| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of his discharge he was informed that his discharge would be automatically upgraded 6 months after his discharge if he accepted the discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He initially enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 15 September 1978 and served in the USAR until he enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 October 1979 for a period of 4 years and assignment to Fort Stewart, Georgia. He was transferred to Fort Stewart where he remained until he was transferred to Hawaii on 4 September 1981, in the pay grade of E-4.
On 7 April 1982, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-3 and a forfeiture of pay.
The applicant was referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Program (ADARP) on 13 April 1982, as a result of his alcohol and drug abuse. On 17 May 1982, the applicant was declared a rehabilitation failure because he had not successfully curtailed his substance abuse and his duty performance was deemed to be below standards.
On 20 May 1982, NJP was again imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
On 9 June 1982, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol and drug abuse rehabilitation failure. He cited as the basis for his recommendation the applicant’s failure of the ADARP, substandard duty performance, his disciplinary record and failure to respond to extensive counseling sessions by his chain of command.
The applicant declined consultation with legal counsel and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 21 June 1982 and directed that he be furnished with a General Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 9 July 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol or other drug abuse. He had served 2 years, 8 months and 9 days of active service during his current enlistment.
There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
A review of the applicant’s records fails to show any indication that he was informed that his discharge would be upgraded 6 months after his discharge or that it was ever offered as a condition of his accepting the discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 of that regulation contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol and/or drug abuse. A member may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, or successfully complete a rehabilitation program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Characterization of service will be determined solely by the soldier’s military record that includes the soldier’s behavior and performance during the current enlistment. An honorable discharge is a separation with honor and is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. It is issued to soldiers whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. There are no automatic provisions, nor have there ever been, to automatically upgrade a discharge made under these provisions.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no evidence of any violations of the applicant’s rights. Accordingly, the characterization of his discharge appropriately characterizes his overall record of service.
3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, they are not supported by the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record. There never have been nor are there now any provisions to automatically upgrade a discharge without application from the individual concerned. Additionally, his discharge was not conditional on whether or not he agreed to be discharged under chapter 9. The decision to approve and direct discharge rested strictly with the approval authority.
4. The applicant had multiple incidents of misconduct involving alcohol abuse and the Board finds that such misconduct does not constitute fully honorable service, given the efforts by the chain of command to rehabilitate him and his failure to contribute to those efforts.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__mm___ ___rjw __ ___clg___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002076645 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/02/04 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1982/07/09 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, CH9 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | ALCOHOL REHAB FAILURE |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 680 | 144.6900/A69.00 ALCOHOL REHAB FAIL |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078576C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 August 1983, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, due to his drug abuse rehabilitative failure. Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 15 September 1983, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, due to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068372C070402
On 19 April 1979, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for possession of marijuana. Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 8 June 1983, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure. There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002801C070205
The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 18 December 1982, he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve, under the Delayed Entry Program, for 6 years, in the pay grade of E-1. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080923C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 30 January 1974 and on 25 February 1974, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on the expiration of his term of service (ETS). There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004460C070205
The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable and that the narrative reason for separation, separation authority, separation code and reenlistment code be removed from his report of separation (DD Form 214). Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 17 October 1986, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol abuse – rehabilitation failure. There is no indication in the available records to show that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083526C070212
The applicant's commander recommended he be discharged from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. On 18 August 1983, the applicant was discharged, with a general discharge under honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082576C070215
The commanding officer stated that the applicant indicated a desire to be separated from the Army at the earliest opportunity and that he was in the process of being discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, based on alcohol or other drug abuse. Although the applicant's commander directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate, his recommendation for discharge was motivated by the applicant’s conduct related to alcohol or drug abuse. However, he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087836C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 25 October 1985, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075739C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In support of his application he submits a copy of his certificate indicating his completion of a drug awareness program, four character references, and documents showing his attendance and completion of airborne training. It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062295C070421
The applicant submits copies of documents related to his reductions in grade which include his company commander’s 12 January 2000 recommendation for separation, part of the proceedings of his 21 November 2000 Administrative Separation Board, a summary of his rehabilitation appointments recorded on two appointment information sheets, two court-martial charge sheets for cocaine use, a 26 June 2000 summary of rehabilitation services, and a 30 November 2000 letter from a private substance abuse...