| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | ||
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the rank listed in his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected to read sergeant (SGT).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to SGT on 25 October 1945, however, his separation document lists his rank as corporal (CPL). He believes because he was only promoted two weeks prior to his discharge, his promotion was not recorded in his separation document. In support of his application, he provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55, a copy of a Separation Qualification Record (WD AGO 100), and promotion orders to SGT.
4. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost in that fire.
5. The available evidence also includes a copy of Special Orders Number 143, dated 25 October 1945, issued by Headquarters, 71st Infantry, Camp Chaffee, Arkansas. These orders include the applicant’s name and show he was appointed to SGT in paragraph 11 (Temporary Appointments).
6. The available evidence also includes a Separation Qualification Record that was prepared on the applicant during his separation processing. This
WD AGO Form 100, shows that the military occupational specialties (MOS) and assignments the applicant served in, which includes 3 months as a private in basic training, and 30 months as a SGT in MOS 610 (Anti-Tank Gunner).
7. The WD AGO 53-55 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation,
10 November 1945, lists his rank in Item 3 (Grade) as CPL. This document also shows that the applicant served in the European Theater of Operations (ETO) for a little over 10 months, and that he earned the European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars, Good Conduct Medal, American Theater Ribbon, Combat Infantryman Badge, and World War II Victory Medal.
8. Technical Manual 12-235, which prescribed the policy and procedure for the preparation and distribution of separation documents during the period in question, and contained item by item entry instructions. The guidance for
Item 3 (Grade) stated the grade held on the date of separation would be entered in this item.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the rank entered in his separation document should be corrected to read SGT, and it finds this claim has merit.
2. The available evidence includes a Separation Qualification Record that confirms that the applicant served in a SGT position for 30 months and promotion orders that confirm he was appointed to the rank of SGT on 25 October 1945, a few weeks prior to his separation on 10 November 1945. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his separation document to reflect this rank and date of appointment.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the 10 November 1945 separation document of the individual concerned to change the entry in Item 3 (Grade) to read SGT; and by issuing the individual concerned a corrected separation document that reflects this change.
BOARD VOTE:
_ _SAC _ __RWA_ ___HOF__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Samuel A. Crumpler _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002077451 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/11/26 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1945/11/10 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-365 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Demobilization |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 310 | 131.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024052
Counsel states the applicant was promoted to SGT according to records from the Provost Marshal General's Office and other documentation that are included with his application. Evidence shows the applicant's discharge document does not contain this entry. The Board requests that the ARBA, CMD Promulgation provide administrative relief by adding to Item 55 (Remarks) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 "PRISONER OF WAR, Company E, 12th Infantry, 20 December 1944 to June 1945" and providing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017339
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) to show the rank of corporal (CPL) instead of the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he held the rank of PFC at the time of separation and the highest rank he held while on active duty was CPL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006899
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 3 (Grade) of the applicants WD AGO Form 53-55 contains the entry CPL-16 May 1946, which indicates he was promoted to the rank of corporal on 16 May 1946. There is no indication in the available documents on file in the applicant's reconstructed record that shows he was ever recommended for promotion by his parent unit commander, or promoted to the rank of SGT during his tenure on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018494
The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In effect, his signature was his verification that the information on the WD AGO Form 53, to include the grade and highest grade held entries, was correct at the time the separation document was prepared and issued. The passes and identification cards provided by the applicant, while indicating he was a SGT, were locally issued documents,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066721C070402
The applicant states, in effect, that the highest rank the FSM held during his active duty tenure was SGT. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the highest grade the FSM held on active duty was SGT and it carefully considered the documents submitted by the applicant to support her claim. During the processing of this case, the Board did find that the FSM was awarded the BSM based on having earned the CIB during World War II.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090052C070212
The applicant provides, in support of his application, an undated newspaper article which announces his status as a POW; a self-authored letter, dated 20 May 1995; two Department of the Army Memorandums, dated 12 September 1996 and 17 October 1996, respectively; a letter addressed to a retired Army Colonel, dated 8 December 2001; an undated newspaper clipping which announces his advancement to the grade of SGT; a notice of change of address (WD AGO 204) with an undecipherable date; an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003398C071029
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. The available evidence also includes a WD Form 372B and although this document contained a lined through SGT entry, it confirms the applicant’s final pay was based on his rank of CPL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018401
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect sergeant (SGT/E-5) as the highest grade held based on his battlefield promotion and back pay associated with that promotion. Therefore, the Board requests that the ARBA CMD administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to add the following entries his WD AGO 53-55: * Prisoner of War Medal in item 33 * the entry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015260
The applicant states that he was discharged on 11 October 1945 but his promotion to sergeant was a few months later. The letter stated, in pertinent part, that he was promoted to sergeant based on his status as a POW, that his records were amended to show his grade at discharge was sergeant, and that any correspondence pertaining to an adjustment in pay due to this promotion in grade should be directed to the Army Service Forces, Office of the Fiscal Director, Central Field Fiscal Office,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011800
The applicant states, in effect, his discharge document shows his rank as corporal (CPL) and he was promoted to SGT during a field commission. The available evidence shows the highest rank the applicant satisfactorily held was the rank of CPL. There is no evidence in the available record and none was provided by the applicant to show he was promoted to SGT during a field promotion prior to 4 June 1946 (his date of separation).