| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. James E. Anderholm | Member | ||
| Ms. Charmane Collins | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, at the time he was drafted and the concept of him being needed by his country to achieve freedom for Vietnam was a good thought. He comments that he felt proud to be around a large group of people since coming from a small town and a dysfunctional upbringing. He states that his performance in basic training at Fort Lewis, Washington was excellent and he qualified expert on the rifle range. Prior to the draft he attended the upward bound program where he met his first love and they were together for three years before they attended college. He states that on his first pass to see his first love he lost track of time, which resulted in his being absent without leave (AWOL) and being picked up by the military police, which embarrassed him. His second visitation to his first love was to end the relationship, which he could not do and he again overstayed and was AWOL. He claims that his stupidity and immaturity did not allow him to consider the consequences of his actions. He was again picked up by the military police, and this time placed in confinement. At that time, after requesting to see his company commander without success, he was given and signed his discharge papers. He contends that he has always felt regret and remorse for being discharged from the Army. He claims that he is now a responsible husband and adult and is not the confused young man who had to grow and learn many lessons. He feels that if he had been allowed to stay in the Army, he would have serve honorably. He now requests that his discharge be upgraded. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214) and eight letters of support.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 6 April 1971, the applicant was inducted into the Regular Army for 2 years. He attended basic combat training at Fort Lewis, Washington. His record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition, and it confirms that the highest rank he attained while on active duty was private/E-1.
The applicant’s discharge packet containing the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge processing is not in the record. However, there is a properly constituted separation document (DD Form 214) on file that contains the authority and reason for discharge. This document was authenticated by the applicant with his signature and it confirms that on 8 September 1971, he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time of his discharge, he had completed a total of only 4 months and 28 days of creditable active military service.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statue of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that his youth and immaturity resulted in his not understanding the consequences of his actions and that had he been allowed to remain in the Army he would have served honorably. The Board also considered his post service conduct, as attested to in the supporting letters he provided with his application. However, it finds these factors are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. The applicant’s record is void of facts and circumstances concerning events that led to a discharge from the Army. The Board notes that his record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214, which was authenticated by the applicant with his signature, and it presumes government regularity in the discharge process. This separation document confirms that he was discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial.
3. Procedurally, this would have required him to consult with legal counsel after being charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. In addition, he would have had to voluntarily request separation after admitting guilt to the stipulated offense under the UCMJ. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ FNE _ __JEA___ ___CC__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002077085 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/12/03 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19710908 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200 . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | In lieu of Trail by CM |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.7000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054289C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board also noted that he was almost 19 years old when he went AWOL and found no evidence that he was any less mature than other 19-year old soldiers who successfully completed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100523C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military personnel records show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 June 1970 for a period of 2 years and was assigned to Fort Jackson, South Carolina for basic combat training (BCT). Accordingly, on 21 June 1971, the applicant was discharged with a UD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003700
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant stated he was drafted prior to his 26th birthday and he spent 5 years in the Merchant Marines and 3 years in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059591C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. When he returned to Fort Lewis, WA he was told he would be returned to Vietnam. On 17 March 1983, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003959C070205
Stone | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has failed to provide evidence showing that he was improperly advised, or denied the training he enlisted for. The applicant’s separation document confirms he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014452
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge. Also in his request, the FSM understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he would normally be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records may elect to change the punishment and/or the characterization of service if...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005564
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to an honorable or a general discharge. On 23 January 1978, having been advised by legal counsel, he submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000079C070205
He goes on to state that he served his tour of duty in Vietnam and was honorably discharged. He further states that his two tours in Vietnam, along with the Presidential Pardon he obtained and his subsequently successful civilian employment should justify an upgrade of his discharge. Accordingly, the Board determined that the applicant should be excused for failing to timely file for the upgrade of his discharge and to grant him an honorable discharge based on clemency.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073864C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that if he received a discharge at the present time it would have been an honorable or medical discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072744C070403
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he did not receive his orders for reassignment to his next duty station. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 30 April 1971, the applicant was discharged accordingly.