Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076048C070215
Original file (2002076048C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 12 December 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002076048

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Roger W. Able Chairperson
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member
Mr. Bernard P. Ingold Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to show Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “MBK” instead of “LBK.”

APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of his separation from active duty, the wrong separation code was entered on his DD Form 214. He contends that the correct separation code should be “MBK.” He states that the only reason for his separation was expiration term of service, that he received an honorable discharge and that his reentry code was RE-1. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 and DA Form 1811 (Physical Data and Aptitude Test Scores Upon Release from Active Duty), dated 27 October 1992.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted on 1 November 1988 for a period of 4 years. He served as an infantryman. On 30 October 1992, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, for expiration term of service.

Item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 shows “LBK.” Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation on 30 October 1992, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “LBK” is “Expiration term of service” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4 or Army Regulation 635-100 (Officer Personnel), chapter 3, section XIV. This separation code is used for an involuntary release from active duty or transfer.

Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at the time, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “MBK” is “Expiration term of service” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-100 (Officer Personnel), chapter 3, section XIV. This separation code is used for a voluntary release of an officer from active duty or transfer.

In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Enlisted Career Systems Division. The opinion points out that the Enlisted Career Systems Division does not have the authority to provide full administrative relief. However, that office concurs with the applicant’s request and recommends that relief be granted. The opinion also states that there is no evidence in the available records to indicate that the use of separation code “LBK” was warranted. Also, that separation code “MBK” should have been entered on the DD Form 214 in question.

On 17 October 2002, the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for review and possible rebuttal. The applicant responded on 23 October 2002 and concurred with the advisory opinion rendered in his case.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 4 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment, and other periods of active duty or active duty for training.

Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that the wrong separation code was entered on his DD Form 214 at the time of his separation on
30 October 1992.

2. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that the correct separation code should be “MBK” instead of “LBK.”

3. The Board also considered the favorable advisory opinion provided by the Chief, Enlisted Career Systems Division.

4. However, the governing regulation, in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation on 30 October 1992, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “LBK” is “Expiration term of service” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4 or Army Regulation 635-100 (Officer Personnel), chapter 3, section XIV.

5. The governing regulation, in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation on 30 October 1992, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “MBK” is “Expiration term of service” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-100 (Officer Personnel), chapter 3, section XIV, which pertains to officers.

6. The applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, for expiration term of service. Therefore, the separation code of “LBK” shown in item 26 (Separation Code) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct as currently constituted.

7. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
8. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

RWA____ KYF____ BPI_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002076048
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20021212
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080186C070215

    Original file (2002080186C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, he submits an Official Statement of Service, dated 25 June 2002; a copy of his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 21 June 1991; a copy of his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 7 November 1986; and excerpts from Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designators) dated 1 December 2000. Item 26 (Separation Code) on the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 7 November 1986 shows “LBK.” Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071236C070402

    Original file (2002071236C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 9a (Authority and Reason) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 9 September 1977 shows his SPD as “LBK.” Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation on 9 September 1977, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “LBK” is “Completion of required service” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-100 (Officer Personnel), paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074129C070403

    Original file (2002074129C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his separation (SPD) code on his 8 May 1993 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “LBK” to “MBK.” That office recommended that the applicant be granted relief, and stated that the separation code, “MBK,” should have been entered on the applicant’s DD Form 214. There was no provision in the 1982 governing regulation for an SPD code of “MBK” for an enlisted soldier when the applicant was separated in May 1993; however,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064300C070421

    Original file (2001064300C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD to be used for these stated reasons. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The applicant was involuntarily released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 and was issued an SPD Code of “LBK” with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084778C070212

    Original file (2003084778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her SPD code is applicable to someone that is barred from reenlisting. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 at Headquarters, Department of the Army advised that the regulation prior to August 1993 did not provide an SPD code for the voluntary discharge or voluntary/involuntary REFRAD of Soldiers under the provisions of chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of ETS; an SPD code was only provided to cover the situation of involuntary discharge of enlisted Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063624C070421

    Original file (2001063624C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 and was issued an RE Code of “RE 3” with a corresponding SPD code of “LBK.” The Board notes that under Army Regulation 635-5-1, the SPD code for voluntary REFRAD or transfer to the USAR is “MBK” with a corresponding RE code of “RE 1 or 3.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002059

    Original file (20110002059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was honorably released from active duty on 7 October 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service. Item 26 (Separation Code) of the DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows he was assigned code “LBK” for an involuntary release from active duty or transfer by reason of completion of required active service. However, the SPD/RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087216C070212

    Original file (2003087216C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 26 (Separation Code) and item 27 (Reentry Code) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 22 August 1991 be changed. Army Regulation 635-5 directs, in pertinent part, that item 27 will contain the entry, "NA" for Army National Guard or U.S. Army Reserve members released after serving on active duty training. Therefore, item 26 on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067961C070402

    Original file (2002067961C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served on active duty for 3 years, from 15 July 1980 through 14 July 1983. The records available to the Board are incomplete and were provided by the applicant. The evidence does show that the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation assigned him a SPD code of LBK, which indicates an involuntary separation and by regulation mandated a reentry code of RE-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016912

    Original file (20140016912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 25 September 1996. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code LBK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers involuntarily released from active duty upon completion of required active service and that this code is to be used for Regular Army Soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment that are separated on completion of enlistment under the provisions of Army...