Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076655C070215
Original file (2002076655C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 7 November 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002076655

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:


         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased fiancé, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) to child only coverage.

APPLICANT STATES: That their daughter was born ten weeks premature in March 2002. They were waiting for her birth certificate to arrive so he could show proof of birth but it did not arrive until after he died. She provides the FSM's death certificate and their child's birth certificate as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:

That he was born on 8 December 1942. After having had prior service, he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 25 March 1983. His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 14 June 2000. At that time he was not married and he enrolled in the RCSBP for insurable interest coverage (an adult daughter), full base amount, option C.

The FSM's and the applicant's daughter was born on 22 March 2002. The FSM died on 20 April 2002. The birth certificate was issued on 26 April 2002.

Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If the member dies before reaching age 60, the premiums are deducted from the annuity.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married or has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP. Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.


Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(1) provides that a person who is not married or has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP may elect to provide an annuity to a natural person with an insurable interest in that person. Such an election for a beneficiary who is not the former spouse of the person providing the annuity may be terminated.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Retirements and Annuities section, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command. That office recommended approval of the applicant's request, noting that the law is clear -- the FSM made an election to cover his grown daughter as an insurable interest. He could change that designation at any time.

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment. She concurred in the advisory opinion, stating that she and the FSM had been in a long and loving relationship.

On 1 October 2002, the applicant was requested to obtain the FSM's adult daughter's concurrence with her request. She did not respond within the time frame given.

On 6 November 2002, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service determined that a claim for the RCSBP annuity has not been submitted.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. The Board is sympathetic with the applicant's desire to provide for the FSM's infant daughter. However, given the facts of this case the lawful beneficiary of the FSM’s RCSBP is the FSM's adult daughter even though it appears she is not currently drawing the annuity. Absent a statement from the FSM’s adult daughter asserting that she agrees to renounce payment of the RCSBP annuity in perpetuity in favor of the applicant's daughter and notwithstanding the advisory opinion, the Board will not take any action to prevent the lawful beneficiary from receiving those benefits. To do so would constitute an unconstitutional taking without due process of law.

2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO__ __TBR _ __DPH __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002076655
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/11/07
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008509

    Original file (20130008509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; or * elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60 Once a member elects either option B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010677

    Original file (20140010677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 letter, prepared on 9 July 1996, wherein the FSM was notified of completion of the required years of service and eligibility for retired pay upon application. There is no evidence of record that the FSM elected to change his SBP coverage by adding spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of his marriage to the applicant (7 December 1999). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003512

    Original file (20120003512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003512 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005632C070206

    Original file (20050005632C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 October 1999, the FSM elected to terminate his participation in the SBP. The applicant's daughter is listed as the annuitant on DFAS's 17 February 2005 letter to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM did not request termination of his SBP in October 1999 but continued to remain enrolled in the SBP for child-only coverage; b. collecting any SBP costs due; and c. paying to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003668

    Original file (20150003668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on this decision, the election of the applicant's daughter as his beneficiary on the DD Form 1883 was invalid. n. The Board in the in paragraph 4 of the "Discussion and Conclusions" area of the cited case, states: "The evidence of the record fails to show that the U.S. Army required the applicant to provide proof that the child listed on the DD Form 1883 was eligible for the RCSBP based upon being enrolled in full -time education, as required by the applicable regulatory guidance." 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006196C070205

    Original file (20060006196C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when her husband was notified in 1991 of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, he was single and listed his sister as the person to receive his RCSBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 (Application of Plan), provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the Plan. However,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005016

    Original file (20130005016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the brother of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his brother's record to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for child coverage for his daughter. The applicant provides: * a timeline of events related to the FSM's SBP election * the FSM's 20-Year Letter * 3 death certificates for the FSM and each of his parents * the FSM's daughter's birth certificate * Court-issued paternity documents for the FSM's daughter * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088023C070403

    Original file (2003088023C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse and children coverage, full base amount, option C and applied for retired pay. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. a. showing that the FSM applied for retired pay by completing a DD Form 2656 on 1 July 1998...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007559

    Original file (20120007559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant stated: * She had enclosed the necessary documentation DFAS requested regarding the FSM's death * She had been informed the last retirement payment would be made via direct deposit, and further payments would be terminated due to the FSM's death * She understood she was not entitled to compensation regarding his retirement pay because she was not his dependent * She was designated as his natural insurable interest SBP beneficiary on his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083250C070215

    Original file (2002083250C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60 th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The evidence of record confirms that the deceased FSM elected RCSBP coverage for his mother as an insurable interest in connection with...