| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Member | |
| Mr. James E. Anderholm | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DA Form 2627, Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ, be removed from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
APPLICANT STATES: He made a foolish mistake when he was a young soldier, and accepts full responsibility for his actions. He has been successfully rehabilitated and has gone on to be a very productive and outstanding soldier. He believes that it is essential that soldiers who falter, but have the potential to serve honorably and well, be given every opportunity to succeed.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 October 1982.
On 1 August 1985 the applicant, an enlisted soldier in pay grade E-4, accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, UCMJ, for wrongfully using marijuana. His punishment consisted of a reduction from pay grade E-4 to E-2 (suspended), forfeiture of $347.00 a month for two months, and 45 days of extra duty. The commander imposing the NJP directed that the proceedings be filed in the restricted portion of the applicant’s OMPF.
The applicant served in the military occupational specialties of personnel senior sergeant and administrative specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-8. He has successfully completed a host of service schools, and has been awarded numerous awards and decorations, including the Bronze Star Medal, two Meritorious Service Medals, and three Army Commendation Medals. At the time the applicant submitted his request he was serving on active duty as a First Sergeant.
Army Regulation 27-10 provides policy for the administration of military justice. Chapter 3 provides that NJP is appropriate in all cases involving minor offenses in which non-punitive measures are considered inadequate or inappropriate. It is a tool available to commanders to correct, educate and reform offenders whom the commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures; to preserve a member's record of service from unnecessary stigma by record of court-martial conviction; and to further military efficiency by disposing of minor offenses in a manner requiring fewer resources than trial by court-martial. It also provided that the officer imposing NJP determines whether the report of NJP (DA Form 2627) is to be filed on the individual's restricted or performance fiche.
This regulation provides that an NJP may be set aside upon a determination that, under all the circumstances of the case a clear injustice has resulted. A clear injustice means that an un-waived legal or factual error has clearly and affirmatively injured the substantial rights of the soldier. New evidence unquestionably exculpating the individual is a cited example whereas the fact that a soldier's subsequent performance has been exemplary or that the punishment adversely effects the career potential is expressly excluded from the definition of clear injustice.
This regulation provides that a NJP that has been wholly set aside is to be filed on the restricted fiche of the individual's OMPF. The regulation also requires that when a soldier requests a record of NJP be transferred to the restricted fiche the request is to be accompanied by substantive evidence that the intended purpose has been served and the transfer of the record is in the best interest of the Army.
Paragraph 3-43 of this regulation, Transfer or removal of records of nonjudicial punishment, limits the authority of the Department of Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) to the transfer of NJP's from the performance portion of OMPF's to the restricted portion of OMPF's.
Army Regulation 640-10, which establishes the responsibilities, policies, and procedures for maintaining and controlling the OMPF, states, in pertinent part, that the restricted fiche is the OMPF section for historical data that may normally be improper for viewing by selection boards or career managers. The restricted fiche ensures that an unbroken, historical record of a member's service, conduct, duty performance, evaluation periods, and corrections to other parts of the OMPF is maintained. It is intended to protect the interest of the member and the Army.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The NJP was imposed in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies. The punishment imposed was neither unjust nor disproportionate to the offense, and there is no evidence of any substantive violation of any of the applicant's rights. The applicant does not contest these facts.
2. The record of NJP is properly filed in the restricted portion of the applicant’s OMPF and as such no error or injustice exists.
3. The regulation governing the filing of NJP’s is clear that for historical purposes, the Army has a vested interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The applicant accepted NJP for wrongfully using marijuana. To remove that NJP would disrupt the historical accuracy of the applicant’s military records.
4. However, the NJP is filed in the restricted portion of the applicant’s OMPF. As the name implies, access to the restricted portion of a soldiers OMPF is strictly limited. As such, it is unlikely that the applicant’s NJP will adversely affect him. His promotion to pay grade E-8, his selection for numerous service schools, and his selection to his current position of First Sergeant all reinforce this assumption.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___mhm_ ___jea___ ___jlp___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002076558 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021008 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 126.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016195
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states that he would like the Article 15 removed from his OMPF because it is over 20 years old and he received it during his first active duty tour. Given the above and the fact the Article 15 was properly filed on his OMPF, it would not be equitable to remove the Article 15 from his records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014197
The imposing commander directed this Article 15 be filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF. The evidence of record further shows that this DA Form 2627 is properly filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF as directed by the imposing commander. The applicant is currently an SFC/E-7.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003488
The applicant requests, in effect, that his record of punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 29 November 2006, be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The decision to file the original DA Form 2627 on the P-Fiche or R-Fiche of the OMPF will be made by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. It states, in pertinent part, that application for removal of an Article 15 from a Soldier's OMPF based on error or injustice...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008743C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 2627, Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ, be removed from the restricted fiche (R-fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). It states, in pertinent part, that application for removal of an Article 15 from a Soldier's OMPF based on error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012451
The imposing commander directed the filing of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF. NJP is "wholly set aside" when the commander who imposed the punishment, a successor in command, or a superior authority sets aside all punishment imposed upon an individual under Article 15. It states applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013891
Since the applicant's records shows he had previously received an NJP and it was filed in the restricted section of his OMPF, the filing location for the second NJP was changed to the performance section of his OMPF in accordance with Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice). This Army regulation also states that documents authorized for filing in the restricted section are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096507C070212
On 25 June 2003 the Commanding General, United States Army Japan/9th Theater Support Command set aside the applicant's punishment that he received under Article 15, UCMJ. Paragraph 3-6 states in effect, that the commander imposing the punishment also determines whether the record of the punishment is filed in the performance or the restricted fiche of the Soldier's OMPF. As noted above, when a record of nonjudicial punishment is filed in the restricted fiche of a Soldier's OMPF, the DA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010425C070205
Paragraph 3-37b (2) states, in pertinent part, that for Soldiers, in the rank of sergeant and above, the original of the DA Form 2627 will be sent to the appropriate custodian for filing in the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, that application for removal of an Article 15 from a Soldier's OMPF based on error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant states that the Article 15 was based on an unjust investigation; however, she...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008460
NJP is "wholly set aside" when the commander who imposed the punishment, a successor in command, or a superior authority sets aside all punishment imposed upon an individual under Article 15. It states applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides no evidence to show the DA Form 2627 was imposed in error or that it was unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015219
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceeding under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 27 August 1990, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) establishes the responsibilities, policies, and procedures for maintaining and controlling the OMPF states that the restricted portion of the OMPF is for historical data that may normally be improper for...