017801
The date of this MOS is not recorded on the form; b. he was assigned duty in Vietnam and served as follows: (1) in the duty MOS of 43E2P, Parachute Packer Assistant, with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 266th Supply and Service Battalion from 5 December 1969 through 10 December 1969; (2) in the duty MOS of 43E2P, Air Drop Support Specialist, with the 383rd Quartermaster Detachment from 11 December 1969 through 22 January 1971; (3) in the duty MOS of 43E2P, Rigger, with the 228th...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002167
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002167 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his originally submitted request, with all enclosures, and as new evidence, a self-authored letter outlining his request for reconsideration of his case; a letter to the Board from a retired former service member who is familiar with the applicant and his service in Vietnam; and a statement from an individual who identified...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051262C070420
Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. There also is no evidence to show that he was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal. The Board notes that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013714
The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show 15 additional awards of the AM (i.e., the AM with Numeral 16) because he accrued 763 hours of combat assault or combat support flight time. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded more than one AM. e. However, based on the evidence of record (i.e., certification by the operations officer that the applicant accrued 453 flight hours) and the conclusion they were category III...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029121
His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Air Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and his marksmanship badges. Accordingly, this unit award should be added to his records at this time as well. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...