Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076173C070215
Original file (2002076173C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 10 October 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002076173


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that he applied for retired pay. She states that the FSM never received his retirement packet. "They" did not have a good address for him.

3. The FSM’s military records from his Army National Guard service are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

4. The FSM was born on 13 January 1942. After having had prior service, he enlisted in the Army National Guard in January 1982. His notification of eligibility for retired pay (his 20-year letter) is dated 11 December 2001. He died on 5 March 2002. He never applied for retired pay.

5. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member’s retired pay (costs for option C being more expensive). A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.

6. Public Law 106-398, enacted 30 October 2000, required written spousal consent for a Reserve service member to be able to delay making an RCSBP election until age 60. The law is applicable to cases where 20-year letters have been made after 1 January 2001.

7. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(f)(1)(B) states that the Secretary concerned shall pay an RCSBP annuity to the surviving spouse of a person who is eligible to provide a reserve component annuity and who dies during the 90-day period beginning on the date he receives his 20-year letter.

8. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12731(a) states that a person is entitled, upon application, to retired pay if the person is at least 60 years of age and has performed at least 20 years of qualifying service.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. It appears that the circumstances of this case have worked an injustice upon the applicant.
2. The FSM's 20-year letter is dated 11 December 2001. Even if it had been sent to the correct address (and it was the FSM's responsibility to keep his address up-to-date at all times), he had at the soonest until 11 March 2002 to make an RCSBP election. He died prior to the expiration of that 90-day period; therefore, the applicant is entitled to receive the annuity as a matter of law. In addition, even if he had wished to elect to defer his election until reaching age 60 (in this case, only one month later), the applicant's concurrence would have been required. In this case, since the FSM would have turned age 60 just over one month after the date of his 20-year letter, option B appears to be the most reasonable, cost-effective option he would have elected.

3. It would be equitable to show the FSM applied for retired pay. He earned his retired pay but his 20-year letter is dated just one month prior to the date he would have turned age 60 and, for whatever reason, it appears he never received it. Correcting his records to show he applied for retired pay would allow the applicant to receive his unpaid retired pay.

4. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse coverage, option B, full base amount on 1 January 2002 and that he applied for retired pay at the same time.

2. That the applicant be paid the RCSBP annuity and the FSM's unpaid retired pay as a result of the above corrections.

BOARD VOTE:

__RJW__ __RWA__ __JTM__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION





                  ___ Raymond J. Wagner _
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002076173
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/10/10
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION FULL GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017403

    Original file (20110017403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The case corrected the military records of an FSM to show the applicant (the FSM's spouse) was entitled to an RCSBP annuity effective the date following the FSM's death. There was no evidence the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 or that the spouse was informed the FSM could participate in the RCSBP. The evidence of record shows the FSM received his Twenty-Year Letter with the accompanying SBP forms in June 2000. a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075563C070403

    Original file (2002075563C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay and that she be paid the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP when he received his 20-year letter in 1990; however, he failed to apply for retired pay in a timely manner and he died one week after he would have been eligible to receive retired pay after a lengthy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062788C070421

    Original file (2001062788C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 March 1987, the FSM was counseled concerning the RCSBP and on that date completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) indicate that the DD Form 1883 was not on file and presumably was not forwarded to DFAS by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command when the FSM applied for retired pay. The DD Form 2656 provides an option not to participate; it does not provide an option to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060258C070421

    Original file (2001060258C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) indicate the FSM was mailed a retirement application packet on 8 June 1999 but they have no record of it being returned either as undeliverable or completed for certification. The evidence of record shows that the FSM never applied for retired pay. Although records at AR-PERSCOM show that he was mailed his retired pay application two years prior to his reaching age 60, there was no requirement that he submit the application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015942

    Original file (20130015942 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he timely applied for Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) spouse only coverage upon receipt of his 20-Year letter. On 26 July 2012, officials at HRC notified the applicant that the FSM did not submit his DD Form 1883 within 90 days of the date he received his 20-Year letter; therefore, it was not a valid election and he had to wait until he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087430C070212

    Original file (2003087430C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-Regular retirement and that she be entitled to receive a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. Therefore, the Board concludes that it would be equitable to correct his records to show he completed a full 20 qualifying years for retired pay. a. redistributing the FSM's excess retirement points...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003824C070205

    Original file (20060003824C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay upon reaching age 60 and that she be paid his retroactive retired pay and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. The applicant provides a Retiree Status and Address Verification, dated October 1988; the FSM’s notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter); a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066238C070421

    Original file (2001066238C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay. The evidence of record shows the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP during an Open Season but then failed to apply for retired pay in a timely manner, preventing the applicant from receiving the SBP annuity when he died. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the FSM applied for retired pay on 1 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073900C070403

    Original file (2002073900C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states through counsel, in effect, that the FSM did complete and forward his DD Form 1883 early in 1987 but it was lost either by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (now the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM)) or the U. S. Postal Service. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. That...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071790C070403

    Original file (2002071790C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay and that she be paid the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. The applicant states that the FSM had enrolled in the RCSBP. He had enrolled in the RCSBP and his spouse, the applicant, who helped him earn his retired pay, would have been entitled to receive the RCSBP annuity if he had applied for retired pay.