Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075923C070403
Original file (2002075923C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE:      12 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002075923

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Judy Blanchard-Miller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member
Mr. William D. Powers Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that about 1 year after he enlisted in the Army, he started receiving letters and phone calls from his brothers, his sisters and from the family minister regarding his father and mother’s conditions at home. One of his brothers told him that his father had become an abusive alcoholic and that their lives had become a living hell. He states, that his mother was forced to work and support the family and that he became very concerned about his family problems. So, he went to his commander with letters and asked for compassionate leave, his request for leave was denied. He was besieged with calls for help for 3 months after his denial. The pressure became so great that he decided to go absent without leave (AWOL). However, he planned to return to the Army when things cleared up. When he arrived home, he found that his mother’s job did not pay enough to support the family and his father was taking any money that he could to support his drinking. The applicant believed, that the only solution to the problem was to stay home and get a job to support his family. After being AWOL for about 4 months, he realized that things were getting better and decided to turn himself in. But before he could turn himself in, two military police showed up and took him to Fort Bragg, North Carolina. He received a court-martial and a UD. The applicant submits a letter in support of his application.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein was obtained from reconstructed personnel records.

On 16 August 1962, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of
3 years. His military occupational specialty was 640.00 (Light Vehicle Driver). The highest grade he achieved was pay grade E-2.

On 11 March 1963, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP), under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for being AWOL from 8 to
11 March 1963. His imposed punishment was 14 days restriction and an oral reprimand.

On 28 June 1963, the applicant accepted an NJP under Article 15, UCMJ, for being disrespectful in language toward a superior noncommissioned officer. His imposed punishment was a forfeiture of $15.00 pay, 14 days restriction and extra duty.

On 29 June 1964, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of two specifications of being AWOL from 12 September to 8 October 1963 and from
9 November 1963 to 7 April 1964. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months, a forfeiture of $30.00 pay per month for 6 months and a reduction to pay grade E-1.

On 6 July 1964, a medical examination found the applicant fit for retention.

The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's discharge are not on file. The Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged on 26 August 1964, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness, and was issued a UD.

Army Regulation 635-208, in effect, provided, in pertinent part, the policies, procedures, and guidance for the elimination of enlisted personnel who were determined to be unfit for further military service. However, at the time of the discharge a UD was normally considered appropriate.

There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.

3. The contentions of the applicant have been noted. While the Board is empathetic, the applicant's personal problems are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JNS__ __DPH___ __WDP__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002075923
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/12
TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1964/08/26
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR235-208
DISCHARGE REASON A50.00
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.144.500
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000526C070208

    Original file (20040000526C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He related that he did not see his father again until he was 11 years old. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061040C070421

    Original file (2001061040C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 6 February 1964, the applicant’s commander submitted a recommendation to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021019

    Original file (20100021019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to an honorable discharge. Accordingly, he was discharged on 29 April 1965 in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 with a UD. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077093C070215

    Original file (2002077093C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The interviewing officer went on to state that the applicant had the intelligence to be rehabilitated; however, he believed that in view of his desire to get out of the Army, the applicant was not properly motivated for completing his service obligation. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004919C070206

    Original file (20050004919C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the Army and entered active duty on 16 August 1967. On 17 July 1974, the applicant submitted a statement in support of his request for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081395C070215

    Original file (2002081395C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 18 May 1966, the applicant's commander initiated a recommendation to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil/military authorities.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089591C070403

    Original file (2003089591C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was an alcoholic at the time of his military service and has been sober for 20 years. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008932

    Original file (20070008932.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) the applicant was issued at the time of his discharge confirms he was discharged on 23 February 1965 for unfitness, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations) and his characterization of service was under other than honorable conditions with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008805C070206

    Original file (20050008805C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 April 1965, the applicant’s commander submitted a request to separate the applicant for unfitness. The applicant stated that if he were returned to duty he would go AWOL again. In the interviews the applicant had with his commander and the chaplain, the applicant stated that he wanted to go home to his mother.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707196

    Original file (199707196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record of trial shows that the applicant stated that he was in the National Guard for a year and a half prior to joining the Army, that he had a 16 year old and a 5 month old sister, that his father was unable to work, and his mother did not work. The applicant was found guilty of the charge and sentenced him to be discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit $50.00 a month for six months, and to be confined at hard labor for six months. DISCUSSION : Considering...