| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Sherri V. Ward | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was wounded by hostile action in Vietnam and treated by a medic. In support of his application, he submits numerous copies of his Army medical records.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: The American Legion, as counsel for the applicant, points out that the applicant had two tours of duty in Vietnam and has indicated that he was wounded. Counsel recommends that the applicant be asked to provide additional information to substantiate his claim.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant entered active duty on 31 July 1967. He served as a cannon crewman in Vietnam from 4 February 1968 through 4 February 1969 and from
6 February 1971 through 31 December 1971. He also served in Korea, Turkey and Germany (two tours). On 7 July 1983, the applicant was permanently retired in the rank of staff sergeant by reason of physical disability.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 15 October 1969 and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an effective date of 7 July 1983 do not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action.
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
Evidence of record shows that in November 1969 the applicant underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any wounds sustained as result of hostile action.
In support of his application, the applicant provided copies of medical records from June 1967 to June 1983. These medical records fail to show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
Army Regulation 15-185 governs operations of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he was wounded by hostile action in Vietnam and treated by a medic.
2. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
3. The Board considered the numerous medical records provided in support of the applicant’s claim for award of the Purple Heart. However, these medical records fail to show that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
4. The applicant signed his discharge documents attesting that he was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.
5. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
6. The Board noted counsel’s contention that the applicant should be asked to provide additional information to substantiate his claim for award of the Purple Heart. However, in accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the ABCMR will decide cases on the evidence of record. It is not an investigative body.
7. The Board also notes that, in accordance with the governing regulation, the ABCMR may, in its discretion, request additional evidence. However, the Board determined that there is no basis to request additional evidence at this time.
8. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
9. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JNS____ SVW____ MHM_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002076935 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021119 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058210C070421
The applicant provided a copy of a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 3 November 1969, which shows the entry “Frag [fragment] wound to chest” in item 39 (Physician’s Summary and Elaboration of all Pertinent Data). There is no evidence of record available to the Board which shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action in Vietnam. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003558
Department of the Army Letter Orders, dated 7 September 1972, show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 30 March 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. Evidence of records shows that, on/about 11 July 1967, the applicant suffered metal shrapnel in his eyes in the Republic of Vietnam, while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action and is therefore entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069699C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019934
However, there is no available evidence that shows the applicant was wounded while in combat. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records which show he was awarded the Purple Heart. However, in the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and an official medical record showing he was treated for such a wound, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072643C070403
The Board also noted that the applicant authenticated his discharge document which shows that he was not awarded the Purple Heart. Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting award of the Purple Heart in this case. The applicant’s DD Form 214, with a separation date of 14 June 1983, shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778
The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071906C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained during his service in Vietnam. Furthermore, in the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019396
There are no orders in his military records awarding him the Purple Heart, and there is no evidence anywhere in his military records which shows that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence provided by the applicant was carefully considered; however, in order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. While the applicant provided...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060678C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072243C070403
These awards are not shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 and will be administratively corrected.Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, in the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action, the Board determined that this medical report is not sufficient as a basis for award of the...